α-Tubulin at 67C: Biological Overview | Regulation | Developmental Biology | Effects of Mutation | References
Gene name - α-Tubulin at 67C

Synonyms - α4-Tubulin

Cytological map position- 67C4-67C4

Function - cytoskeleton

Keywords - cell cycle, rapid tubulin polymerization, early cleavage divisions

Symbol - αTub67C

FlyBase ID: FBgn0004236

Genetic map position - 2L

Classification - alpha-tubulin

Cellular location - cytoplasmic



NCBI link: EntrezGene
alphaTub67C orthologs: Biolitmine
BIOLOGICAL OVERVIEW

Although α4-tubulin comprises only about one-fifth of the α-tubulin pool in every Drosophila egg, in the absence of α4-tubulin - in eggs of the kavar0/- hemizygous females - only a tassel of short microtubules forms with two barely separated daughter centrosomes. α4-tubulin is enriched in the long microtubules that embrace the nuclear envelope, and it is suggested that they push apart daughter centrosomes along the nuclear perimeter during the initial cleavage divisions. In vitro tubulin polymerization showed that α4-tubulin is required for rapid tubulin polymerization. Since tubulin polymerization is slow inside eggs of the kavar0/- females, only short microtubules can form within the 4 to 5 minutes allowed for the process. A tassel of short microtubules with two barely separated centrosomes forms in every egg of the Kavar18c/+ females, in which the cytoplasm contains both wild-type and Kavar18c-encoded α4-tubulin with an E82K amino acid substitution (E82K-α4-tubulin). E82K-α4-tubulin is incorporated into the microtubules and renders them unstable. When injected into wild-type early cleavage embryos E82K-α4-tubulin slows down the formation of long microtubules and the separation of the daughter centrosomes. Surprisingly, when injected into late cleavage embryos E82K-α4-tubulin is non-toxic. Similarly, in the neuroblasts, ectopically expressed E82K-α4-tubulin becomes incorporated into the microtubules that grow sufficiently long and function normally (Venkei, 2006).

Embryos in the animal kingdom rely almost exclusively on maternally provided molecules at the very beginning of their life. Constituents of maternal effect are synthesized by the maternal genes and are deposited into the cytoplasm of the egg cell during oogenesis for future use in embryogenesis. To identify components of the egg cytoplasm required for the commencement of embryogenesis, use was made of the 'genetic-dissection' technique, in which dominant female-sterile (Fs) mutations of Drosophila were induced and isolated that allowed the formation of normal-looking and fertilized eggs; however, embryogenesis came to an arrest shortly after fertilization. It was anticipated that, if an Fs mutation prevents the commencement of embryogenesis, the product of a wild-type (+) gene that has been identified as Fs is involved in the process and molecular analysis of its function, and would therefore shed light on the beginning of a new life (Venkei, 2006).

The Kavar18c and the Kavar21g Fs mutations were used to identify the αTub67C gene (full name α-Tubulin at 67C) of Drosophila (Venkei, 2005), that encodes α4-tubulin, the so-called maternal isoform of the four α-tubulin isoforms. Although eggs of the Kavar18c/+ females appear normal and are fertilized as in wild type, embryogenesis soon comes to a standstill and a monopolar spindle appears in each of the 'die-at-start' embryos, with two nearby located centrosomes embedded in a tassel of 3-5 µm long, short and straight microtubules (Venkei, 2005). Kavar18c has been shown to be dominant-negative (Venkei, 2005), implying that the Kavar18c-encoded E82K-α4-tubulin molecules participate in the same process as wild-type α4-tubulin, such that E82K-α4-tubulin hinders function of wild-type α4-tubulin. It appears thus, that α4-tubulin is required for the formation of long microtubules (Venkei, 2006).

Second mutagenesis (by X-rays) of Kavar21g led to the formation of kavarrX21 (hereafter referred to as kavar0) the only known null-allele of the αTub67C gene (Venkei, 2005). A tassel of short and straight microtubules forms in every egg of the kavar0/- females that do not carry functional αTub67C genes (-indicates a short deficiency, which removes αTub67C and a few adjacent genes) (Venkei, 2005). The short microtubules are nucleated by two barely separated daughter centrosomes. The kavar0/- mutant phenotype clearly shows involvement of α4-tubulin in the formation of long microtubules and appropriate separation of the daughter centrosomes (Venkei, 2006).

In wild-type Drosophila embryo, the sperm-introduced basal body takes centrosome function and organizes the formation of long microtubules. Long microtubules compose the sperm aster and serve as route for shipment of the female pronucleus to close vicinity of the male pronucleus. They are also involved in separation of the daughter centrosomes, which migrate along the nuclear perimeter, as well as in the formation of the spindle apparatus in the early embryo. Their involvement has also been documented in the central and in the peripheral nervous systems of Drosophila embryos (Venkei, 2006).

The lack of long microtubules in eggs of the kavar0/- females is surprising, considering that α4-tubulin comprises only about 20% of the α-tubulin pool in the Drosophila eggs. The lack of α4-tubulin can not be substituted by another α-tubulin isoform (Matthews, 1989). Although there is plenty of α1-tubulin and α3-tubulin in every Drosophila egg - encoded by the constitutively expressed and evolutionary highly conserved αTub84B and αTub84D genes - they do not seem to support the formation of long microtubules. What makes α4-tubulin special? What is its function at the beginning of embryogenesis? Where is it localized in the early embryo? How do E84K-α4-tubulin molecules block the formation of long microtubules? This study used two mutant αTub67C alleles (Kavar18c and kavar0) to understand the role of α4-tubulin in the formation and function of long microtubules. It is shown that that α4-tubulin is accumulated in the long microtubules that embrace the nuclear envelope, and it is hypothesized that the vast majority of the force that pushes apart the daughter centrosomes to opposite poles along the nuclear perimeter comes from the fast-growing interpolar microtubules in the early cleavage embryos. It appears - based on results of in vitro tubulin-polymerization assays - that α4-tubulin is required for rapid formation of long microtubules. Since the time available for tubulin polymerization is very short during the initial cleavage divisions and tubulin polymerization proceeds slowly in absence of α4-tubulin, only short microtubules form, which do not support proper centrosome separation. It is also reported that the need for α4-tubulin is limited to the initial cleavage divisions. Once the cleavage nuclei populate the egg cortex, forces other than the growing interpolar microtubules accomplish separation of the daughter centrosomes. The ectopically expressed Kavar18c-encoded E82K-α4-tubulin molecules become incorporated into the microtubules, they do not disrupt microtubule-associated functions in imaginal disc and neuroblast cells (Venkei, 2006).

The previously described partial loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations in the αTub67C gene showed involvement of the α4-tubulin in oocyte meiosis, cleavage mitoses, formation of the sperm aster and in the embryonic central as well as in the peripheral nervous system (Theurkauf, 1992; Matthews, 1993; Máthé, 1998; Matthies, 1999). As described in this study, complete loss-of-function of αTub67C (in eggs of the kavar0/- hemizygous females) leads to the formation of short and straight microtubules, suggesting that α4-tubulin is required for the formation of long microtubules. The observation is rather astonishing because α4-tubulin comprises only about 20% of the α-tubulin pool in the Drosophila eggs (Matthews, 1989) leaving plenty of α-tubulin for the formation of microtubules. What makes α4-tubulin special? α4-tubulin is a rather divergent type of the four Drosophila α-tubulins: it shares only 67% (302 of 451) amino acid identity with the evolutionary highly conserved α1-tubulin isoform (Venkei, 2006).

However, to conclude that α4-tubulin is required for the formation of long microtubules, is superficial. In vitro polymerization of tubulins revealed that, once sufficient time is available for tubulin polymerization, microtubules of the similar length will form whether α4-tubulin is present or not. It might thus be concluded that α4-tubulin is required for rapid formation of the microtubules. It appears that, although tubulin polymerization starts in eggs of the kavar0/- females, it goes on far too slowly and, thus, the forming microtubules can not grow sufficiently long within the time available for the process. The time allowed for tubulin polymerization is limited by the Cyclin-Cdc-controlled cyclic sets of events that start during egg activation, whether the egg is fertilized or not. The lack of formation of sufficiently long microtubules leads to arrest of the cleavage cycles and the eventual death of the embryos. Similar 'out-of-phase' and 'behind-schedule-and-lost' types of events have already been reported during Drosophila embryogenesis. For example, in embryos defective in cytoplasmic dynein-heavy-chain function the replication cycle comes to an end soon after fertilization, whereas the centrosome cycles proceed normally (Venkei, 2006).

A remarkable feature of α4-tubulin is its apparent enrichment in the so-called interpolar microtubules that embrace the nuclear envelope. The interpolar microtubules interconnect the centrosomes and were proposed to participate in separation of the daughter centrosomes (Cytrynbaum, 2003; Scholey, 2003). In fact, since diameter of the nuclei is about 10 µm up to the ninth cleavage cycle, the interpolar microtubules need to be as long as 15-16 µm, when perfect geometrical parameters during interphase is a concern. Since duration of an early cleavage cycle is about 8 minutes, of which the interphase comprises about 4 minutes, the interpolar microtubules must grow 'fast' (with a speed of about 4 µm/minute) to fulfill their functions. Along progression, beyond the ninth cleavage cycle size of the nuclei decreases to about 5 µm and, correspondingly, the interpolar microtubules need to grow to only approximately 8 µm to extend over the opposite poles. Since length of the interphase in the cleavage cycle ten is approximately 6 minutes, the slow growth rate of microtubules of 1.3 µm/minute may be adequate for the formation of sufficiently long interpolar microtubules (Venkei, 2006).

The lack of α4-tubulin (in embryos of the kavar0/- females) leads to partial separation of the daughter centrosomes. In wild-type Drosophila embryos, the centrosomes become duplicated during telophase, leading to the production of two adjacent daughter centrosomes. The daughter centrosomes are moved apart to opposite poles along the nuclear envelope during the subsequent interphase and prophase as a result of a shift in the balance between outward and inward forces (Cytrynbaum, 2003). In the egg cortex (beyond the tenth cleavage cycle) the outward forces that separate the daughter centrosomes are generated first by the pushing force exerted by the growing microtubules, and afterwards by the cytoplasmic dynein associated with the actin microfilament network. The pushing forces are compensated by inward force generated by the C-terminal kinesin Ncd. It was reported recently that Ncd does not play a role in daughter centrosome separation in course of the first 12 cleavage divisions (Cytrynbaum, 2005). Cytrynbaum proposed in a model that at the beginning of daughter centrosome separation almost all the force that move the daughter centrosomes apart originate from the pushing force of the polymerizing tubulin (Cytrynbaum, 2003). The forming microtubules are nucleated by the daughter centrosomes. While some of the forming microtubules bump into the other centrosome they exert a pushing force and the mutual thrust leads to separation of the daughter centrosomes. In their model, Cytrynbaum assumed a radial array of microtubules emanating from the centrosomes and concluded that, the polymerization force decreases rapidly with increasing distance between the centrosomes and becomes ineffective by about 3-4 µm for two reasons (Cytrynbaum, 2003). First, the number of microtubules encountering the other centrosome drops off together with the increasing separation distance, and the receding centrosomes disappear on the nuclear horizon. Second, in the egg cortex the task of centrosome separation is taken over by cytoplasmic dynein (Scholey, 2003; Cytrynbaum, 2003; Cytrynbaum, 2005) that is linked to the actin cytoskeleton (Venkei, 2006).

While the nuclei are still deep down in the egg cytoplasm, cytoplasmic dynein associated with the cortical actin microfilament network cannot contribute to separation of the daughter centrosomes; thus the task of moving the daughter centrosomes to opposite poles seems to be left - as suggested in this study - to the interpolar microtubules. Remarkably, the interpolar microtubules that contain α4-tubulin are apt to meet the task, because they (1) bend around the nuclear envelope and (2) grow fast and sufficiently long to push the daughter centrosomes towards opposite poles, along the nuclear envelope, over a distance of more than 3-4 µm. It may be a sacrilege to propose that the early cleavage nuclei are kept large (with small curvature) such that while growing and pushing the daughter centrosomes apart the interpolar microtubules can bend along the nuclear envelope. Once the nuclei reach the egg cortex and cytoplasmic dynein joins in the task of centrosome separation, the microtubules do not need to grow for much longer and the embryos can afford to have small nuclei (Venkei, 2006).

Concerning the features of α4-tubulin, the following model is proposed for the separation of daughter centrosomes in the early cleavage embryos. Some of the forming microtubules - the interpolar microtubules - emanating from the centrosomes exert mutual pushing force on the daughter centrosomes. The pushing force is highest when the daughter centrosomes are in close vicinity and several of the growing microtubules hit the centrosomes. The interpolar microtubules push the daughter centrosomes apart while they grow along the surface of the nuclear envelope. Centrosomes stop separating once they are about 160 degree apart and the interpolar microtubules depart from the nuclear envelope. It may well be that the cytoplasmic dynein molecules, which establish contact between the nuclear envelope and the nearby microtubules, are also involved in separation of the daughter centrosomes. Involvement of cytoplasmic dynein in the maintenance of the connection between the nuclear envelope and the nearby microtubules is elegantly shown by the finding that, in embryos of Laborc17c females - with mutant cytoplasmic dynein - the centrosomes detach from the nuclear envelope (Venkei, 2006).

At the beginning of daughter centrosome separation, the centrosomes organize an asymmetric array of microtubules that are in contact with the nuclear envelope - a similar condition has recently been suggested for the astral microtubules by Cytrynbaum (Cytrynbaum, 2005). While dyneins - fixed to the nuclear envelope - move along the nearby microtubules they pull the daughter centrosomes apart. Contribution of dynein to centrosome separation ceases by the time when the centrosomes are distantly located and nucleate symmetrical arrays of microtubules (Venkei, 2006).

There seems to be no well-defined trail for the migration of centrosomes along the nuclear envelope because orientation of at least the first cleavage spindle, which is organized by the pushed apart daughter centrosomes, is random. Random orientation of the first cleavage spindle has been long known from random orientation of the Xcytoskel/tubalpha67-0, female/male borderline in gynandromorphs (Venkei, 2006). <>In embryos of the Kavar18c/+ females, E82K-α4-tubulin becomes incorporated into microtubules soon after fertilization. However, microtubules containing E82K-α4-tubulin remain short and can not push the daughter centrosomes far apart; consequently, the embryos die and the females are sterile (Venkei, 2005). Why can microtubules containing the E82K-α4-tubulin not grow long enough? The tubulin molecules form globular structures with characteristic α helices and ß sheets (Nogales, 1999). GTP is a structural component of both α- and ß-tubulin. In the evolutionary conserved α-tubulins the Glu residue at position 71 is involved (together with a number of amino acid side chains) in GTP-binding through an Mg2+ ion. Mg2+ controls stability and structure of the tubulins. Replacement of Glu71 (which is Glu82 in α4-tubulin) by Lys in E82K-α4-tubulin does not prevent the formation of heterodimers between E82K-α4-tubulin and ß-tubulin or the assembly of microtubules, as shown by incorporation of E82K-α4-tubulin into the microtubules. However, microtubules containing E82K-α4-tubulin become instable, which is probably the reason for the formation of only short microtubules in the presence of E82K-α4-tubulin. The destabilizing effect of E82K-α4-tubulin is best shown by the finding that, while at least short microtubules form in egg extract of the kavar0/- females, there is no microtubule formation in egg extracts of the Kavar18c/- females. The discrepancy between the in vivo observations (short microtubules form) and in vitro observations (microtubules do not form) can possibly be accounted for by some of the microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) that are present in vivo, and much of which were absent in the in vitro tubulin-polymerization assays. The destabilizing effect of E82K-α4-tubulin is supported by the observation that, in presence of taxol, which is known to stabilize the microtubules, short microtubules grow in the presence of E82K-α4-tubulin. Thus taxol, like some of the MAPs, can overcome to some extent the destabilizing effect of E82K-α4-tubulin (Venkei, 2006 and references therein). Surprisingly, E82K-α4-tubulin, which is very toxic to early cleavage embryos, is harmless to late cleavage embryos and does not disturb microtubule functions in the dividing cells. Explanation for the unexpected behavior of E82K-α4-tubulin is most probably related to a major difference between the early- and the late-cleavage cycles and the dividing cells. During the last cleavage divisions in the egg cortex, centrosome separation is slower than during the early divisions because there is more time - longer interphase - and less distance - smaller nuclear diameter - to travel for daughter centrosomes. The composition of contributing forces is also different; cytoplasmatic dynein anchored to the cortical actin network exerts the majority of outward forces, Ncd starts to generate an inward force that increases with the length of interpolar microtubules. The above findings suggest that the interpolar microtubules lose their importance in separating the daughter centrosomes (Venkei, 2006 and references therein).

Although the microtubules containing E82K-α4-tubulin grow shorter than those containing wild-type α4-tubulin, they are long enough to 'hand over' the daughter centrosomes to cytoplasmic dynein, which will carry on and accomplish centrosome separation. The situation is very similar in the imaginal disc and in neuroblast cells, where incorporation of E82K-α4-tubulin into the microtubules has no apparent consequences. In summary, α4-tubulin is required during early embryogenesis, when only short time intervals are available to accomplish the consecutive events including the rapid formation of long microtubules (Venkei, 2006).


GENE STRUCTURE

cDNA clone length - 1608 bp

Bases in 5' UTR - 135

Exons - 2

Bases in 3' UTR - 84

PROTEIN STRUCTURE

Amino Acids - 462

Structural Domains

The alpha-tubulin gene family in Drosophila provides a useful system in which to examine the contribution of tubulin variation to microtubule specialization during development. This family contains four encoded isotypes which display varying degrees of temporal and spatial regulation. Two of the alpha-tubulins, alphaTUB84B and alphaTUB84D, differing by only two amino acids, are expressed in most tissues throughout development and are very similar in sequence to abundant alpha-tubulins from distantly related organisms. alphaTUB85E, 5% diverged from alphaTUB84B, is the only nonmaternal alpha-tubulin in Drosophila and its accumulation is restricted to a few classes of morphologically similar but lineally unrelated cells. alphaTUB67C is the most divergent alpha-tubulin yet identified, sharing only 67% amino acid identity with alphaTUB84B (Theurkauf, 1986). Expression of alphaTUB67C is restricted to the ovary, accounting for 20% or more of the alpha-tubulin in a mature egg (Matthews, 1989). In the embryo, alphaTUB67C and alphaTUB84B/84D coassemble into all classes of microtubules present through cellular blastoderm formation (Matthews, 1993).


α-Tubulin at 67C:
Regulation | Developmental Biology | Effects of Mutation | References

date revised: 20 February 2007

Home page: The Interactive Fly © 2006 Thomas Brody, Ph.D.

The Interactive Fly resides on the
Society for Developmental Biology's Web server.