InteractiveFly: GeneBrief

frayed: Biological Overview | Developmental Biology | Effects of Mutation |References


Gene name - frayed

Synonyms -

Cytological map position - 91B3--4

Function - signaling

Keywords - glia, peripheral nervous system

Symbol - fray

FlyBase ID: FBgn0023083

Genetic map position -

Classification - protein serine/threonine kinase - PAK family

Cellular location - cytoplasmic



NCBI links: Precomputed BLAST | Entrez Gene
BIOLOGICAL OVERVIEW

Frayed (Fray) is a serine/threonine kinase expressed by the peripheral glia of Drosophila, whose function is required for normal axonal ensheathment. Null fray mutants die early in larval development and have nerves with severe swelling and axonal defasciculation. The phenotype is associated with a failure of the ensheathing glia to correctly wrap peripheral axons. When the fray cDNA is expressed in the ensheathing glia of fray mutants, normal nerve morphology is restored. Fray belongs to a novel family of Ser/Thr kinases, the PF kinases, whose closest relatives are the PAK kinases. Rescue of the Drosophila mutant phenotype with PASK, the rat homolog of Fray, demonstrates a functional homology among these proteins and suggests that the Fray signaling pathway is widely conserved (Leiserson, 2000).

The larval peripheral nerves of Drosophila present an attractive system for analyzing the cellular interactions that underlie axon ensheathment and glial cell function. The nerves are relatively simple, having only three cellular components: (1) sensory and motor axons, (2) ensheathing glia that wrap the axons, and (3) perineurial cells that form the outermost cell layer. The glial ensheathment in Drosophila resembles that seen in neonatal mammals, where unmyelinated but glial-ensheathed axons predominate (Leiserson, 2000 and references therein).

In Drosophila, mutations that have been found to affect the ensheathment of peripheral axons include neurexin IV and gliotactin (gli). Neurexin IV is a transmembrane protein that localizes to pleated septate junctions, which are found in nerve-ensheathing cells of Drosophila and are required for the formation of the blood-nerve barrier. In neurexin IV mutants, pleated septate junctions fail to form, and the blood-nerve barrier is absent. The gli gene is expressed in the ensheathing glial cells and encodes a transmembrane protein with an inactive serine esterase domain, presumed to be a signaling receptor. In gli mutants, the ensheathment fails to encase the axons of the nerve bundle, giving support to the idea that Gli normally functions as a signaling molecule mediating a cell recognition event (Leiserson, 2000).

The major innervation of each larval abdominal hemisegment is provided by a single nerve that exits from the lateral edge of the ganglionic hemisegment and inserts into the bodywall at the edge of the ventral oblique muscle fiber 17, near the ventral midline of the target segment. Once the nerve reaches the bodywall, it subdivides into five branches running from ventral to dorsal. These branches correspond to the embryonically established projections of the intersegmental and segmental nerves within the bodywall. A second, minor innervation of the bodywall is provided by the segmentally repeated transverse nerves, which emerge from the ganglion's dorsal midline and project bilaterally. At the bodywall, the transverse nerve runs from ventral to dorsal along the segment border and terminates at the alary muscle. Each of the larval peripheral nerves in segments A2–A7 contain approximately 85–90 afferent and efferent axons. The most posterior peripheral nerve projects to the compound A8-11 hemisegment of the larva and as a result has a diameter about 50% larger than the other abdominal nerves (Leiserson, 2000).

The development of an abdominal peripheral nerve begins with the pioneering of the intersegmental and segmental axon tracts during stage 13 of embryogenesis. These two nerve tracts join at the edge of the CNS to form a single peripheral nerve trunk, which will elongate for the rest of embryonic and larval development. Ensheathment of the nerve involves two distinct cell migrations. The first involves glial cells from the CNS, which migrate outward onto the nerve and establish the axonal ensheathment. These cells are derived from the 'exit glia' clusters, which are located adjacent to the nerve roots. By stage 16, six to eight peripheral ensheathing glia are arrayed along the nerve and have begun to elaborate processes. The other migration involves the perineurial cells, which are thought to be of mesodermal origin and form the outermost cell layer of the nerve. By the end of the third instar, the larval peripheral nerves can exceed 3 mm in length. To accommodate this growth, the perineural cells undergo postembryonic proliferation, as revealed by bromodeoxyuridine birth-dating experiments. In contrast, the ensheathing glial cells do not proliferate postembryonically and accommodate nerve growth by extending progressively longer processes (Leiserson, 2000).

The only abnormalities observed by light microscopy in fray mutants are localized bulges or swellings in the nerves, inside of which extensive axon defasciculation is observed. This is referred to as the 'frayed nerve' phenotype. Detailed ultrastructural analysis has revealed that the fray phenotype also involves other, nonbulging regions of the nerve. To better understand the cellular basis of the fray phenotype, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to compare wild-type and mutant nerves. A hallmark of wild-type nerves is that axons are usually fully ensheathed by glial processes. The glial processes normally remain in close apposition to the neurons as they encircle them and in this way enclose and isolate the axons. TEM sections of mutant larval nerves reveals extensive errors in the glial ensheathment of axons, defects that are observed in both the bulging and nonbulging regions of the nerve (Leiserson, 2000).

The nonbulging regions of nerves, which have normal nerve diameters and would thus appear normal by light microscopy, in fact have extensive defects when examined by TEM. The mutant phenotype in these regions consists of glial processes that have begun to extend circumferentially around the axons but have fallen short of fully wrapping them. The proportion of ensheathing glial processes that fully encircle axons in mutants averages only 49.2% ± 2.6% of the total length of glial processes, compared to over 85.0% ± 5.5% in wild-type nerves. Strikingly, the total length of the glial processes in mutants does not differ significantly from wild-type. Other glial errors include sites in the nerve where from three to seven glial processes converge to within half a micron but nevertheless fail to join up with each other. These aberrant sites are never observed in wild-type nerves but are seen in mutants an average of 2.75 cases per nerve section (Leiserson, 2000).

Like the nonbulging regions, bulging regions of mutant nerves contain disrupted glial ensheathment of axons, as revealed by TEM. Glial processes in some cases stretch out to contact the axons, but they consistently fail to encircle them. In addition to the glial defects, however, the bulging regions contained large, electron-transparent regions, which are presumably fluid filled. The axons are severely defasciculated, consistent with the light microscope observations. In contrast, the axons appear normal in number, though their average axon diameter is slightly reduced compared to wild-type axons. The reduced axon size is likely a systemic effect, since the mutant larvae at this stage are also smaller than wild-type. Otherwise, all of the cellular components of a normal nerve are present in the bulges: the outer perineurial cells, the ensheathing glia, and the axons. The perineurial layer in the bulging regions appears normal and uninterrupted, with a secreted neural lamella. In light of the glial cell defects observed in nonbulging regions, the most striking feature of the bulges is the disrupted glial ensheathment of axons. Indeed, besides the deformation introduced by the bulge, the mutant nerve phenotype is largely specific to the glial cells (Leiserson, 2000).

Whether the fray phenotype was associated with aberrant growth of the glia, especially in the bulging regions, was examined. Surprisingly, there was no statistically significant difference in the total length of glial processes (observed in individual transverse sections) between the bulging and nonbulging regions of mutant nerves. The glial length was also not significantly different from the value observed in wild-type nerves. These results suggest that the fray defect is not associated with an aberrant size of ensheathing glia that results in nerve bulges but rather is associated with a failure of the glial processes to fully surround and ensheath the axons, a defect seen irrespective of whether there is a bulge or not (Leiserson, 2000).

A simple interpretation of these results is that Fray participates in a signal transduction cascade within glial cells. In its absence, signal transduction is disrupted, resulting in the frayed nerve phenotype. The idea that Fray functions in a signaling pathway stems from the kinase domain within the sequence of the fray gene. That Fray is a bona fide Ser/Thr kinase follows both from the sequence, which contains all the hallmarks of a kinase domain, and from the strong homology to rat PASK (74% amino acid identity), which has been shown to have kinase activity in vitro (Leiserson, 2000).

Because glial defects are observed throughout the nerve, even in areas lacking pronounced bulges, the view is favored that the primary defect in fray mutants is incorrect wrapping of axons by glial cell processes. In this view, the bulges appear as a secondary consequence, perhaps from the lack of structural integrity caused by the improper wrapping of axons (Leiserson, 2000).

This model is consistent with reports of PF kinases associating with the cytoskeleton. Embryos that lack maternal fray have abnormal mitotic spindles, suggesting that Fray plays a role in the cytoskeleton of dividing nuclei (Petitt, 1998). Furthermore, rat PASK has been shown to associate with the cytoskeleton in vivo and to associate with the cytoskeleton in vitro when induced by stress (Tsutsumi, 2000). In light of these results, together with the finding that glial processes are malformed in fray mutants, it seems likely that, in glial cells, Fray also regulates some aspect of the cytoskeleton. However, Fray does not simply regulate the overall size of the glial cell but rather specifically affects the ensheathing behavior of glial cell processes, in that they fail to (completely) encircle axons (Leiserson, 2000).

Some clues to Fray function are evident from the sequence. The Fray kinase domain is related to those of PAK kinases (see Drosophila PAK-kinase), which have been shown to effect changes in the cytoskeleton in response to the stress-activated pathway. Upon activation by GTPases of the rho family, PAKs mediate changes in cell shape by acting on components of the cytoskeleton or by causing changes in gene expression. However, Fray and other PF kinases lack the motif found in canonical PAKs that permits binding to rho GTPases. Thus, PF kinases probably do not interact with these GTPases and probably have distinct molecular partners and functions (Leiserson, 2000).

By analogy to other kinases, the regulatory region of Fray is likely to be in the C-terminal half of the protein. In this same segment are found the two PF domains, which are stretches of homology among PF kinases. These PF domains are likely to represent regions that mediate protein-protein interactions, serving to regulate the activity or localization of the kinase. Consistent with this idea, it has been reported that PASK can specifically associate with F-actin via a region that includes the PF1 domain, presumably through an intermediary protein (Tsutsumi, 2000). Whatever proteins PASK interacts with, the fact that it can complement fray suggests PASK can interact with the appropriate Drosophila proteins via its regulatory and catalytic domains (Leiserson, 2000).

While the biological roles of the mammalian homologs of Fray have not been reported, these studies indicate there are multiple functions of Fray in Drosophila. In addition to the glial cell function in nerves, Fray has a maternal role, a vital function, and roles in imaginal development suggested by the rescue experiments (Leiserson, 2000 and references therein). In a selective rescue experiments, the lethal and nerve phenotypes were differently affected. For example, a heat shock driver rescues larval lethality without fully rescuing the nerve phenotype. These experiments show that the failure of mutant larvae to survive is not due solely to their frayed nerves. That Fray has distinct roles in imaginal development follows from the observation of abnormal wings, legs, eyes, and bristles in mutants that have been partially rescued and survived to adult. Thus, the signaling pathway or pathways in which the Fray kinase participates appear to be employed in multiple times and places in Drosophila development (Leiserson, 2000).

In mammals, the wide expression of Fray homologs points to multiple roles of PF kinases. In the rat, most adult tissues express PASK, including the nervous system, kidney, adrenal glands, and stomach. In mouse and human embryos, cDNAs have been isolated from developing brain and heart. In adults, Fray homologs are found in mammary gland and thymus. It is not yet known if PF kinases are involved in mammalian axonal ensheathment or if they are expressed by Schwann cells. In light of the functional homology found between Drosophila Fray and mammalian PASK, however, it seems clear that PF kinases play essential roles in mammalian as well as arthropod development (Leiserson, 2000).


DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY

Embryonic

fray expression was examined using both the enhancer trap reporter and tissue in situ hybridization. The overall expression patterns observed using these assays were similar. Expression of fray is first apparent in preblastoderm embryos, consistent with a maternal contribution. Zygotic expression is first observed in stage 12 embryos, in anterior and posterior regions that will develop into the gut. By stage 15, the proventriculus and hindgut show very high expression, while cells of the midgut show moderate expression. In the abdominal bodywall, only muscle fiber 17 is stained. Just outside the CNS, the dorsal median cells in the thoracic segments show expression. These cells, mesodermal in origin, located on the dorsal midline of the CNS, have been shown to pioneer the transverse nerve, and are thought to function like glia. By stage 17, all the thoracic and abdominal dorsal median cells are stained, as are muscle fiber 17 and the gut (Leiserson, 2000).

The expression most relevant to the nerve phenotype is found in a set of cells associated with the CNS nerve roots. Based on their location and by their coexpression of Repo, a glial-specific transcription factor, it is concluded that these fray-positive cells are the exit glia, the cells that give rise to the peripheral ensheathing glia. Later in development, expression is observed in a small subset of nerve-associated cells (Leiserson, 2000).

The restriction of the nerve phenotype and fray expression to ensheathing glia suggests that Fray plays an essential role in these cells for normal axonal ensheathment. To investigate this, rescue experiments were undertaken using GAL4 enhancer trap lines to restore Fray expression in different subsets of cells in a mutant background. Ubiquitous expression of the fray cDNA is able to rescue the nerve bulge phenotype and the larval lethal phenotype. Three drivers with expression in peripheral glial cells are all able to rescue the mutant nerve phenotype, providing strong evidence that Fray is required in peripheral glial cells for normal nerve ensheathment (Leiserson, 2000).

The rescue experiments also provided evidence for other developmental roles of Fray, besides glial ensheathment of axons. Driving expression with a weak, constitutive driver produces adults that have visible defects, such as reduced wings, eyes, and legs and abnormally patterned bristles. In contrast, a strong constitutive driver fully rescues the mutant phenotype. Driving fray expression with either driver in a wild-type background produces normal-looking adults, suggesting that the visible defects are due to loss of function of fray and not the result of the overexpression of the rescue construct (Leiserson, 2000).


EFFECTS OF MUTATION

The fray gene was discovered in an enhancer trap screen in which line PZ4624 expressed the reporter lacZ gene in the embryonic neuromuscular system as well as in the midline dorsal median cells. To clone the gene, a genomic clone was isolated from the region by plasmid rescue, which was used to initiate a chromosomal walk through the region. Screening by tissue in situ hybridization, a genomic fragment was identified that reveals a pattern of mRNA expression that mirrors the enhancer trap reporter gene expression (Leiserson, 2000).

Three mutant alleles of the gene (denoted r1, r2, and r3) were isolated by excising the P element from line PZ4624. All three mutations result in lethality by the late third instar larval stage, fail to complement one another, and exhibit similar nerve phenotypes. Subsequently, another allele was obtained from the same enhancer trap screen, PZ7551, which is an insertion into the 5' region of the transcription unit and results in larval lethality during the first and second instars (Leiserson, 2000).

To learn whether fray plays an important role in the nervous system, fillet preparations of third instar mutants, labeled with the neuronal marker anti-HRP, were examined. The only abnormalities observed by light microscopy were localized bulges or swellings in the nerves, inside of which extensive axon defasciculation was observed. This is referred to as the 'frayed nerve' phenotype. Detailed ultrastructural analysis has revealed that the fray phenotype also involves other, nonbulging regions of the nerve (Leiserson, 2000).

The fray mutation is 100% penetrant; bulges and associated axon defasciculation were found in every larva examined. By light microscopy, the defects appear localized, ranging from mild bulging to immense bulges that can exceed 300 µm in length and 50 µm in diameter. The number of these bulges ranges from 8 to 22 per animal. The neuron-specific anti-HRP labeling within the large bulges reveals defasciculated axons. In contrast, in wild-type larvae, nerves are of uniform width (7 µm) with straight and tightly bundled axons, as revealed by anti-HRP labeling and electron microscopy (Leiserson, 2000).

Directly imaging live larvae through the cuticle with enhanced video microscopy reveals frayed nerves in recently hatched first instar larvae, indicating that the bulges arise early in development. Using this same technique, the same phenotype was observed in mutants bearing the severe allele PZ7551; such mutants die before the end of the second instar. The similarity in phenotype suggested that the frayed nerve phenotype in hypomorphs is not a secondary effect but is closely linked to the loss of fray function (Leiserson, 2000).

By labeling the nuclei in third instar fray mutant peripheral nerves, it was possible to examine whether the nerve bulges result from a loss of the ensheathing perineurial cells, leading to the weakening and hence bulging of the nerve. Since the perineurial cells far outnumber the six to eight ensheathing peripheral glia in each nerve, the vast majority of the nuclei labeled in these preparations are perineurial. The perineurial layer was found to be continuous; perineurial nuclei are associated with the bulges, suggesting that the bulges are not due to openings in the ensheathment or to localized cell loss. This result is in agreement with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis that shows that the perineurial layer is continuous, even in the largest bulges (Leiserson, 2000).

No strict relation between the presence of a bulge and its location along the nerve was found. Bulges were found in every nerve and in nearly every segment. There was, however, a higher tendency for bulges to occur near the ventral ganglion. For the A8 nerve, a second hot spot was found at the levels of segments A6 and A7 (Leiserson, 2000).

The extensive homology among members of the PF kinase family suggests that they are functional homologs. To test this, a rat PASK cDNA was used to see whether it could substitute for fray function in fray mutants. The rat homolog was chosen over other mammalian homologs because it had already been characterized and had been demonstrated to possess kinase activity in vitro. For these experiments, the two strongest GAL4 drivers were selected; they exhibit essentially complete rescue of the fray lethal and nerve phenotypes when driving expression of the Drosophila fray cDNA. Expressing PASK using either of these drivers reduces the severity of the fray lethal phenotype, as evidenced by a shift of the lethal phase from larva to pupa. The degree of rescue obtained with PASK is less than that obtained using the Drosophila cDNA. Remarkably, these results show that, despite being separated by hundreds of millions of years of evolution, rat PASK is capable of substituting for fray function (Leiserson, 2000).

Gli is a receptor with an inactive serine esterase domain, whose molecular function is unknown but has been hypothesized to participate in signal transduction. Because a kinase such as Fray almost certainly has a signal transduction function, it would be of interest to see whether Fray and Gli operate in the same signaling cascade. Toward this end, evidence of genetic interactions between the two genes was sought by comparing the phenotype of a hypomorphic mutant with or without a severe allele of the other gene. No evidence of genetic interaction has yet been found. For example, the mutant phenotypes of frayr1/frayr1;gliAEDelta45/+ and frayr1/frayr1;+/+ animals appear indistinguishable -- both survive to the third instar and have the frayed nerve phenotype. If fray and gli operate in separate pathways, one would not expect them to interact genetically. The lack of a genetic interaction, however, could be due to other factors and by itself does not rule out the possibility that they function in the same pathway (Leiserson, 2000).


REFERENCES

Search PubMed for articles about Drosophila frayed

Leiserson, W. M., Harkins, E. W. and Keshishian, H. (2000). Fray, a Drosophila serine/threonine kinase homologous to mammalian PASK, is required for axonal ensheathment. Neuron 28: 793-806. 11163267

Petitt, M., Melnick, M. and Perrimon, N. (1998). The Drosophila gene fray encodes a STE20-related kinase that controls multiple microtubule-based movements. Molec. Biol. Cell 9: 43a

Tsutsumi, T., Ushiro, H., Kosaka, T., Kayahara, T. and Nakano, K. (2000). Proline- and alanine-rich Ste20-related kinase associates with F-actin and translocates from the cytosol to cytoskeleton upon cellular stresses. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 9157-9162. 10734050


Biological Overview

date revised: 30 June 2001

Home page: The Interactive Fly © 2017 Thomas Brody, Ph.D.