The Interactive Fly

Genes involved in tissue and organ development

Ectodermal gut- Foregut and hindgut

  • gut development description
  • Cross regulation of intercellular gap junction communication and paracrine signaling pathways during organogenesis in Drosophila
  • The adult Drosophila gastric and stomach organs are maintained by a multipotent stem cell pool at the foregut/midgut junction in the cardia (proventriculus)
  • The putative Na(+)/Cl(-)-dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter Inebriated in the Drosophila hindgut is essential for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis
  • Molecular and cellular organization of taste neurons in adult Drosophila pharynx
  • A luminal glycoprotein drives dose-dependent diameter expansion of the Drosophila melanogaster hindgut tube
  • Chiral cell sliding drives left-right asymmetric organ twisting
  • E and ID proteins regulate cell chirality and left-right asymmetric development in Drosophila
  • Maintenance of hindgut reabsorption during cold exposure is a key adaptation for Drosophila cold tolerance

    Genes influencing foregut and hindgut

    Foregut (pharynx, esophagus and proventriculus)

    Hindgut (proctodeum)

    Gut Development

    The ectodermal derivatives of the gut are the stomodeum and the proctodeum. The proctodeum is formed concurrently with germ-band elongation [Images] while formation of the foregut continues later and is associated with head involution. Adult foregut consists of the esophagus, pharynx, crop and the sucking pump or cibarium found at the base of the proboscis. Salivary gland cells, also of ectodermal origin, become part of the forgut and are derived independently from cells immediately behind the cephalic furrow.

    The anterior endodermal anlage invaginates during gastrulation (stage 7) [Images] to produce the anterior midgut primordium, while the posterior midgut primordia sink into the embryo during stage 8 and enter the first postblastodermal division during stage 9. The anlagen for the hindgut form a ring encircling the posterior midgut primordia at the posterior pole. The whole of the hindgut is ectodermal in origin, including Malpighian tubules that form close to the junction between hindgut and posterior midgut.

    The entire gut is remodeled during metamorphosis from imaginal cells at the base of the salivary glands (foregut), at the junction of the foregut and midgut, and in the hindgut and around the anus. Malpighian tubules are an exception to this remodeling process. Instead, they persist throughout metamorphosis unmodified.

    Genes affecting ectodermal portions of the gut

    Foregut is determined by the same genes that act in the gnathal (mouth) segments of head. Foregut is really an extention of mandible, maxillary and labial segments and is regulated by genes that are expressed in these segments including spalt, the head gap genes, and the ANTP-complex genes Deformed and Sex combs reduced.

    Why is it that labial, the most anteriorly expressed ANTP-C gene, is not involved in foregut determination? The portion of the blastoderm that invaginates to form ectodermal gut derivatives is really ventral-anterior, resulting in the incorporation of cells of the gnathal segments into the forgut. The more dorsal anterior portions, including the pregnathal intercalary segment (expressing labial) form dorsal anterior structures such as the eyes and brain. tailless and forkhead are required for hindgut, including Malpighian tubules and anal plate, while huckebein is required for foregut only.

    Cross regulation of intercellular gap junction communication and paracrine signaling pathways during organogenesis in Drosophila

    The spatial and temporal coordination of patterning and morphogenesis is often achieved by paracrine morphogen signals or by the direct coupling of cells via gap junctions. How paracrine signals and gap junction communication cooperate to control the coordinated behavior of cells and tissues is mostly unknown. This study found that Hedgehog signaling is required for the expression of wingless and of Delta/Notch target genes in a single row of boundary cells in the foregut-associated proventriculus organ of the Drosophila embryo. These cells coordinate the movement and folding of proventricular cells to generate a multilayered organ. hedgehog and wingless regulate gap junction communication by transcriptionally activating the innexin2 gene, which encodes a member of the innexin family of gap junction proteins. In innexin2 mutants, gap junction-mediated cell-to-cell communication is strongly reduced and the proventricular cell layers fail to fold and invaginate, similarly as in hedgehog or wingless mutants. It was further found that innexin2 is required in a feedback loop for the transcriptional activation of the hedgehog and wingless morphogens and of Delta in the proventriculus primordium. It is proposed that the transcriptional cross regulation of paracrine and gap junction-mediated signaling is essential for organogenesis in Drosophila (Lechner, 2007).

    In both vertebrates and invertebrates, the posterior foregut constitutes a center of organogenesis from which gut-associated organs such as the lung in vertebrates or the proventriculus in Drosophila develop. Proventriculus development involves the folding and invagination of epithelial cell layers to generate a multiply-folded organ. Two cell populations, the anterior and the posterior boundary cells, were shown previously to control cell movement and the folding of the proventriculus organ. In the posterior boundary cells, which organize the endoderm rim of the proventriculus, the JAK/STAT signaling cascade cooperates with Notch signaling to control the expression of the gene short stop encoding a cytoskeletal crosslinker protein of the spectraplakin superfamily. Thereby the Notch signaling pathway is connected to cytoskeletal organization in the posterior boundary cells, which have to provide a stiffness function to enable the invagination of the ectodermal foregut cells. The findings in this paper provide evidence that hedgehog is essential for the Notch signaling-dependent allocation of the anterior boundary cells. In amorphic hedgehog mutants, evagination and the formation of the constriction at the ectoderm/endoderm boundary are not affected, however, the inward movement of the anterior boundary cells is not initiated at the keyhole stage. The lack of cell movement of the ectodermal proventricular cells is consistent with the finding that hedgehog specifically controls Notch target gene activity in the anterior boundary cells. Genetic experiments further identify wingless as a target gene of hedgehog in the anterior boundary cells. wingless, in turn, controls the transcription of the innexin2 gene, which is expressed in the invaginating proventricular cells. When wingless is re-supplied in the genetic background of hedgehog mutants, innexin2 expression is rescued, providing further evidence that innexin2 is a target gene of wingless in the proventriculus primordium. Innexin2 encodes a member of the innexin family of gap junction proteins and is essential for the development of epithelial tissues. In the proventriculus, innexin2 mRNA is initially expressed in the early evagination stage in a broad domain covering both the ectodermal and endodermal precursor cells of the proventriculus primordium. When the ectodermal cells start to invaginate into the proventricular endoderm, innexin2 expression is upregulated in the ectodermal cell layer. Invagination of the ectodermal cells fails in hedgehog, wingless and kropf mutant proventriculi and dye tracer injection experiments demonstrate that hedgehog and kropf mutants show a strong reduction of gap junction communication. These data suggest that the direct coupling of cells via Innexin2-containing gap junctions, which are induced in response to hedgehog and wingless activities, is important for the coordinated movement of the ectodermal cell layer. It is known from extensive studies in mammals that the coupling of cells and tissues via gap junctions enables the diffusion of second messengers, such as Ca2+, inositol-trisphosphate (IP3) or cyclic nucleotides to allow the rapid coordination of cellular behavior during morphogenetic processes such as cell migration and growth control. Cell movement and folding involves a modulation of cell adhesion and of cytoskeletal architecture of the proventricular cells. A functional interaction of innexin2 with the cell adhesion regulator DE-cadherin, which is a core component of adherens junctions has been shown recently by co-immunoprecipitation, yeast two-hybrid studies, and genetic analysis. In mutants of DE-cadherin, Innexin2 is mislocalized and vice versa suggesting that the regulation of cell adhesion and gap junction-mediated communication may be linked. Similar evidence for a coordinated regulation of connexin activity and N-cadherin has been obtained in mammals during migration of neural crest cells (Lechner, 2007).

    In kropf mutants or innexin2 knockdown animals, hedgehog, wingless and Delta transcription is strongly reduced as shown by in situ hybridization and by quantitative RT PCR experiments using mRNAs isolated from staged embryos. Furthermore, hedgehog, wingless and Delta are ectopically expressed and their mRNA is upregulated in embryos in which innexin2 is overexpressed. In summary, these experiments provide strong support that the gap junction protein Innexin2 plays an essential role enabling or promoting transcriptional activation of hedgehog, wingless and Delta. These data point towards an essential requirement of gap junction communication for the transcriptional activation of morphogen-encoding genes activating evolutionary conserved signaling cascades essential for patterning in animals. It is of note that gap junctions are established at very early stages of embryonic development, correlating with a maternal and zygotic expression of innexin2 and other innexin family members. kropf mutant animals, which are devoid of maternal and zygotic innexin2 expression are early embryonic lethal and develop no epithelia, consistent with a fundamental role of gap junctions in development, on top of which pattern formation of tissues and organs may occur. It has been shown previously that gap junctions are essential for C. elegans, Drosophila, and vertebrate embryogenesis from early stages onwards (Lechner, 2007 and references therein).

    In the nematode C. elegans, a transient network formed by the innexin gap junction protein NSY-5 was recently shown to coordinate left-right asymmetry in the developing nervous system. Previous findings in chick and Xenopus laevis embryos have suggested an essential role of connexin43-mediated gap junction for the determination of the left-right asymmetry of the embryos. Treatment of cultured chick embryos with lindane, which results in a decreased gap junctional communication, frequently unbiased normal left-right asymmetry of Sonic hedgehog and Nodal gene expression, causing the normally left-sided program to be recapitulated. An important role of connexin43 (Cx43)-dependent gap junction communication for sonic hedgehog expression was also observed in limb patterning of the chick wing. Additionally, modulation of gap junctions in Xenopus embryos by pharmacological agents specifically induced heterotaxia involving mirror-image reversals of the heart, gut, and gall bladder. These data in combination with the current findings indicate that the transcriptional regulation of hedgehog and other morphogen-encoding genes by gap junction proteins may be evolutionary conserved between deuterostomes (vertebrates) and protostomes (Drosophila), although the Drosophila innexin gap junction genes share very little sequence homology with the connexin genes. The molecular mechanism underlying innexin2-mediated transcriptional regulation of hedgehog, wingless and Delta is not clear. It has been proposed that the nuclear localization of the carboxy-tail of connexin43 may exert effects on gene expression and growth in cardiomyocytes and HeLa cells. This would infer a cleavage of connexin43 to release the C-terminus, however, in vivo evidence for this event is still lacking. Sequence analysis reveals a nuclear receptor recognition motif within the C-terminus of Innexin2. It has been demonstrated that this recognition motif mediates the interaction of coactivators with nuclear receptors. However, there is no immunohistochemical evidence for a nuclear localization of Innexin2 or the Innexin2 C-terminus in Drosophila embryonic cells indicating that a direct involvement of Innexin2 in regulating transcription of target genes may not occur. The direct association of a transcription factor with gap junctions has been recently proposed for the mouse homolog of ZO-1-associated nucleic acid-binding protein (ZONAB). This transcription factor binds to ZO-1, which is associated with oligodendrocyte, astrocyte and retina gap junctions. It is possible that innexin2-dependent transcriptional regulation may involve a similar type of mechanism: a still unknown transcriptional regulator associated with the C-terminus of innexin2-containing gap junctions could be released upon modulation of gap junction composition thereby modulating the transcription of innexin2-dependent target genes (Lechner, 2007).

    The adult Drosophila gastric and stomach organs are maintained by a multipotent stem cell pool at the foregut/midgut junction in the cardia (proventriculus)

    Stomach cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Thus, it is important to elucidate the properties of gastric stem cells, including their regulation and transformation. To date, such stem cells have not been identified in Drosophila. Using clonal analysis and molecular marker labeling, this study has identified a multipotent stem-cell pool at the foregut/midgut junction in the cardia (proventriculus). Daughter cells migrate upward either to anterior midgut or downward to esophagus and crop. The cardia functions as a gastric valve and the anterior midgut and crop together function as a stomach in Drosophila; therefore, the foregut/midgut stem cells have been named gastric stem cells (GaSC). JAK-STAT signaling regulates GaSC proliferation, Wingless signaling regulates GaSC self-renewal, and hedgehog signaling regulates GaSC differentiation. The differentiation pattern and genetic control of the Drosophila GaSCs suggest the possible similarity to mouse gastric stem cells. The identification of the multipotent stem cell pool in the gastric gland in Drosophila will facilitate studies of gastric stem cell regulation and transformation in mammals (Singh, 2011).

    This study has identified multipotent gastric stem cells at the junction of the adult Drosophila foregut and midgut. The GaSCs express the Stat92E-GFP reporter, wg-Gal4 UAS-GFP, and Ptc, and are slowly proliferating. The GaSCs first give rise to the fast proliferative progenitors in both foregut and anterior midgut. The foregut progenitors migrate downward and differentiate into crop cells. The anterior midgut progenitors migrate upward and differentiate into midgut cells. However, at this stage because of limited markers availability and complex tissues systems at cardia location, it is uncertain how many types of cells are produced and how many progenitor cells are in the cardia. Clonal and molecular markers analysis suggest that cardia cells are populated from gastric stem cells at the foregut/midgut (F/M) junction; however, it cannot be ruled out that there may be other progenitor cells with locally or limited differential potential that may also take part in cell replacement of cardia cells. Nevertheless, the observed differentiation pattern of GaSCs in Drosophila may be similar to that of the mouse gastric stem cells. Gastric stem cells in the mouse are located at the neck-isthmus region of the tubular unit. They produce several terminally differentiated cells with bidirectional migration, in which upward migration towards lumen become pit cells and downward migration results in fundic gland cells (Singh, 2011).

    Three signal transduction pathways differentially regulate the GaSC self-renewal or differentiation. The loss of JAK-STAT signaling resulted in quiescent GaSCs; that is, the stem cells remained but did not incorporate BrdU or rarely incorporated BrdU. In contrast, the amplification of JAK-STAT signaling resulted in GaSC expansion (Singh, 2011).

    These observations indicate that JAK-STAT signaling regulates GaSC proliferation. In contrast, the loss of Wg signaling resulted in GaSC loss, while the amplification of Wg resulted in GaSC expansion, indicating that Wg signaling regulates GaSC self-renewal and maintenance. Finally, the loss of Hh signaling resulted in GaSC expansion at the expense of differentiated cells, indicating that Hh signaling regulates GaSC differentiation. The JAK-STAT signaling has not been directly connected to gastric stem cell regulation in mammal. However, the quiescent gastric stem cells/progenitors are activated by interferon γ (an activator of the JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway), indicating that JAK-STAT pathways may also regulate gastric stem cell activity in mammals. Amplification of JAK-STAT signaling resulted in expansion of stem cells in germline, posterior midgut and malpighian tubules of adult Drosophila. In the mammalian system, it has been reported that activated STAT contributes to gastric hyperplasia and that STAT signaling regulates gastric cancer development and progression. Wnt signaling has an important function in the maintenance of intestinal stem cells and progenitor cells in mice and hindgut stem cells in Drosophila, and its activation results in gastrointestinal tumor development. Tcf plays a critical role in the maintenance of the epithelial stem cell. Mice lacking Tcf resulted in depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine as well as being unable to maintain long-term homeostasis of skin epithelia. A recent study even demonstrates that the Wnt target gene Lgr5 is a stem cell marker in the pyloric region and at the esophagus border of the mouse stomach. Further, it has been found that overactivation of the Wnt signaling can transform the adult Lgr5+ve stem cells in the distal stomach, indicating that Wnt signaling may also regulate gastric stem cell self-renewal and maintenance in the mammal. Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) and its target genes are expressed in the human and rodent stomach. Blocking Shh signaling with cyclopamine in mice results in an increase in the cell proliferation of gastric gland, suggesting that Shh may also regulate the gastric stem cell differentiation in mice. These data together suggest that the genetic control of the Drosophila GaSC may be similar to that of the mammalian gastric stem cells (Singh, 2011).

    The potential GaSCs niche. In most stem cell systems that have been well characterized to date, the stem cells reside in a specialized microenvironment, called a niche.66 A niche is a subset of neighboring stromal cells and has a fixed anatomical location. The niche stromal cells often secrete growth factors to regulate stem cell behavior, and the stem cell niche plays an essential role in maintaining the stem cells, which lose their stem-cell status once they are detached from the niche (Singh, 2011).

    Loss of the JAK-STAT signaling results in the GaSCs being quiescent; the stem cells remain but do not proliferate or rarely proliferate. The Dome receptor is expressed in GaSCs, while the ligand Upd is expressed in adjacent cells. Upd-positive hub cells function as a germline stem cell niche in the Drosophila testis. Further, thia study demonstrated that overexpression of upd results in GaSC expansion, suggesting that the Upd-positive cells may function as a GaSC niche. Furthermore, while Stat92E-GFP expression is regulated by the JAK-STAT signaling in other systems, its expression at the F/M junction seems independent of the JAK-STAT signaling because Stat92E-GFP expression is not significantly disrupted in the Stat92Ets mutant flies, suggesting that the GaSCs may have unique properties (Singh, 2011).

    The stomach epithelium undergoes continuous renewal by gastric stem cells throughout adulthood. Disruption of the renewal process may be a major cause of gastric cancer, the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, yet the gastric stem cells and their regulations have not been fully characterized. A more detailed characterization of markers and understanding of the molecular mechanisms control gastric stem cell behavior will have a major impact on future strategies for gastric cancer prevention and therapy. The information gained from this report may facilitate studies of gastric stem cell regulation and transformation in mammals (Singh, 2011).

    The putative Na(+)/Cl(-)-dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter Inebriated in the Drosophila hindgut is essential for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis

    Most organisms are able to maintain systemic water homeostasis over a wide range of external or dietary osmolarities. The excretory system, composed of the kidneys in mammals and the Malpighian tubules and hindgut in insects, can increase water conservation and absorption to maintain systemic water homeostasis, which enables organisms to tolerate external hypertonicity or desiccation. However, the mechanisms underlying the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis by the excretory system have not been fully characterized. The present study found that the putative Na(+)/Cl(-)-dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter inebriated (ine) is expressed in the basolateral membrane of anterior hindgut epithelial cells. This was confirmed by comparison with a known basolateral localized protein, the alpha subunit of Na(+)-K(+) ATPase (ATPalpha). Under external hypertonicity, loss of ine in the hindgut epithelium results in severe dehydration without damage to the hindgut epithelial cells, implicating a physiological failure of water conservation/absorption. It was also found that hindgut expression of ine is required for water conservation under desiccating conditions. Importantly, specific expression of ine in the hindgut epithelium can completely restore disrupted systemic water homeostasis in ine mutants under both conditions. Therefore, ine in the Drosophila hindgut is essential for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis (Luan 2015).

    Water homeostasis is essential for the survival of all organisms. The mammalian kidney and the Malpighian tubule and hindgut of insects play indispensable roles in maintaining water homeostasis over a wide range of external or dietary osmolarities. These organs can increase water conservation and absorption to maintain systemic water homeostasis, which enables organisms to tolerate external hypertonicity or desiccation (Luan 2015).

    The mammalian kidney regulates water balance mainly through the antidiuretic hormone (ADH), which enhances water absorption. Failure of antidiuretic mechanisms can result in disrupted systemic water homeostasis, causing pathological conditions like Diabetes Insipidus. Although antidiuretic factors for the enhancement of water absorption, such as Schgr-ITP and CAPA-related peptides, are also present in insects, the mechanisms of water conservation and absorption in the excretory system are not fully characterized, especially in Drosophila (Luan 2015).

    Previous studies have shown that loss of the putative Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter ine causes hypersensitivity to dietary hypertonicity in Drosophila; however, the mechanism underlying this effect remains unknown. Ine is a member of the Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter family, which is conserved across invertebrates and vertebrates. Members of this family share several common structural features, including 12 transmembrane domains flanked by intracellular N and C termini, and an extracellular loop between the third and fourth transmembrane domains. These proteins play critical roles in neurotransmission, as well as cellular and systemic homeostasis, by transporting neurotransmitters, osmolytes, and energy metabolites across the plasma membrane. There is sequence similarity between ine and the betaine/GABA transporter (BGT1), a mammalian member of the Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter family. Both BGT1 and ine are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS), as well as organs that perform water absorption, and both are involved in the control of neuronal excitability and tolerance to hypertonicity. This suggests that these two proteins may function through a similar mechanism (Luan 2015).

    Betaine, an active organic compound, is the substrate of BGT1 in renal medullary cells; however, the substrate of ine has yet to be identified. Betaine, like other intracellular organic osmolytes, can protect cells from external hypertonicity by balancing high extracellular osmolarity and preserving cell volume without interfering with cell function. However, no direct genetic evidence supports the osmoprotective function of the BGT1-mediated accumulation of betaine in renal medullary cells. Specifically, BGT1 knockout mice are healthy, and renal medullary cells appear to be normal in the hypertonic environment of the renal medulla. Therefore, the physiological function of the Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter in the excretory system remains to be elucidated (Luan 2015).

    By investigating the function of ine in Drosophila, an excellent genetic model in which gene expression can be evaluated and manipulated in vivo, the physiological function will be better understood of Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporters, including BGT1, in the excretory system. This study elucidates the role of ine in the Drosophila hindgut, and reveal a novel mechanism mediated by ine for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis (Luan 2015).

    This study has demonstrated that the mediation of water conservation/absorption by ine in the hindgut is essential for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis in Drosophila. In insects, systemic water homeostasis is tightly regulated by the excretory system, including the Malpighian tubules and the hindgut, to ensure a constant internal environment. The dynamic balance between Malpighian tubule secretion and hindgut reabsorption, both of which are controlled by diuretic and antidiuretic hormones or factors, maintains water homeostasis in response to fluctuations in external osmotic conditions. However, in adult Drosophila, the water conservation/absorption mechanisms of the hindgut have not been elucidated. The current results demonstrate that ine is expressed in the basolateral membrane of the hindgut epithelium, suggesting that ine transports substrate from the hemolymph into hindgut epithelial cells. Surprisingly, under conditions of external hypertonicity, the systemic water homeostasis of ine mutant flies is disrupted, whereas that of WT flies is not disturbed. These results demonstrate that hindgut expression of ine mediates water conservation/absorption under external hypertonicity and maintains systemic water homeostasis. These results also suggest possible mechanism for ine function: transport of an osmolyte by ine into the hindgut epithelium increases intracellular molarity, which enhances water conservation/absorption from the hindgut lumen. Such a function would be particularly important in the condition of external hypertonicity, when increased molality in the hindgut lumen prevents osmotic flow of water into hindgut epithelium (Luan 2015).

    It could be argued that ine functions through an osmoprotective mechanism, in which increased intracellular accumulation of osmolytes mediated by ine protects the hindgut epithelium from cellular death due to extracellular hypertonicity. However, this study demonstrates that anterior hindgut epithelial cells are not damaged by external hypertonicity in the absence of ine, suggesting that ine function in water conservation/absorption is not secondary to an osmoprotective effect. The existence of other osmolytes or transporters is proposed that function as osmoprotectors, and protect anterior hindgut epithelial cells against lethality under external hypertonicity. The expression of several genes, including some organic transporters, is up-regulated in the hindgut in response to external hypertonicity, supporting this possibility (Luan 2015).

    Ine protein is expressed solely in the anterior hindgut. The anterior hindgut is an important site of water absorption, as demonstrated in insects other than Drosophila. In locusts, isosmotic fluid absorption in the anterior hindgut is driven by an apical membrane electrogenic Cl- pump. The antidiuretic hormone Schgr-ITP acts on the locust hindgut via cyclic AMP and GMP to increase the conductance of both K+ and Na+ and to stimulate the Cl- pump. As a result of the increased ion uptake, water absorption increases. It remains unknown, however, whether similar ion-uptake-coupled water absorption mechanisms are present in the Drosophila hindgut. This study found that loss of ine in the anterior hindgut epithelium causes severe dehydration in response to a hypertonic diet, and higher rates of body water loss under desiccation, which suggests the existence of a new mechanism of water conservation/absorption in the hindgut of Drosophila mediated by ine. It was proposed that ine transports osmolytes across the plasma membrane from the hemolymph and accumulates osmolytes within the hindgut epithelium, generating an osmotic driving force to conserve/absorb water from hindgut lumen against external hypertonicity. However, this theory lacks an explanation for how water is transferred into the hemolymph from epithelial cells, and to date, the transporter activity of ine has not been confirmed. The possibility thatine may improve water conservation/absorption through a different, unknown mechanism cannot be ruled out (Luan, 2015)

    In addition to the anterior hindgut, the Malpighian tubules, rectum, and midgut also contribute to water absorption and conservation in insects under conditions of external hypertonicity or desiccation. During dehydration stress, the modulation of tyramine signaling in Drosophila Malpighian tubules enhances conservation of body water. Several anti-diuretic factors acting on the Malpighian tubules have been found. For example, CAPA-1 acts on Ncc69, the Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter, to increase water absorption through an ion uptake coupled mechanism. In addition, PKG, a cGMP-dependent kinase antagonizes the diuretic effects of tyramine and leukokinin. The rectum can also transport water from lumen to the hemolymph. In the locust, the chloride transport stimulating hormone (CTSH) acts to increase ion-dependent active transport of fluid from the rectum lumen. Finally, the antidiuretic hormone RhoprCAPA-2 inhibits fluid transport into the midgut lumen in Rhodnius prolixus to conserve water. Therefore, ine-mediated water conservation/absorption may not be the only mechanism by which systemic water homeostasis is maintained under external hypertonicity in Drosophila (Luan 2015).

    Water is essential for the proper function of virtually all living cells. Organisms have developed mechanisms in the excretory system to maintain water hemostasis for a constant internal milieu under different external osmotic conditions, such as hypertonicity. This study reveals that hindgut expression of ine, a putative Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter, is indispensable for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis in Drosophila. However, further investigation of the novel mechanism mediated by ine in the hindgut is necessary to fully understand the water conservation and absorption mechanisms of Drosophila hindgut, as well as the physiological functions of the members of the Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter family (Luan 2015)

    Molecular and cellular organization of taste neurons in adult Drosophila pharynx

    The Drosophila pharyngeal taste organs are poorly characterized despite their location at important sites for monitoring food quality. Functional analysis of pharyngeal neurons has been hindered by the paucity of molecular tools to manipulate them, as well as their relative inaccessibility for neurophysiological investigations. This study generated receptor-to-neuron maps of all three pharyngeal taste organs by performing a comprehensive chemoreceptor-GAL4/LexA expression analysis. The organization of pharyngeal neurons reveals similarities and distinctions in receptor repertoires and neuronal groupings compared to external taste neurons. The mapping results were validated by pinpointing a single pharyngeal neuron required for feeding avoidance of L-canavanine. Inducible activation of pharyngeal taste neurons reveals functional differences between external and internal taste neurons and functional subdivision within pharyngeal sweet neurons. These results provide roadmaps of pharyngeal taste organs in an insect model system for probing the role of these understudied neurons in controlling feeding behaviors (Chen, 2017).

    In Drosophila, taste neurons located in sensilla in several body regions sense and distinguish nutritive substances such as sugars, amino acids, and low salt, and potentially harmful ones such as high salt, acids, and a diverse variety of bitter compounds. Hair-like sensilla on the labellum, distal segments of the legs (tarsi), anterior wing margins, and ovipositor have access to chemicals in external substrates. Pit-like sensilla (taste pegs) on the oral surface have access only once the fly extends its proboscis and opens the labellar palps; similar sensilla in the pharynx have access only when food intake is initiated. Based on its anatomical position, the pharynx is considered to act as a gatekeeper to control ingestion, promoting the intake of appetitive foods and blocking that of toxins (Chen, 2017).

    Three distinct internal taste organs are present in the adult fly pharynx: the labral sense organ (LSO), the ventral cibarial sense organ (VCSO), and dorsal cibarial sense organ (DCSO). The VCSO and DCSO are paired on opposite sides of the rostrum, whereas the LSO is located in the haustellum. The organization and neuronal composition of all three organs, based on both light and electron microscopy data, have been described in detail. Nine separate sensilla are present in the LSO, of which 1-6 are innervated by a single mechanosensory neuron each. The remaining three, named 7-9, are uniporous sensilla, a feature that ascribes chemosensory function to them. Sensillum 7 is the largest one, with eight chemosensory neurons. Sensilla 8 and 9 have two neurons each (one mechanosensory and one chemosensory). Although one study reported two sensilla in the VCSO, this and other studies have observed three sensilla in the VCSO, innervated by a total of eight chemosensory neurons. The DCSO has two sensilla, each containing three chemosensory neurons. Notwithstanding the availability of detailed anatomical descriptions of pharyngeal taste organs, little is known about their function. The internal location of these organs poses challenges for electrophysiological analysis of taste neurons located within them. Additionally, few molecular tools are currently described to manipulate the function of selected pharyngeal taste neurons (Chen, 2017).

    The expression and function of members of several chemosensory receptor gene families such as gustatory receptors (Grs), ionotropic receptors (Irs), Pickpocket (Ppk) channels, and transient receptor potential channels (Trps) have been found in external gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) of the labellum and the tarsal segments. A number of Gr- and Ir-GAL4 drivers are also shown to label pharyngeal organs, but only a few, including Gr43a and members of sweet Gr clade, Gr2a, Ir60b, and TrpA1, have been mapped to specific taste neurons (Chen, 2017).

    This study generated receptor-to-neuron maps for three pharyngeal taste organs by a systematic expression analysis of chemoreceptor reporter lines that represent Gr, Ir, and Ppk receptor families. The maps reveal a large and diverse chemoreceptor repertoire in the pharynx. Some receptors are expressed in combinations that are predictive of neuronal sweet or bitter taste function based on analysis of external GRNs. By contrast, some pharyngeal taste neurons express receptor combinations that are distinct from any that have been reported in other organs, leaving open questions about their functional roles. This study validated he receptor-to-neuron maps derived from reporter gene expression by assessing roles of pharyngeal GRNs predicted to detect L-canavanine, a bitter tastant for which a complete receptor repertoire has been reported. Interestingly, a systematic activation analysis of different classes of pharyngeal taste neurons reveals functional differences between external and internal taste neurons for bitter avoidance and functional subdivision within pharyngeal sweet neurons for sweet acceptance. Together, this study provides a molecular map of pharyngeal taste organs, which will serve as a resource for future studies of the roles of pharyngeal taste neurons in food evaluation (Chen, 2017).

    Internal pharyngeal taste organs are the least explored taste organs, despite their obvious importance in insect feeding behaviors, which are crucial drivers for damaging crops and vectoring disease. The receptor-to-neuron maps of pharyngeal taste organs suggest a high degree of molecular complexity, with co-expression of different chemoreceptor family members in many pharyngeal GRNs. In particular, none of the pharyngeal GRNs were found to express Gr genes alone; rather, one or more Ir genes were always expressed in the same neurons. Gr and Ir genes are also co-expressed in some external sweet and bitter-sensing GRNs. Thus, both classes of receptors are likely to contribute to responses of Gr/Ir-expressing neurons in the LSO and VCSO, but whether they interact functionally or act independently remains to be determined. In the LSO, expression of sweet Grs and Ir76b overlaps in pharyngeal sweet GRNs, as observed in tarsi as well. In the pharynx, this study also found co-expression of ppk28 with Ir genes, which has not been described for external GRNs. These observations invite explorations of possible crosstalk, and its functional significance, between the two classes of receptors (Chen, 2017).

    Pharyngeal GRNs also exhibit distinctive functional groupings. All external bitter GRNs have always been found grouped with sweet GRNs in taste hairs. By contrast, canonical sweet and bitter GRNs appear to segregate in different sensilla in the LSO, which is most well characterized for this perspective. L8 and L9 may be functionally identical and house only one Gr66a-expressing bitter GRN each, whereas L7 contains two sweet GRNs (L7-1 and L7-2). Moreover, external hairs typically have two to four GRNs, each of which has a distinct functional profile. In the LSO duplications are found (L7-1 and L7-2 are identical, as are L7-4 and L7-5), although differences between these pairs of GRNs may emerge as additional chemoreceptors are mapped in the pharynx. Finally, it is difficult to ascribe putative functions to most pharyngeal GRNs based on existing knowledge of receptor function in external counterparts. The L7-3 Gr-expressing neuron, for example, does not express members of the sweet clade, but neither does it express any of the common bitter Grs (Gr32a, Gr66a, and Gr89a) that would corroborate its role as a bitter GRN. Similarly, with the exception of salt neurons that may express Ir76b alone, there are few known functions for GRNs that solely express Ir genes. One possibility is that some of these GRNs possess novel chemoreceptor family ligand interactions. For example, L7-7 is involved in sensing sucrose but limiting sugar ingestion, representing an Ir neuron that operates in a negative circuit module for sugar intake. In addition, another recent study suggests that TRPA1 expression in L8 and L9 of the LSO is involved in feeding avoidance to bacterial endotoxins lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Alternatively, some pharyngeal GRNs may evaluate characteristics other than palatability, such as temperature or viscosity. Ir25a, which is broadly expressed in all 24 pharyngeal GRNs, is required for cool sensing and thermosensing. It will be worth investigating whether one or more pharyngeal GRNs act to integrate information about temperature and chemical quality of food substrates (Chen, 2017).

    Expression analyses also hint at some functional subdivisions between pharyngeal taste organs. The LSO contains a smaller proportion of Gr-expressing neurons than the VCSO, which also expresses a larger number of Gr genes that are co-expressed with Gr66a. Thus, broader bitter taste function might be expected in the VCSO. By contrast, sweet taste function appears to be more dominant in the LSO; its sweet GRNs express more sweet Gr-GAL4 drivers than the ones in the VCSO, and their activation is sufficient to drive feeding preference. VCSO sweet GRNs fail to promote ingestion by themselves but may contribute to an increase in feeding preference when activated simultaneously with those in the LSO. Thus, there may be synergistic or hierarchical interactions between LSO and VCSO sweet taste circuits, with the latter coming into play only once the former is activated. The finding that Gr and Ir genes are expressed in the LSO and VCSO but only Ir genes in the DCSO is also striking and raises the possibility that the DCSO, which is present at the most internal location relative to the others, may serve a unique role in controlling ingestion (Chen, 2017).

    Based on its molecular signature, the V5 neuron was identified as an L-canavanine-sensing neuron in the pharynx. As predicted, feeding avoidance of L-canavanine is dependent on V5. It was thus unexpected that capsaicin-mediated activation of bitter pharyngeal GRNs, which include V5, did not induce strong feeding avoidance either in the absence or presence of sugar. Because the strength and pattern of pharyngeal neuronal activation by bitter tastants or capsaicin is unknown, it is possible that capsaicin response may be weaker than that of canonical bitter tastants. Alternatively, sweet and bitter inputs from internal and external neurons may be summed differently. It is known that activation of one or few external sweet neurons can lead to proboscis extension, for example, but a larger number of bitter neurons may need to be activated for avoidance (Chen, 2017).

    The afferents of pharyngeal GRNs target regions of the SEZ that are distinct from areas in which afferents from labellar and tarsal GRNs terminate. Interestingly, pharyngeal GRN projections between molecularly different classes of neurons, as well as between GRNs of the LSO and VCSO, are also distinct. Projections of sugar-sensing GRNs were found in separate ipsilateral regions, whereas those of neurons predicted to detect aversive tastants were found at the midline, suggesting the presence of contralateral termini. These observations may inform future functional studies of pharyngeal GRNs. L7-6 neurons, for example, would be predicted to sense aversive compounds based on the presence of their termini at the midline. Analysis of pharyngeal GRN projections also suggests distinct connectivity to higher order neuronal circuits. With the molecular tools described here, future investigations of pharyngeal GRNs and pharyngeal taste circuits will provide insight into how internal taste is integrated with external taste to control various aspects of feeding behavior (Chen, 2017).

    A luminal glycoprotein drives dose-dependent diameter expansion of the Drosophila melanogaster hindgut tube

    An important step in epithelial organ development is size maturation of the organ lumen to attain correct dimen/sions. This study shows that the regulated expression of Tenectin (Tnc) is critical to shape the Drosophila melanogaster hindgut tube. Tnc is a secreted protein that fills the embryonic hindgut lumen during tube diameter expansion. Inside the lumen, Tnc contributes to detectable O-Glycans and forms a dense striated matrix. Loss of tnc causes a narrow hindgut tube, while Tnc over-expression drives tube dilation in a dose-dependent manner. Cellular analyses show that luminal accumulation of Tnc causes an increase in inner and outer tube diameter, and cell flattening within the tube wall, similar to the effects of a hydrostatic pressure in other systems. When Tnc expression is induced only in cells at one side of the tube wall, Tnc fills the lumen and equally affects all cells at the lumen perimeter, arguing that Tnc acts non-cell-autonomously. Moreover, when Tnc expression is directed to a segment of a tube, its luminal accumulation is restricted to this segment and affects the surrounding cells to promote a corresponding local diameter expansion. These findings suggest that deposition of Tnc into the lumen might contribute to expansion of the lumen volume, and thereby to stretching of the tube wall. Consistent with such an idea, ectopic expression of Tnc in different developing epithelial tubes is sufficient to cause dilation, while epidermal Tnc expression has no effect on morphology. Together, the results show that epithelial tube diameter can be modelled by regulating the levels and pattern of expression of a single luminal glycoprotein (Syed, 2012).

    This study shows that the luminal glycoprotein Tnc promotes diameter expansion of the Drosophila hindgut in a dose-dependent manner. The domain organization of Tnc, its contribution to detectable O-glycans in the hindgut lumen and its ability to form a dense luminal matrix suggest that Tnc has mucin-like characteristics. A possible involvement of mucin-like molecules in tubulogenesis has previously been recognized. The Caenorhabditis elegans let-653 is a secreted protein with a PTS domain of around 90-200 amino acids, depending on the splice variant. In mutants for let-653, the single-celled excretory canals develop massively enlarged lumen by an as yet unknown mechanism. During cyst formation in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK), it has been suggested that the initial separation of apical membranes involves de-adhesive properties conferred by large apically localized glycoproteins. Candidate molecules are mucin 1 (MUC1) and the sialomucin Podocalyxin, which localize to the nascent lumens in MDCK cysts and in vivo. Recently, it was indeed shown that Podocalyxin is required to separate apical membranes during initial lumen formation in developing blood vessels. Podocalyxin is membrane-bound, and its negatively charged sialic acids are thought to cause electrostatic repulsion of the apical surfaces. Tnc does however appear to function differently from these mucin-like molecules, since it is not required for lumen formation per se, but drives the subsequent step of tube diameter expansion (Syed, 2012).

    The function of Tnc also differs from that of the chitinous matrix in the tracheal lumen, as the latter is not needed to increase the luminal volume during diameter expansion, but to shape a uniform diameter. A difference in action between the two luminal components is further supported by the slightly shorter tracheal tubes in tnc mutants, while loss of chitin causes too long tracheal tubes. It is proposed that Tnc-driven tube dilation represents a mechanism for shaping an epithelial tube, where the extent of tube wall extension and lumen volume expansion can be controlled by the intraluminal accumulation of a single protein (Syed, 2012).

    During wing development, Tnc is found basal to the epithelium and is proposed to act as a ligand for PS2 integrin via RGD motifs in the vWC-like domains. It is therefore possibly that luminal Tnc might cause tube wall remodelling by signalling through an apical cognate receptor(s). However, the results do not indicate a signalling function for Tnc: First, over-expression of Tnc in the hindgut causes an increase in tube diameter according to the levels of Tnc expression. Thus, a signaling function of Tnc would imply that Tnc is the limiting factor in the pathway. This is unlikely, since Tnc is abundant and fills the lumen of the wild type hindgut. Second, when Tnc was expressed at one side of the tube wall, all cells at the lumen perimeter were similarly affected. If Tnc signals via an apical receptor, the effects should be higher at the site of its secretion, given its strictly dose-dependent function. Third, the observed lumen-dependent function of Tnc implies that a putative receptor would have to be present in many epithelia in which Tnc is not normally expressed, but yet not ubiquitously, as Tnc had no effect on the epidermis (Syed, 2012).

    Tnc-driven lumen expansion causes an increase in inner and outer tube diameter, associated with epithelial flattening. It is known that luminal volume expansion upon a hydrostatic pressure causes similar effects, for example during inflation of the zebrafish brain ventricle, expansion of the mouse blastocyst and in vitro growth of renal cysts. The results would therefore comply with a mechanism whereby luminal accumulation of Tnc forces an increase in lumen volume and, thereby, expansion of the surrounding tube wall. Since luminal Tnc appears to be a major O-glycan with low mobility in the lumen, an attractive hypothesis is that Tnc forms supra-molecular complexes that cause volume expansion due to hydration of the attached O-glycans. Secretion of Tnc into a confined luminal space would then cause a pressure on the tube wall and lumen dilation. In an attempt to further evaluate if the effect of Tnc requires O-glycosylation of the PTS domains, hindgut morphology and the size of Tnc was examined in mutants that lack different glycosyl transferases. However, the results were inconclusive, showing effects on both Tnc levels and secretion (Syed, 2012).

    The current study also show that Tnc can steer regional differences in tube diameter expansion along the tube axis, according to its pattern of expression. Such a regional effect of Tnc presumably occurs during normal hindgut development, where the amount of Tnc produced by the small intestine is larger than the amount produced by large intestine. As a likely consequence, the small intestine undergoes a higher degree of diameter expansion than large intestine, and it also shows a larger reduction in diameter upon loss of Tnc (Syed, 2012).

    In summary, this study has shown that Tnc forms a lumen-spanning complex that drives expansion of the surrounding tube wall. The local and dose-dependent effect of Tnc on tube dilation illustrates that a single protein can model differential lumen diameter along a tube. A model is suggested were Tnc causes a luminal pressure upon secretion and promotes tube dilation according to its voluminous expansion. Since the lumen of different epithelial organs have been shown to exhibit dynamic patterns of glycan distribution during development, it is possible that glycan-rich luminal components have a broad importance in shaping developing epithelial organs (Syed, 2012).

    Chiral cell sliding drives left-right asymmetric organ twisting

    Polarized epithelial morphogenesis is an essential process in animal development. While this process is mostly attributed to directional cell intercalation, it can also be induced by other mechanisms. Using live-imaging analysis and a three-dimensional vertex model, 'cell sliding', a novel mechanism driving epithelial morphogenesis, was identified in which cells directionally change their position relative to their subjacent (posterior) neighbors by sliding in one direction. In Drosophila embryonic hindgut, an initial left-right (LR) asymmetry of the cell shape (cell chirality in three dimensions), which occurs intrinsically before tissue deformation, is converted through LR asymmetric cell sliding into a directional axial twisting of the epithelial tube. In a Drosophila inversion mutant showing inverted cell chirality and hindgut rotation, cell sliding occurs in the opposite direction to that in wild-type. Unlike directional cell intercalation, cell sliding does not require junctional remodeling. Cell sliding may also be involved in other cases of LR-polarized epithelial morphogenesis (Inaki, 2018).

    The morphogenesis of epithelial cell sheets in the absence of cell number change has been explained as a consequence of cell-shape changes and/or cell rearrangements. Regarding cell rearrangements, the cell intercalation in convergent extension, in which cells intercalate in a medial direction to induce cell sheets to elongate in an anterior-posterior direction, is well described. Directional cell intercalation is also important in the LR asymmetric rotation of the male genitalia in Drosophila. However, the present study revealed that the LR asymmetric rotation of the embryonic Drosophila hindgut is achieved by chiral cell sliding, in which cells change their relative position against their subjacent neighbors in one direction. In contrast to directional cell intercalation, this cell sliding does not necessarily require cell rearrangements. Indeed, a computer simulation in which cell-boundary remodeling was prohibited still rotated as well as the standard 3D vertex model hindgut. Thus, in the hindgut case, it is speculated that the accumulation of small chiral cell sliding events between adjacent cells in the hindgut epithelial tube are sufficient to induce the 90° rotation of the hindgut epithelial tube, because of the large difference between the radius and the height of this organ (Inaki, 2018).

    Considering that cell sliding and cell rearrangement may not be mutually exclusive, the definition of cell sliding may be extended. For example, theoretical models of Drosophila male genitalia rotation include the sliding motion of cells, although this mechanism also requires cell rearrangements, because a large amount of cell displacement takes place. In any event, for the dynamic cell events induced by cell chirality, cell sliding appears to drive the LR asymmetric rotation of tissues with or without cell intercalations. Thus, cell sliding may be a commonly used mechanism in LR asymmetric morphogenesis, although it has not been demonstrated to date (Inaki, 2018).

    Directional cell intercalation often requires a biased subcellular distribution of Myosin II. For example, during the LR asymmetric rotation of Drosophila genitalia, LR asymmetric cell intercalation is induced by the LR asymmetric distribution of Myosin II. However, in the Drosophila hindgut, a biased Myosin II distribution was not detected in fixed or live tissues. Given that chiral cell sliding requires a very small amount of change in the relative positions of cells, a large bias in the amount of Myosin II may not be required. Indeed, the simulation revealed that the anisotropic contraction of edges before but not during the rotation was sufficient to induce whole-organ rotation, whereas the anisotropic contraction of edges needs to be maintained in the computer simulation to recapitulate the rotation of Drosophila male genitalia (see Computer simulation of the hindgut epithelial tube using a 3D cell-based vertex model for tissues and cell chirality, recapitulating the in vivo situation). Thus, if there is any bias in the subcellular distribution of Myosin II, it might be too subtle to detect by the methods used. Alternatively, force-generating mechanisms other than the biased expression of Myosin II might be used in the LR asymmetric rotation of the hindgut (Inaki, 2018).

    The computer simulation recapitulated the LR directional axial rotation of the gut tube, which is driven by a mechanical force bias induced by cell chirality. Analyses of the model cells in the simulations suggested that the rotation of the model gut tube is achieved through two steps: the first is a deformation in the shape of each cell (loss of cell chirality) without a change in the relative positions of anterior-posterior neighboring cells, and the second is a change in the relative positions of anterior-posterior neighboring cells (called cell sliding in this study), which presumably drives the rotation of the model gut tube. Although the cell deformation and cell sliding temporally overlapped in part, the following observations suggested that these two events are mechanically distinct. First, the initiation of cell chirality loss mostly preceded the onset of cell sliding. The timing of the model gut tube rotation coincided with that of the cell sliding, but not of the cell chirality loss, suggesting that the rotation of the model gut tube involves two cellular dynamic steps. Second, in a simulation prohibiting the tube rotation, cell sliding did not occur, although the loss of cell chirality was still observed, indicating that the loss of cell chirality is not always coupled with cell sliding. Based on these results, it is speculated that the loss of cell chirality and the cell sliding are distinct mechanical processes (Inaki, 2018).

    The differences between the cell chirality loss and cell sliding could be explained by their distinct mechanical properties. In a simulation, the equalization of the initial anisotropic contractile force was the only source driving subsequent events. During the balancing processes, individual cells were deformed quickly; most of the deformation was achieved by t = 1.0, although the force balance had not yet been neutralized given that the deformation continued to t = 80.0 (see the Computer simulation). In vertex models, a viscoelastic property is generally reflected in the speed of the response upon a force application. Thus, it is speculated that changes in the relative positions of cells (cell sliding) slowly occurs after the major dissolution of cell chirality, due to the difference in viscoelastic properties of the individual cell versus the cell aggregate, until the initial anisotropy of the force was neutralized. In turn, completion of the cell sliding led to global stabilization of the model tube (Inaki, 2018).

    The conclusions about the mechanical properties of chiral cell sliding were based on the computer simulation. However, the ideas did not contradict the observations made in the embryonic hindgut in vivo. In this study, it was also found that the hindgut itself generates the active force for driving its rotation. Considering that cell chirality was observed before the hindgut rotation and was lost during the rotation in vivo, the cancelation of cell chirality is probably a primary driving force for the subsequent events including the cell sliding and hindgut rotation, in vivo. This result also excludes the possibility that the cell sliding is a consequence of hindgut rotation driven by an external force, further supporting the validity of the computer simulation for analyzing the relationship between cell chirality loss and cell sliding. In addition, the enantiomorphism of the initial cell chirality is correlated with the LR direction of the cell sliding, based on analyses of the LR inversion mutant, Myo31DF. Thus, the LR direction of the cell sliding appears to depend on the initial cell chirality. These results are consistent with the conclusions obtained from the computer simulations. In conclusion, it is proposed that chiral cell sliding is a cell dynamic mechanism that connects cell chirality with the LR asymmetric rotation of the hindgut tube (Inaki, 2018).

    In vertebrates, organ laterality is thought to be determined by the LR body axis established by Nodal cassette gene expressions, which is distinct from the mechanisms reported for Drosophila. However, a recent study revealed that LR asymmetry formation in the zebrafish heart does not depend on nodal gene expression. Moreover, explanted linear hearts of various species develop dextral looping in culture, suggesting that the heart LR asymmetry formation is tissue-intrinsic. In Drosophila, which lacks the Nodal cassette gene functions, various organs use cell chirality as a common strategy to establish LR asymmetry in a tissue-intrinsic manner, in the absence of an LR body axis. To date, cell chirality in tissues has been observed only in Drosophila. However, cell chirality has been reported in cultured cells, including those of vertebrates. Importantly, many cell types from various organs show a chiral cell shape. Therefore, cell chirality may play specific roles in the LR asymmetric organogenesis in vertebrates as well (Inaki, 2018).

    E and ID proteins regulate cell chirality and left-right asymmetric development in Drosophila

    How left-right (LR) asymmetry forms in the animal body is a fundamental problem in Developmental Biology. While the mechanisms for LR asymmetry are well studied in some species, they are still poorly understood in invertebrates. It has been shown that the intrinsic LR asymmetry of cells (designated as cell chirality) drives LR asymmetric development in the Drosophila embryonic hindgut, although the machinery of the cell chirality formation remains elusive. This study found that the Drosophila homolog of the Id gene, extra macrochaetae (emc), is required for the normal LR asymmetric morphogenesis of this organ. Id proteins, including Emc, are known to interact with and inhibit E-box-binding proteins (E proteins), such as Drosophila Daughterless (Da). The suppression of da by wild-type emc was essential for cell chirality formation and for normal LR asymmetric development of the embryonic hindgut. MyosinID (MyoID), which encodes the Drosophila Myosin ID protein, is known to regulate cell chirality. It was further shown that Emc-Da regulates cell chirality formation, in which Emc functions upstream of or parallel to MyoID. Abnormal Id-E protein regulation is involved in various human diseases. These results suggest that defects in cell shape may contribute to the pathogenesis of such diseases (Ishibashi, 2019).

    Maintenance of hindgut reabsorption during cold exposure is a key adaptation for Drosophila cold tolerance

    Maintaining extracellular osmotic and ionic homeostasis is crucial for organismal function. In insects, hemolymph volume and ion content is regulated by the secretory Malpighian tubules and reabsorptive hindgut. When exposed to stressful cold, homeostasis is gradually disrupted, characterized by a debilitating increase in extracellular K(+) concentration (hyperkalemia). Accordingly, studies have found a strong link between the species-specific cold tolerance and their ability to maintain ion and water homeostasis at low temperature. This is also true for drosophilids where inter- and intra-specific differences in cold tolerance are linked to the secretory capacity of Malpighian tubules. There is, however, little information on the reabsorptive capacity of the hindgut in Drosophila To address this, a novel method was developed that permits continued measurements of hindgut ion and fluid reabsorption in Drosophila. This assay is temporally stable (approximately 2 hours) and responsive to cAMP stimulation and pharmacological intervention in accordance with the current insect hindgut reabsorption model. Then, how cold acclimation or cold adaptation affected hindgut reabsorption at benign (24 degrees C) and low temperature (3 degrees C) was investigated. Cold tolerant Drosophila species and cold-acclimated D. melanogaster maintain superior fluid and Na(+) reabsorption at low temperature. Furthermore, cold adaptation and acclimation caused a relative reduction in K(+) reabsorption at low temperature. These characteristic responses of cold adaptation/ acclimation will promote maintenance of ion and water homeostasis at low temperature. This study of hindgut function therefore provides evidence to suggest that adaptations in osmoregulatory capacity of insects are critical for their ability to tolerate cold (Andersen, 2020).

    genes active in gut


    Andersen, M. K. and Overgaard, J. (2020). Maintenance of hindgut reabsorption during cold exposure is a key adaptation for Drosophila cold tolerance. J Exp Biol. PubMed ID: 31953360

    Chen, Y. D. and Dahanukar, A. (2017). Molecular and cellular organization of taste neurons in adult Drosophila pharynx. Cell Rep 21(10): 2978-2991. PubMed ID: 29212040

    Inaki, M., Hatori, R., Nakazawa, N., Okumura, T., Ishibashi, T., Kikuta, J., Ishii, M., Matsuno, K. and Honda, H. (2018). Chiral cell sliding drives left-right asymmetric organ twisting. Elife 7. PubMed ID: 29891026

    Ishibashi, T., Hatori, R., Maeda, R., Nakamura, M., Taguchi, T., Matsuyama, Y. and Matsuno, K. (2019). E and ID proteins regulate cell chirality and left-right asymmetric development in Drosophila. Genes Cells. PubMed ID: 30624823

    Lechner, H., Josten, F., Fuss, B., Bauer, R. and Hoch, M. (2007). Cross regulation of intercellular gap junction communication and paracrine signaling pathways during organogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 310: 23-34. PubMed ID: 17707365

    Luan, Z., Quigley, C. and Li, H. S. (2015). The putative Na(+)/Cl(-)-dependent neurotransmitter/osmolyte transporter Inebriated in the Drosophila hindgut is essential for the maintenance of systemic water homeostasis. Sci Rep 5: 7993. PubMed. PubMed ID: 25613130

    Singh, S. R., Zeng, X., Zheng, Z. and Hou, S. X. (2011). The adult Drosophila gastric and stomach organs are maintained by a multipotent stem cell pool at the foregut/midgut junction in the cardia (proventriculus). Cell Cycle 10(7): 1109-20. PubMed ID: 21403464

    Skaer, H. (1993). The Alimentary Canal. pp 941-1012. In "The Development of Drosophila melanogaster." Eds. M. Bate and A. Martinez Arias. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Syed, Z. A., Bouge, A. L., Byri, S., Chavoshi, T. M., Tang, E., Bouhin, H., van Dijk-Hard, I. F. and Uv, A. (2012). A luminal glycoprotein drives dose-dependent diameter expansion of the Drosophila melanogaster hindgut tube. PLoS Genet 8(8): e1002850. PubMed ID: 22876194

    date revised: 25 March 2015 

    Genes involved in organ development

    Home page: The Interactive Fly © 1995, 1996 Thomas B. Brody, Ph.D.

    The Interactive Fly resides on the
    Society for Developmental Biology's Web server.