Semaphorin-2a

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY

Embryonic

See the embryonic expression pattern of Sema-2a at the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project Patterns of Gene Expression Site.

SEMA II mRNA is expressed at high levels in a small subset of CNS neurons, at high levels in a single T3 muscle, and in the gonad. Several anterior sensory structures are stained (Kolodkin, 1993).

Effects of Mutation or Deletion

Mutants for Sema-2a show a greatly reduced eclosion, flightlessness and other behavioral defects, and death 2 days after adult eclosion. The surviving adults have normal wings, which they hold in the normal resting posture; however, shortly before dying, many hold their wings up. They can walk and jump, but they do not fly, even after a jump. The mutant adult flies are also abnormal in a visual orientation test, even though they are normal in a phototaxis test, showing that they are not blind. There are no gross abnormalities in the overall patterning of axon pathways in Sema-2a mutant embryos (Kolodkin, 1993)

The molecular mechanisms controlling the ability of motor axons to recognize their appropriate muscle targets were dissected using Drosophila genetics to add or subtract Netrin A, Netrin B, Semaphorin II, and Fasciclin II, either alone or in combination. Discrete target selection by neurons might be specified in a point-to-point fashion such that each motor axon and its appropriate target have unique and complementary molecular labels. Alternatively, specificity might emerge from a dynamic and comparative process in which growth cones respond to qualitative and quantitative molecular differences expressed by neighboring targets and make their decisions based on the relative balance of attractive and repulsive forces. Fas II and Sema II are expressed by all muscles where they promote (Fas II) or inhibit (Sema II) promiscuous synaptogenesis. The level of Sema II expression, while not enough to stop growth cones from exploring their environment, nevertheless provides a threshold that specific attractive signals must overcome in order to permit synapse formation. Decreasing Sema II leads to an increase in innervation. In the absence of Sema II, targeting errors occur, usually in the form of additional ectopic connections to neighboring muscles, although in some cases the absence of the normal connection or inappropriate choice point decisions are observed as well. Increasing Sema II leads to a decrease in innervation. It is concluded that growth cones in this system apparently do not rely solely on single molecular labels on individual targets. Rather, these growth cones assess the relative balance of attractive and repulsive forces and select their targets based on the combinatorial and simultaneous input of multiple cues. Apparently a relative balance model is more valid in this system than a lock-and-key model (Winberg, 1998).

The modest and dynamic level of Fas II helps adjust the threshold for innervation. Prior to synapse formation, Fas II is expressed at a low level across the entire surface of the muscle, making it permissive for growth cone exploration and synapse formation. As the first synapse forms on a muscle, the Fas II level dramatically plummets over the muscle surface while Fas II clusters under the developing synapse. The first successful synapse leads to a rapid reduction in this general attractant, thereby shifting the relative balance in favor of Sema II-mediated repulsion and thus raising the hurdle over which attractive signals must pass in order to promote further synapse formation. In this way, the innervated muscle becomes more refractory to further innervation. Fas II, as a modulator of the balance of attraction and repulsion, becomes a temporal measure of the muscle's synaptic history (Winberg, 1998).

While Sema II generally prevents exuberant synapse formation, it can also play an important role in patterning connections. For example, the two axons that pioneer the transverse nerve (TN) normally meet and fasciculate near muscle 7. In the absence of Sema II, these axons often innervate muscles 7 and 6, and sometimes fail to fasciculate with one another. In this case, Sema II provides a repulsive force (from muscles 7 and 6) at a specific choice point, and in its absence, the TN growth cones make a different decision. Similarly, as the lateral branch of the segmental nerve branch a (SNa) extends posteriorly, one axon branch innervates muscle 5 while another continues posteriorly to innervate muscle 8. In the absence of Sema II, both sometimes stop and innervate muscle 5. In this case, Sema II provides a key repulsive force (from muscle 5) at a specific choice point, and in its absence, the growth cone that usually innervates muscle 8 instead makes a different decision. Both examples show how Sema II can do more than simply sharpen the pattern of innervation; Sema II can also influence specific targeting decisions in a dosage-dependent fashion. The Sema II experiments show that the pattern of expression (i.e., the differential levels expressed by neighboring muscles) can be more important than the absolute level. Simply increasing Sema II on all muscles has little influence on the SNa. But increasing Sema II expression on muscle 5 and not its neighboring muscles does influence the SNa axons, presumably because it presents these axons with a sharp repulsive boundary. This differential expression prevents the lateral branch of the SNa from extending towards muscles 5 and 8 (Winberg, 1998).

The netrins were initially discovered as long-range chemoattractants that are secreted by midline cells and that attract commissural growth cones toward the midline. Netrins might have another function, and strong evidence is presented supporting this notion. In addition to their CNS midline expression and function in axon guidance, NetA and NetB are also expressed by distinct subsets of muscles where they function as short-range target recognition molecules. Genetic analysis suggests that both types of Netrin-mediated attractive responses (i.e., pathfinding and targeting) require Frazzled, the DCC/UNC-40-like Netrin receptor. In contrast, Fra is not required for NetB-mediated repulsion of the segmental nerve. Even though they are expressed by distinct subsets of muscles and function as target recognition molecules, the two netrins, NetA and NetB, do not act alone in specifying any one of these muscle targets. NetB is expressed by muscles 7 and 6, but NetB is not the sole attractant used by RP3 to innervate these muscles. In the absence of NetB, in 35% of segments RP3 makes the correct pathfinding decisions in the periphery but fails to innervate muscles 7 and 6 properly. However, in the other 65% of segments it does innervate muscles 7 and 6. Clearly, other unknown cues must play a major role in this targeting decision. One potential candidate for an additional targeting cue is the Ig CAM Fasciclin III. However, removal of FasIII does not alter the penetrance of the RP3 phenotype of Netrin or frazzled mutants. NetB functions within the context of the relative balance of general attractants and repellents such as Fas II and Sema II. For example, since the TN axons are attracted by NetB, and muscles 7 and 6 express NetB, why do the TN axons not synapse on muscles 7 and 6? Evidently, they are sufficiently repelled by Sema II to prevent inappropriate synapse formation. Either increasing the level of NetA or NetB or decreasing the level of Sema II leads to ectopic TN synapses. The choice of synaptic partner by TN axons is controlled by the balance of NetB in relation to Sema II and Fas II (Winberg, 1998).

Distinct classes of motor axons respond differentially to NetA and NetB While all motor axons in this system appear to be attracted by Fas II and repelled by Sema II, the different types of motor axons respond differently to NetA and NetB. NetB is expressed by a subset of muscles (7 and 6) where it strongly attracts appropriate (RP3) axons, more weakly attracts certain inappropriate (TN) axons, and repels other inappropriate (SN) axons. RP3 and TN axons can also be strongly attracted by NetA, while SN axons are apparently indifferent to NetA. The TN axons display a stronger responsiveness to NetA than to NetB, as judged by the frequency of ectopic innervation of ventral muscles overexpressing either Netrin. This difference may make biological sense, as TN axons normally extend toward a dorsal stripe of epithelial cells expressing NetA but grow past NetB-expressing ventral muscles without innervating them (Winberg, 1998).

Although all of the molecular signals used for this targeting system are not yet known, four key components have been identified: the pan-muscle expression of Fas II and Sema II and the muscle-specific expression of NetA and NetB. Analysis of these four genes shows that the signals they encode are potent, function as short-range signals in a dosage-dependent fashion, and work in combinations that either amplify or antagonize one another. Fas II and Sema II help control the fidelity and precision of the targeting system, while NetA and NetB provide muscle-specific targeting cues. These results suggest that target selection in this system is not based on absolute attractants or repellents that either ensure or prevent synapse formation, but rather it is based on the balance of attractive and repulsive forces on any given target cell in relationship to its neighboring cells. Targeting molecules such as Netrins, Semaphorins, and IgCAMs sometimes function as antagonists and sometimes as collaborators. This model of target selection is very similar to the current view of axon guidance in terms of a relative balance of attractive and repulsive forces (Winberg, 1998).

Adams, R. H., et al. (1997). The chemorepulsive activity of secreted semaphorins is regulated by furin-dependent proteolytic processing. EMBO J. 16(20): 6077-86.

Anderson, C. N. G., et al. (2003). Molecular analysis of axon repulsion by the notochord. Development 130: 1123-1133. 12571104

Ayoob, J. C., Terman, J. R. and Kolodkin, A. L. (2006). Drosophila Plexin B is a Sema-2a receptor required for axon guidance. Development 133: 2125-2135. PubMed citation: 16672342

Bates, D., et al., (2003). Neurovascular congruence results from a shared patterning mechanism that utilizes Semaphorin3A and Neuropilin-1. Dev. Bio. 255: 77-98. 12618135

Bates, K. E. and Whitington, P. M. (2007). Semaphorin 2a secreted by oenocytes signals through plexin B and plexin A to guide sensory axons in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 302(2): 522-35. PubMed citation: 17109838

Castellani, V., et al. (2000). Analysis of the L1-deficient mouse phenotype reveals cross-talk between Sema3A and L1 signaling pathways in axonal guidance. Neuron 27: 237-249

Castro, F., et al. (1999). Chemoattraction and chemorepulsion of olfactory bulb axons by different secreted semaphorins. J. Neurosci. 19(11): 4428-36.

Catalano, S. M., et al. (1998). Many major CNS axon projections develop normally in the absence of semaphorin III. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 11(4): 173-82.

Chen, H., et al. (1997). Neuropilin-2, a novel member of the neuropilin family, is a high affinity receptor for the semaphorins Sema E and Sema IV but not Sema III. Neuron 19(3): 547-59.

Chen H., et al. (1998). Semaphorin-neuropilin interactions underlying sympathetic axon responses to class III semaphorins. Neuron 21(6): 1283-90.

Cai, H, and Reed, R. R. (1999). Cloning and characterization of neuropilin-1-interacting protein: a PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 domain-containing protein that interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of neuropilin-1. J. Neurosci. 19(15): 6519-27.

Castellani, V., De Angelis. E., Kenwrick, S. and Rougon, G. (2002). Cis and trans interactions of L1 with neuropilin-1 control axonal responses to semaphorin 3A. EMBO J. 21: 6348-6357. 12456642

Chen, H., et al. (2000). Neuropilin-2 regulates the development of select cranial and sensory nerves and hippocampal mossy fiber projections. Neuron 25: 43-56. 10707971

Cheng, H. J., et al. (2001). Plexin-A3 mediates semaphorin signaling and regulates the development of hippocampal axonal projections. Neuron 32: 249-263. 11683995

Chiba, A., et al. (1995). Fasciclin III as a synaptic target recognition molecule in Drosophila. Nature 374: 166-168

Dalpé, G., et al. (2004). Conversion of cell movement responses to Semaphorin-1 and Plexin-1 from attraction to repulsion by lowered levels of specific RAC GTPases in C. elegans. Development 131: 2073-2088. 15073148

Eckhardt, F., et al. (1997). A novel transmembrane semaphorin can bind c-src. Mol Cell Neurosci 9(5/6): 409-19

Encinas, J. A., et al. (1999). Cloning, expression, and genetic mapping of Sema W, a member of the semaphorin family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96(5): 2491-2496.

Falk, J., et al. (2005). Dual functional activity of semaphorin 3B is required for positioning the anterior commissure. Neuron 48(1): 63-75. 16202709

Feiner, L., et al. (1997). Secreted chick semaphorins bind recombinant neuropilin with similar affinities but bind different subsets of neurons in situ. Neuron 19(3): 539-45.

Fujii, T., et al. (2002). Caenorhabditis elegans PlexinA, PLX-1, interacts with transmembrane semaphorins and regulates epidermal morphogenesis. Development 129: 2053-2063. 11959816

Giger, R. J., et al. (1998a). Anatomical distribution of the chemorepellent semaphorin III/collapsin-1 in the adult rat and human brain: predominant expression in structures of the olfactory-hippocampal pathway and the motor system. J. Neurosci. Res. 52(1): 27-42.

Giger, R. J., et al. (1998b). Neuropilin-2 is a receptor for semaphorin IV: insight into the structural basis of receptor function and specificity. Neuron 21(5): 1079-92.

Giger, R. J., et al. (2000). Guidance responses to secreted semaphorins. Neuropilin-2 is required in vivo for selective axon. Neuron 25: 29-41

Gitler, A. D. Lu, M. M. and Epstein, J. A. (2004). PlexinD1 and Semaphorin signaling are required in endothelial cells for cardiovascular development. Dev. Cell 7: 107-116. 15239958

Goshima, Y., et al. (1995). Collapsin-induced growth cone collapse mediated by an intracellular protein related to UNC-33. Nature 376: 509-514

Goshima, Y., et al. (1997). A novel action of collapsin: collapsin-1 increases antero- and retrograde axoplasmic transport independently of growth cone collapse. J. Neurobiol. 33(3): 316-28.

Hahn, A. C. and Emmons, S. W. (2003). The roles of an ephrin and a semaphorin in patterning cell-cell contacts in C. elegans sensory organ development. Dev. Biol. 256: 379-388. 12679110

He, Z. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1997). Neuropilin is a receptor for the axonal chemorepellent Semaphorin III. Cell 90(4): 739-751.

Henke-Fahle, S., Beck, K.-W. and Püschel, A. W. (2001). Differential responsiveness to the chemorepellent Semaphorin 3A distinguishes ipsi- and contralaterally projecting axons in the chick midbrain. Dev. Bio. 237: 381-397. 11543622

Ikegami, R., et al. (2004). Integration of Semaphorin-2A/MAB-20, ephrin-4, and UNC-129 TGF-ß signaling pathways regulates sorting of distinct sensory rays in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 6: 383-395. 15030761

Isbister, C. M., et al. (1999). Discrete roles for secreted and transmembrane semaphorins in neuronal growth cone guidance in vivo. Development 126(9): 2007-2019.

Isbister, C. M., et al. (2003). Gradient steepness influences the pathfinding decisions of neuronal growth cones in vivo. J. Neurosci. 23: 193-202. PubMed citation: 12514216

Jin, Z. and Strittmatter, S. M. (1997). Rac1 mediates collapsin-1-induced growth cone collapse. J. Neurosci. 17(16): 6256-6263.

Kawasaki, T., et al. (1999). A requirement for neuropilin-1 in embryonic vessel formation. Development 126: 4895-4902.

Kawasaki, T., et al. (2002). Requirement of neuropilin 1-mediated Sema3A signals in patterning of the sympathetic nervous system. Development 129: 671-680. 11830568

Kitsukawa, T., et al. (1997). Neuropilin-semaphorin III/D-mediated chemorepulsive signals play a crucial role in peripheral nerve projection in mice. Neuron 19(5): 995-1005.

Klostermann, A., et al. (1998). The chemorepulsive activity of the axonal guidance signal semaphorin D requires dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 273(13): 7326-31.

Kobayashi, H., et al. (1997). A role for collapsin-1 in olfactory and cranial sensory axon guidance. J. Neurosci. 17(21): 8339-8352.

Kolodkin, A. L., Matthes, D. J., O'Connor, T. P., Pate, N. H., Admon, A., Bentley, D. and Goodman, C. S. (1992). Fasciclin IV: sequence, expression and function during growth cone guidance in the grasshopper embryo. Neuron 9: 831-845.

Kolodkin, A. L. Matthes, D. J. and Goodman, C. S. (1993). The semiphorin genes encode a family of transmembrane and secreted growth cone guidance molecules. Cell 75: 1389-1399

Kolodkin, A. L., et al. (1997). Neuropilin is a semaphorin III receptor. Cell 90(4): 753-762.

Koppel, A. M., et al. (1997). A 70 amino acid region within the semaphorin domain activates specific cellular response of semaphorin family members. Neuron 19(3): 531-7.

Koppel, A. M. and Raper, J. A. (1998). Collapsin-1 covalently dimerizes, and dimerization is necessary for collapsing activity. J. Biol. Chem. 273(25): 15708-13.

Kuan, Y. S., Yu, H. H., Moens, C. B. and Halpern, M. E. (2007). Neuropilin asymmetry mediates a left-right difference in habenular connectivity. Development 134(5): 857-65. Medline abstract: 17251263

Kuhn, T. B., et al. (1999). Myelin and collapsin-1 induce motor neuron growth cone collapse through different pathways: inhibition of collapse by opposing mutants of rac1. J. Neurosci. 19(6): 1965-75.

Li, W., Herman, R. K. and Shaw, J. E., (1992). Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans axonal guidance and outgrowth gene unc-33. Genetics 132, 675-89

Luo, Y., et al. (1995). A family of molecules related to Collapsin in the embryonic chick nervous system. Neuron 14: 1131-40

Matthes, D. J., et al. (1995). Semaphorin II can function as a selective inhibitor of specific synaptic arborizations. Cell 81: 631-639. PubMed citation; Online text

Messersmith, E. K., et al. (1995). Semaphorin III can function as a selective chemorepellent to pattern sensory projections in the spinal cord. Neuron 14: 949-959

Minturn, J. E., et al. (1995). TOAD-64, a gene expressed early in neuronal differentiation in the rat, is related to unc-33, a C. elegans gene involved in axon outgrowth. J Neurosci 15: 6757-6766

Nakamura, F., et al. (1998). Neuropilin-1 extracellular domains mediate semaphorin D/III-induced growth cone collapse. Neuron 21(5): 1093-100.

Nose, A., Takeichi, M. and Goodman, C.S. (1994). Ectopic expression of connectin reveals a repulsive function during growth cone guidance and synapse formation. Neuron 13: 525-539

Nose, A., Umeda, T. and Takeichi, M. (1997). Neuromuscular target recognition by a homophilic interaction of Connectin cell adhesion molecules in Drosophila. Development 124 (8): 1433-1441.

Oster, S. F., et al. (2003). Invariant Sema5A inhibition serves an ensheathing function during optic nerve development. Development 130: 775-784. 12506007

Pasterkamp, R. J., et al. (1998). Evidence for a role of the chemorepellent semaphorin III and its receptor Neuropilin-1 in the regeneration of primary olfactory axons. J. Neurosci. 18(23): 9962-9976.

Püschel, A. W., Adams, R. H. and Betz, H. (1995). Murine semaphorin D/Collapsin is a member of a diverse gene family and creates domains inhibitory for axonal extension. Neuron 14: 941-948

Renzi, M. J., Wexler, T. L. and Raper, J. A. (2000). Olfactory sensory axons expressing a dominant-negative Semaphorin receptor enter the CNS early and overshoot their target. Neuron 28(2):437-47.

Roy, P. J., et al. (2000). mab-20 encodes Semaphorin-2a and is required to prevent ectopic cell contacts during epidermal morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 127: 755-767.

Schwarz, Q., et al. (2004). Vascular endothelial growth factor controls neuronal migration and cooperates with Sema3A to pattern distinct compartments of the facial nerve. Genes Dev. 18(22): 2822-34. 15545635

Sekido, Y., et al. (1996). Human semaphorins A(V) and IV reside in the 3p21.3 small cell lung cancer deletion region and demonstrate distinct expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 4120-4125

Shepherd, I. T. et al. (1997). A sensory axon repellent secreted from ventral spinal cord explants is neutralized by antibodies raised against collapsin-1. Development 124: 1377-1385

Shepherd, I. T. and Raper, J. A. (1999). Collapsin-1/Semaphorin D is a repellent for chick ganglion of remak axons. Dev. Biol. 212(1): 42-53.

Shoji, W., Yee, C. S. and Kuwada, J. Y. (1998). Zebrafish semaphorin Z1a collapses specific growth cones and alters their pathway in vivo. Development 125(7): 1275-83.

Skaliora, I., et al. (1998). Differential patterns of semaphorin expression in the developing rat brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10(4): 1215-29.

Suto, F., et al. (2007). Interactions between Plexin-A2, Plexin-A4, and Semaphorin 6A control lamina-restricted projection of hippocampal mossy fibers. Neuron 53: 535-547. Medline abstract: 17296555

Takahashi, T., Nakamura, F. and Strittmatter, S. M. (1997). Neuronal and non-neuronal collapsin-1 binding sites in developing chick are distinct from other semaphorin binding sites. J. Neurosci. 17(23): 9183-9193.

Takahashi, T., et al. (1998). Semaphorins A and E act as antagonists of neuropilin-1 and agonists of neuropilin-2 receptors. Nature Neurosci. 1(6): 487-493.

Takahashi. T., et al. (1999). Plexin-Neuropilin-1 complexes form functional Semaphorin-3A receptors. Cell 99: 59-69.

Tanelian, D. L., et al. (1997). Semaphorin III can repulse and inhibit adult sensory afferents in vivo. Nat. Med. 3(12): 1398-401.

Taniguchi, M., et al. (1997). Disruption of semaphorin III/D gene causes severe abnormality in peripheral nerve projection. Neuron 19(3): 519-30.

Torres-Vazquez, J., et al. (2004). Semaphorin-Plexin signaling guides patterning of the developing vasculature. Dev. Cell 7: 117-123. 15239959

Walz, A., Feinstein, P., Khan, M. and Mombaerts, P. (2007). Axonal wiring of guanylate cyclase-D-expressing olfactory neurons is dependent on neuropilin 2 and semaphorin 3F. Development 134(22): 4063-72. Medline abstract: 17942483

Watanabe, Y., Toyoda, R. and Nakamura, H. (2004). Navigation of trochlear motor axons along the midbrain-hindbrain boundary by neuropilin 2. Development 131: 681-692. 14729576

White, F. A. and Behar. O. (2000). The development and subsequent elimination of aberrant peripheral axon projections in Semaphorin3A null mutant mice. Dev. Biol. 225: 79-86.

Winberg, M. L., Mitchell, K. J. and Goodman, C. S. (1998). Genetic analysis of the mechanisms controlling target selection: complementary and combinatorial functions of netrins, semaphorins, and IgCAMs. Cell 93(4): 581-591.

Wong, J. T., Yu, W. T. and O'Connor, T. P. (1997). Transmembrane grasshopper Semaphorin I promotes axon outgrowth in vivo. Development 124: 3597-3607.

Wright, D. E., et al. (1995). The guidance molecule semaphorin III is expressed in regions of spinal cord and periphery avoided by growing sensory axons. J. Comp. Neurol. 361: 321-333

Xu, X., et al. (1998). Human semaphorin K1 is glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked and defines a new subfamily of viral-related semaphorins. J. Biol. Chem. 273(35): 22428-34.

Yuan, L., et al. (2002). Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice. Development 129: 4797-4806. 12361971

Zou, Y., et al. (2000). Squeezing axons out of the gray matter: A role for slit and semaphorin proteins from midline and ventral spinal cord. Cell 102: 363-375.

date revised: 17 April 2008 

Home page: The Interactive Fly © 1997 Thomas B. Brody, Ph.D.

The Interactive Fly resides on the
Society for Developmental Biology's Web server.