cubitus interruptus
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Protein structure Gli family zinc finger proteins are mediators of Sonic
hedgehog (Shh) signaling in vertebrates. The question
remains unanswered, however, as to how these Gli proteins
participate in the Shh signaling pathway. Regulatory activities associated with the Gli2 protein were
investigated in relation to the Shh signaling. Although Gli2
acts as a weak transcriptional activator, it is in fact a
composite of positive and negative regulatory domains. In
cultured cells, truncation of the activation domain in the C-terminal
half results in a protein with repressor activity,
while removal of the repression domain at the N terminus
converts Gli2 into a strong activator. In transgenic mouse
embryos, N-terminally truncated Gli2, unlike the full
length protein, activates a Shh target gene, HNF3beta, in the
dorsal neural tube, thus mimicking the effect of Shh signal.
This suggests that unmasking of the strong activation
potential of Gli2 through modulation of the N-terminal
repression domain is one of the key mechanisms of the Shh
signaling. A similar regulatory mechanism involving the N-terminal
region was also found for Gli3, but not for Gli1.
When the Shh signal derived from the notochord is
received by the neural plate, the widely expressed Gli2 and
Gli3 proteins are presumably converted to their active
forms in the ventral cells, leading to activation of
transcription of their target genes, including Gli1.
The
possible roles of Gli proteins in Shh-dependent gene
repression have not yet been elucidated and need to be studied
in the future (Sasaki, 1999).
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Conservation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway The three mouse Gli genes are putative transcription factors that are the homologs of cubitus
interruptus in Drosophila. Along with the gene patched, ci has been implicated in the
Hedgehog (Hh) signal transduction pathway. To assess the role of Gli in embryogenesis, its expression was compared with that of Ptc and Hh family members in mouse. Gli and Ptc are
expressed in similar domains in diverse regions of the developing mouse embryo and these regions are
adjacent to Hh signals. Gli and different Hh isoforms show reciprocal relationships in the limb, digits, brain, gut, and whisker follicles. Gli is expressed ectopically along with Ptc and Shh in
Strong's luxoid mutant mice. It is likely that Shh is expressed ectopically in the dominant Strong's Luxoid mutation. These results are consistent with conservation of the Hh signal
transduction pathway in mice with Gli potentially mediating Hh signaling in multiple regions of the
developing embryo (Platt, 1997).
Drosophila Suppressor of fused [Su(fu)] encodes a novel
468-amino-acid cytoplasmic protein that, by genetic
analysis, functions as a negative regulator of the Hedgehog
segment polarity pathway. The primary
structure, tissue distribution, biochemical and functional
analyses of a human Su(fu) [hSu(fu)] is described. Two alternatively
spliced isoforms of hSu(fu) were identified, predicting
proteins of 433 and 484 amino acids, with a calculated
molecular mass of 48 and 54 kDa, respectively. The two
proteins differ only by the inclusion or exclusion of a 52 amino-acid extension at the carboxy terminus. Both
isoforms are expressed in multiple embryonic and adult
tissues, and exhibit a developmental profile consistent
with a role in Hedgehog signaling. The hSu(fu) contains a
high-scoring PEST-domain, and exhibits an overall 37%
sequence identity (63% similarity) with the Drosophila
protein and 97% sequence identity with the mouse Su(fu).
The hSu(fu) locus maps to chromosome 10q24-q25, a
region that is deleted in glioblastomas, prostate cancer,
malignant melanoma and endometrial cancer. HSu(fu) represses activity of the zinc-finger transcription
factor Gli, which mediates Hedgehog signaling in
vertebrates, and physically interacts with Gli, Gli2 and
Gli3 as well as with supernumerary limbs (Slimb), an F-box containing protein
that, in the fly, suppresses the Hedgehog response, in part
by stimulating the degradation of the fly Gli homolog.
Coexpression of Slimb with Su(fu) potentiates the Su(fu)-mediated
repression of Gli. Taken together, these data
provide biochemical and functional evidence for the
hypothesis that Su(fu) is a key negative regulator in the
vertebrate Hedgehog signaling pathway. The data further
suggest that Su(fu) can act by binding to Gli and inhibiting
Gli-mediated transactivation as well as by serving as an
adaptor protein, which links Gli to the Slimb-dependent
proteasomal degradation pathway (Stone, 1999).
Ci/Gli zinc finger proteins mediate the transcriptional effects of Hedgehog protein signals. In Drosophila, Ci action as a transcriptional repressor or activator is
contingent upon Hedgehog-regulated, PKA-dependent proteolytic processing. Processing of Drosophila Ci155 protein depends upon activity of the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). In addition, responses to Shh signaling in vertebrates are blocked either by pharmacological manipulations that increase cAMP levels or by coexpression with the constitutively active form of the PKA catalytic subunit. These findings are consistent with a possible role for PKA phosphorylation activity in the formation of a Gli repressor. Transfected cells were treated either with forskolin (FSK), a membrane-permeable activator of adenylate cyclase, and its inactive analog dideoxy forskolin (ddFSK) as a control, or 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine (IBMX), a membrane-permeable inhibitor of cAMP phosphodiesterase. Treatment of both COS1 cells and primary limb bud cultures with FSK or IBMX but not with ddFSK or the DMSO vehicle causes the appearance of a novel species detectable by antiGli3 antiserum. This novel species has been designated Gli3-83 based upon its electrophoretic mobility. If Gli3-83 is formed by a single cleavage of the Gli3-190 precursor, as appears to occur in the processing of Ci155, this cleavage occurs between residues 700 and 740 within the Gli3-190 precursor. The Gli3-83 protein would thus contain amino-terminal sequences extending just C-terminal to the zinc finger region, corresponding to the Drosophila Ci75 repressor in its structure. The cAMP-stimulated appearance of Gli3-83 in COS1 cells and in primary limb bud cultures suggests that Gli3 processing may be dependent on PKA activity (Wang, 2000).
PKA-dependent processing of vertebrate Gli3 in the
developing limb similarly generates a potent repressor in a manner antagonized by apparent long-range signaling from posteriorly localized Sonic hedgehog
protein. The resulting anterior/posterior Gli3 repressor gradient can be perturbed by mutations of Gli3 in human genetic syndromes or by misregulation of
Gli3 processing in the chicken mutant talpid2, producing a range of limb patterning malformations. The high relative abundance and potency of Gli3 repressor
suggest specialization of Gli3 and its products for negative Hedgehog pathway regulation (Wang, 2000).
The large proportion of total Gli3 protein that exists as the Gli3-83 species suggests that Gli3-190 is readily processed. The extent, if any, of endogenous Gli1 and Gli2 processing cannot be examined until high-affinity antibodies are available. It is interesting to note, however, that neither Gli1 nor Gli2 appear to be processed in transfection experiments with established cell lines, even though Gli2 is phosphorylated upon stimulation of PKA. Gli proteins display biologically distinct properties upon high-level expression in Xenopus embryos, such that ectopic development of Shh-inducible cell fates appears to be promoted by Gli1, by Gli2 to a lesser extent, and not at all by Gli3, which actually seems to suppress the positive activities of Gli1 and Gli2. Differences in propensity to be processed may help account for these differences, with Gli3 representing a potent repressing activity for Shh-inducible fates simply because it is readily processed to form Gli3-83 repressor, particularly at sites distant from endogenous Shh activity (Wang, 2000).
The pattern of Gli-dependent transcription of a developing structure would depend upon the combined activities of all Gli protein species present. In the case of Gli3, Shh signaling appears to reduce transcription, and the protein has a high propensity for repressor formation; these properties of the Gli3 gene and of the Gli3 protein help insure that highest repressor levels are found in cells experiencing the lowest levels of Shh pathway activation. Conversely, transcription of Gli1 and Gli2 is respectively stimulated or unaffected by Shh pathway activation, at least outside the immediate zone of Shh gene expression: this neutral or positive effect is coupled to the more positive effects of Gli1 and Gli2 proteins on Gli-dependent transcription of target genes. These more positive effects of Gli1 and Gli2 proteins may be in part due to a reduced propensity for processing and repressor formation. As compared to Drosophila, the vertebrate innovation of distinctly regulated Gli genes encoding proteins with distinctly regulated propensities for processing may provide the opportunity to establish a more robust and finer gradation of Gli-dependent transcription within a developing field of cells (Wang, 2000).
In both vertebrates and Drosophila, limb development is organized by a posteriorly located source of the signaling protein Hedgehog (Hh). In Drosophila, the expression of Hh target genes is controlled by two opposing activities of the transcriptional regulator Cubitus interruptus (Ci), which activates target genes in response to Hh signaling but is converted into a repressor form in the absence of Hh. Three homologs of Ci (Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3) have been implicated in mediating responses to Sonic hedgehog (Shh) in vertebrates.
Much attention has been devoted to the expression pattern of GLI genes; GLI1 is induced by Shh, whereas GLI3 transcription appears to be repressed by Shh signaling. The regulation of GLI gene expression is therefore one important mechanism by which GLI genes organize pattern. It is not well understood, however, whether Shh signaling also controls the activities of Gli proteins post-translationally and whether these activities have activating or repressing effects on target genes in vivo. Here, the human proteins Gli1 and Gli3 have been subjected to the precise and well-defined Hh signaling assay of Drosophila wing development and it has been established that Gli1 functions as an activator and Gli3 as a repressor of Hh target genes; that the activating transcriptional activity of Gli1 and the repressing activity of Gli3 are both subject to Hh regulation in vivo; and that the combined activities of Gli1 and Gli3 can substitute for Ci in controlling Hh target gene expression during embryonic and larval development (von Mering, 1999).
One key finding of this analysis of Gli protein activities is that Drosophila Hh signaling can not only tightly control the formation of an activator form (Gli1act) but can also negatively regulate the activity of a repressor form (Gli3rep). In Drosophila, these two modes of regulation operate on the product of a single gene, ci. It has been shown that both mechanisms are essential for Hh-mediated patterning. The repressor function seems to be dispensable in early development, however, because a regulated 'activator-only' form of Ci, CiU, is sufficient to substitute for wild-type Ci during embryogenesis and early larval development. Indeed, Gli1 can also provide this function, since it rescues ci null mutant animals to late larval stages when expressed from a tubulin alpha1-GLI1 transgene. Thus, Gli1 is sufficient to mediate essential aspects of Hh signaling in embryos. During later stages of limb patterning, however, the repressor function of Ci is required to repress dpp and hh expression and neither CiU nor Gli1 can provide this function. Instead, Gli3 may have taken over the important role of providing regulated repressor activity. A prediction of this assumption is that the combination of Gli1 and Gli3 activities should be able to substitute for Ci in limb patterning. Indeed, proper regulation of Hh target gene expression is restored if ci null mutant animals are rescued by the concurrent introduction of transgenes encoding Gli1 and Gli3 (von Mering, 1999).
These findings indicate that, even without transcriptional regulation of GLI expression, the superimposition of two Gli protein activities can result in a Gli activity profile that mediates a precise Shh signaling output. The multiplication of an ancestral GLI gene might have enabled a more complex regulation of target genes and an increased flexibility in mediating the response to Hh. The fact that neither Gli1 nor Gli3 protein seems to have retained the entire complement of essential functions compared with its ancestor might have balanced the coexistence of their genes by rendering them functionally interdependent (von Mering, 1999).
The Cubitus interruptus (Ci) and Gli proteins are
transcription factors that mediate responses to Hedgehog
proteins (Hh) in flies and vertebrates, respectively. During
development of the Drosophila wing, Ci transduces the Hh
signal and regulates transcription of different target genes
at different locations. In vertebrates, the three Gli proteins
are expressed in overlapping domains and are partially
redundant. To assess how the vertebrate Glis correlate with
Drosophila Ci, each was expressed in Drosophila and their behaviors and activities were monitored. Each Gli has distinct activities that are equivalent to
portions of the regulatory arsenal of Ci. Gli2 and Gli1 have
activator functions that depend on Hh. Gli2 and Gli3 are
proteolyzed to produce a repressor form able to inhibit
hh expression. However, while Gli3 repressor activity is
regulated by Hh, Gli2 repressor activity is not. These
observations suggest that the separate activator and
repressor functions of Ci are unevenly partitioned among
the three Glis, yielding proteins with related yet distinct
properties (Aza-Blanc, 2000).
Gli1 and Gli3 proteins can transduce Hh signals in Drosophila and both proteins are regulated by Hh -- Gli1, as an inducible
activator, and Gli3 as a regulated repressor. Gli2, the Gli protein whose role and properties are least well understood, has also been characterized. Gli2 shares functional properties with Gli1 and Gli3. Gli2 contains a
repressor activity able to inhibit hh expression in vivo, as well
as an activator activity that is Hh sensitive. Recent studies have
shown that Gli1 function is dispensable in mice if both copies
of the Gli2 gene are present, suggesting that
Gli2 can compensate for the absence of Gli1 if it is present in
sufficient amounts. An explanation for this
interaction is suggested, since Gli2 can mimic Gli1 as a regulated activator.
Both Gli2 and Gli3 can be proteolyzed
in Drosophila in a manner similar to Ci. In addition, these
experiments have allowed for the detection of subtle, yet significant
differences between Gli2 and Gli3 that might explain their
distinct properties in vivo. (1) Gli2 accumulates less
proteolytic product than Gli3, and this correlates with its lower
repressor activity. This difference is thought to not be an
artifact of the Drosophila system, since transfection of Gli2
and Gli3 constructs into 10T1/2 cells generates a similar
profile of proteolysis (more Gli3 proteolytic product than Gli2).
(2) Hh affects Gli2 and Gli3 differently. No change in
the proportion of cleaved and uncleaved Gli2 is observed in
these studies, indicating that the production of Gli2 repressor is
not regulated by Hh. In contrast, Hh inhibits the accumulation
of cleaved Gli3, reversing the proportion of full-length and
processed forms. Consistent with this behavior in the fly
system, production of Gli3 repressor is also regulated in the
vertebrate limb bud, where it forms an anteroposterior gradient
in response to Sonic Hh. Further studies
on Gli2 in vertebrate systems will be required to validate these
observations (Aza-Blanc, 2000).
There are numerous examples of conserved function and
regulation between vertebrate proteins and their Drosophila
counterparts. Nevertheless, the conservation of the many
aspects of Ci function and regulation seems remarkable. Ci is
thought to interact with a number of different proteins, both as
a resident in a protein complex tethered in the cytoplasm and
as a nuclear transcription factor, and it is assumed that these
interactions are critical to the ability of Ci to regulate its activities.
Domains responsible for these presumed interactions that
provide activities for transcriptional activation and repression,
cytoplasmic and nuclear localization, DNA binding, regulated
proteolysis and association with the tethered complex, map to
multiple regions of the protein. Gli1 can
be co-immunoprecipitated with Fu and regulated by it,
providing direct evidence for its ability to associate physically
with a Drosophila partner. Since all three Gli proteins appear
to function in a regulated manner in Drosophila, it is presumed
that they retain many or most functional contacts, and it must
be that the many regions responsible for these contacts are
conserved. However, it seems likely that differences imposed
by their particular structure delimit how they interact with other
components of the pathway, since each of them retains some
but not all aspects of Hh regulation (Aza-Blanc, 2000).
Although in aggregate the Gli proteins appear to embody the
many different attributes of Ci, only some of the Ci activities
are in each. Most intriguing, perhaps, is the differential
activation of ptc and dpp expression by Gli1 and Gli2,
respectively. The basis for the selectivity of Gli1 for ptc and
Gli2 for dpp is not understood, but it has many conceivable
causes. One is that Gli2 interacts with proteins known to
associate with Ci, such as CBP, but that
Gli1 does not. Alternatively, the ability of Gli2 to activate dpp
more strongly could be related to the conversion of Gli2 to a
repressor form. It is formally possible that the activator and
repressor forms can cooperate in some manner to enhance dpp
transcription, or that the repressor form competes with the
activator for binding sites at the ptc promoter. Consistent with
this latter proposal, the level of ptc induction
in wing discs is inversely related to the level of Gli2
expression: higher levels of expression produce lower levels
of ptc. Since Ci75 is abundant in A cells that express high
levels of dpp, but it is not in cells closer to the compartment
border where ptc is expressed, this model may be relevant to
Ci. Perhaps the most interesting possibility to consider is that
the reason for the differential activation of dpp and ptc may be
that Gli1 and Gli2 represent different forms of Ci Act, one with
a preference for ptc and the other for dpp (Aza-Blanc, 2000).
The finding that the individual Gli proteins contain a subset
of the activities retained by Ci suggests that evolution has
dispersed these functions in the course of gene duplication and
diversification. It also suggests that proteins like Ci can be
considered to represent composites whose multiple functions
are compressed into a single polypeptide. If Ci is only one
example of many such proteins, then such composite proteins
might contribute significantly to the complexity of functions
encoded by the Drosophila genome. The Drosophila genome
is thought to be especially compact, with fewer genes even than
C. elegans. It has been assumed that
splicing variants and alternative promoters account for
additional complexity. The Ci paradigm suggests that
composite proteins may contribute as well (Aza-Blanc, 2000).
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Interaction with DNA GLI3 represents an important control gene for development and differentiation of several body structures.
Reduction in gene dosage already leads to severe perturbation, especially of limb morphogenesis. The gene
encodes a zinc finger protein that likely functions as a transcriptional modulator. The five zinc fingers
should be capable of recognizing an extended stretch of genomic DNA. The sequence bound by the GLI3 zinc
fingers consists of 16 nucleotides and shows a high degree of similarity to sequences bound by the GLI and tra-1
proteins. Comparison with protein-DNA interactions in the known crystal structure of the GLI-DNA complex
suggests relevant interactions of additional amino acids of GLI3 with its target site (Vortkamp, 1995).
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Protein Interactions The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is crucial for pattern formation during metazoan development. Although originially characterized in Drosophila, vertebrate
homologs have been identified for several, but not all, genes in the pathway. Analysis of mutants in Drosophila demonstrates that Suppressor of fused [Su(fu)]
interacts genetically with genes encoding proteins in the Hh signal transduction pathway, and its protein product physically interacts with two of the proteins in the Hh
pathway. The molecular cloning and characterization of chicken and mouse homologs of Su(fu) is reported here. The chick and mouse proteins are 27% identical and
53% similar at the amino acid level to the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis proteins. Vertebrate Su(fu) is widely expressed in the developing embryo
with higher levels in tissues that are known to be patterned by Hh signaling. The chick Su(fu) protein can physically interact with factors known to function in Hh
signal transduction including the Drosophila serine/threonine kinase, Fused, and the vertebrate transcriptional regulators Gli1 and Gli3. This interaction may be
significant for transcriptional regulation, as recombinant Su(fu) enhances the ability of Gli proteins to bind DNA in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Pearse, 1999).
The human Suppressor-of-Fused (SUFUH) complementary DNA has been identified and
the gene product has been shown to interact physically with the transcriptional effector GLI-1. SUFUH can sequester GLI-1 in the cytoplasm, but can also interact with GLI-1 on DNA. Functionally, SUFUH inhibits transcriptional activation by
GLI-1, as well as osteogenic differentiation in response to
signaling from Sonic hedgehog. Localization of GLI-1 is
influenced by the presence of a GLI-1 nuclear-export signal, and
GLI-1 becomes constitutively nuclear when this signal is
mutated or nuclear export is inhibited. These results show
that SUFUH is a conserved negative regulator of GLI-1
signaling that may affect nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of
GLI-1 or the activity of GLI-1 in the nucleus and thereby
modulate cellular responses (Kogerman, 1999).
To test whether vertebrate Sufu is expressed in a pattern consistent
with a potential role in mediating Shh signaling during embryogenesis, whole-mount in situ hybridization was used to analyse Sufu expression in
mouse embryos at days 8.5 to 15.5 of development. Throughout the
entire period signals were observed in the neural tube and, at the later stages,
in the neural tube derivatives -- the brain and spinal cord. The somites
express Sufu at all stages; the vibrissae field stain positively for Sufu
from day 12.5 and onwards, with the vibrissae themselves being spared.
The Sufu expression pattern during limb-bud development appears to be
separated into two distinct phases, with strong homogeneous staining all
over the limb buds being observed from their emergence at 9.5 days,
whereas at 12.5 days only the interdigital mesenchyme of the limbs
stain positively. This expression pattern partially overlaps with
the expression of Ptch and the Ci homologs Gli 1-3, and is compatible
with a conserved role for Sufu in Shh signaling (Kogerman, 1999).
To substantiate this observation in more detail and in the human
system, the expression of SUFUH and PTCH1 was analyzed in the
developing limb of a 12-week-old human embryo by radioactive in situ
hybridization. The results show marked SUFUH expression in
the osteoblasts of the perichondrium, where PTCH1 is also highly
expressed. These findings are consistent with earlier observations in the
avian and murine systems, in which Ptch1 and Gli1 are highly expressed in
the same type of cells in response to Ihh secretion by prehypertrophic
chondrocytes. Taken together, these results show that SUFUH is
preferentially expressed in cells that receive a Hedgehog signal, and
indicate that, during embryogenesis, SUFUH may be co-regulated with
PTCH1 and GLI1 (Kogerman, 1999).
The retention of GLI-1 in the cytoplasm by SUFUH when nuclear
export is compromised, and the similar SUFUH-mediated retention in the
cytoplasm of an otherwise constitutively nuclear GLI-1 variant (truncated so that it lacks the NES) indicates that SUFUH could block nuclear entry of
GLI-1, possibly by masking a nuclear-localization signal, and thereby
inhibit transcriptional activation of target genes. Consistent with this
idea, a truncated SUFUH variant unable to repress GLI1-induced
transcriptional activation is also unable to modify the subcellular localization
of GLI-1. What remains an interesting question for future studies is whether or not binding of SUFUH to GLI-1 on DNA, or
elsewhere in the nuclear compartment, actually acts to repress or block
activation of transcription, alone or in combination with cytoplasmic
retention of GLI-1. The
expression of Sufu in cells next to Shh- or Ihh-producing cells during
mouse and human embryogenesis, coupled with the ability of Sufu to inhibit
Gli-mediated transcriptional activation, indicates that an important function
of Sufu may be to act in an intracellular negative feedback mechanism and
to impose thresholds on the responsiveness of cells to Shh and Ihh. A
similar role for D-Axin has been proposed as regards Wingless signaling in
Drosophila (Kogerman, 1999).
Hedgehog (Hh) proteins are secreted factors that control cell proliferation and cell-fate specification. Hh signaling is mediated in vertebrates by the Gli zinc-finger transcription factors (Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3) and in Drosophila by the Gli homolog Cubitus interruptus (Ci). However, the mechanisms that regulate Gli/Ci activity are not fully understood. Genetic studies in Drosophila have identified a putative serine-threonine kinase, Fused (Fu), and a new protein, Suppressor of Fused [Su(fu)], as modulators of Ci activity. A human homologue of Drosophila Fu, hFu, regulates the activity of Gli1 and Gli2 on several levels. hFu converts Gli2 from a weak to a strong transcriptional activator, antagonizes the repressive effect of the human Su(fu) homolog, [hSu(fu)], on Gli1 and Gli2, and promotes nuclear localization of Gli1 and Gli2 (Murone, 2000).
To identify possible regulators of Gli proteins, complementary DNAs were isolated encoding hFu, which shares a significant level of homology with Drosophila Fu in the kinase domain (55%), but only a limited amount of homology over the remaining 1,052 amino acids. The gene encoding hFu was mapped to chromosome 2q35, close to the PAX3 gene, which is implicated in the Klein-Waardenburg syndrome. PAX3 is a target of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and it has been suggested that additional loci in the 2q35 region may regulate the PAX3 locus, thereby influencing the Klein-Waardenburg phenotype. Northern-blot analysis has showen that a single 5-kb hFu transcript is expressed at low levels in most fetal tissues and adult ovaries, and at high levels in adult testes, where it is localized in germ cells with other components of the Hh pathway. Examination of a mouse embryo at day 13.5 of development by in situ hybridization shows that mouse Fu (mFu) mRNA is widely distributed in Shh-responsive tissues, including the forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, spinal cord, somites, developing limb buds and skin (Murone, 2000).
To determine whether hFu can regulate Gli activity, hFu was cotransfected with a Gli-binding-site (Gli-BS) luciferase reporter in the Hh-responsive cell line C3H10T1/2. hFu alone is capable of weakly inducing transcription of the Gli-BS reporter, indicating that it may be a positive regulator of the Hh pathway. Although hFu contains a putative kinase domain, no substantial kinase activity for hFu was detected; a similar lack of kinase activity has been reported for Drosophila Fused (Murone, 2000).
To determine the function of the kinase domain of hFu, a putative catalytically dead version of hFu [hFu(K33R)] was constructed by mutating a conserved lysine residue in the ATP-binding site at position 33. This residue is crucial to the catalytic activity of all kinases, and the corresponding mutation in Drosophila leads to a fu phenotype. hFu(K33R) is able to activate the Gli-BS reporter as efficiently as wild-type hFu, indicating that the putative kinase activity of hFu may not contribute significantly to Gli activation under these conditions. A similar result has been obtained for a hFu construct [hFu(270-1,315)] lacking the entire kinase domain (amino acids 1-269). The activity of hFu was tested in combination with various Gli-family members. Whereas human Gli1 alone strongly induces the luciferase reporter, mouse Gli2 exhibits only weak activity and human Gli3 shows no activity at all. hFu does not affect the activity of Gli1 and Gli3, but strongly synergizes with Gli2. Moreover, activation of Gli2 by hFu is antagonized by hSu(fu). In contrast, Gli1 is constitutively active and its ability to activate the Gli-BS reporter is inhibited by hSu(fu) and restored in the presence of hFu (Murone, 2000).
To investigate further the mechanisms by which hFu regulates Gli activity, whether hFu forms a physical complex with hSu(fu) or the various Gli proteins was determined. Cultured cells were cotransfected with epitope-tagged versions of hFu, hSu(fu), Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3 and the resulting interactions were observed. hFu co-immunoprecipitates with hSu(fu) and with Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3. In vertebrates, Su(fu) represses Gli1 function in part by tethering it in the cytoplasm. In contrast, hFu and hFu(K 33R) promote nuclear localization of Gli1. An assessment was made of whether hFu could influence the subcellular localization of Gli1 when co-expressed with hSu(fu). In the presence of hSu(fu), roughly 3% of cells exhibit nuclear staining of Gli1. In contrast, when both hSu(fu) and hFu are present, 20% of cells possess nuclear Gli1. Identical results are obtained for Gli2. Overall, these results indicate that hFu controls the activity of Gli1 and Gli2 by opposing the effect of hSu(fu). Whereas hSu(fu) constrains Gli1 and Gli2 in the cytoplasm, hFu promotes their nuclear localization. Gli2 also requires an additional function of hFu to become transcriptionally active, as Gli2 transfected in the absence of hSu(fu) is unable to activate transcription unless hFu is present, despite the fact that it enters the nucleus. The mechanisms by which hFu activates Gli2 remain to be elucidated but may include a hFu-mediated modification of Gli2 to mask the inhibitory Gli2 amino-terminal domain (Murone, 2000).
The activity of hFu described here does not seem to require a functional kinase domain, since overexpression of kinase-mutant forms of Fu are as active as wild-type forms. Catalytically dead versions of other serine-threonine kinases, such as the RIPs8 and IRAKs14, show comparable activity to their wild-type counterparts in inducing apoptosis or activating NFkappaB respectively. Although some Drosophila kinase-domain fu mutants suffer a complete lack of induction of Hh target genes in the embryo, they show only a partial fu phenotype in the wing discs, indicating that there may be different requirements for the kinase activity of Fu in different cellular contexts (Murone, 2000).
The Suppressor of fused [Su(fu)] gene of Drosophila
encodes a protein containing a
PEST sequence [a sequence enriched in proline (P),
glutamic acid (E), serine (S) and threonine (T)] that
acts as an antagonist to the serine-threonine kinase Fused
in Hedgehog (Hh) signal transduction during embryogenesis.
The Su(fu) gene isolated from a distantly related
Drosophila species, D. virilis, shows significantly high
homology throughout its protein sequence with its D. melanogaster counterpart. These two Drosophila homologs of Su(fu) are functionally interchangeable
in enhancing the fused phenotype. Mammalian homologs of Su(fu) have been isolated. The absence of the
PEST sequence in the mammalian Su(fu) protein suggests
a different regulation for this product between fly
and vertebrates. Using the yeast two-hybrid method, the murine Su(fu) protein is shown to interact directly
with the Fused and Cubitus interruptus proteins, known
partners of Su(fu) in Drosophila. Su(fu) could be regulated posttranslationally in the fly
and at another level in vertebrates. A similar divergence is
observed for the regulation of the ci gene and its homologs,
the Gli genes: in Drosophila, there is only one ci
gene whose product is regulated posttranslationally; in vertebrates, there are three ci-related
genes Gli, Gli2 and Gli3 that are regulated at a transcriptional
level (Delattre, 1999).
The Suppressor of Fused [Su(fu)] protein plays a conserved role in the regulation of Gli transcription factors of the hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway that controls cell fate and tissue patterning during development. In both Drosophila and mammals, Su(fu) represses Gli-mediated transcription, but the mode of its action is not completely understood. Recent evidence suggests that Su(fu) physically interacts with the Gli proteins and, when overexpressed, sequesters Gli in the cytoplasm. However, Su(fu) also traverses into the nucleus under the influence of a serine-threonine kinase, Fused (Fu), and has the ability to form a DNA-binding complex with Gli, suggesting that it has a nuclear function. This study reports that the mouse homolog of Su(fu) [mSu(fu)] specifically interacts with SAP18, a component of the mSin3 and histone deacetylase complex. In addition, mSu(fu) functionally cooperates with SAP18 to repress transcription by recruiting the SAP18-mSin3 complex to promoters containing the Gli-binding element. These results provide biochemical evidence that Su(fu) directly participates in modulating the transcriptional activity of Gli (Cheng, 2002).
Sonic hedgehog signaling plays a critical role during development and carcinogenesis. While Gli family members govern the transcriptional output of Shh signaling, little is known how Gli-mediated transcriptional activity is regulated. The actin-binding protein Missing in Metastasis (MIM) has been identified as a new Shh-responsive gene. MIM is a member of the Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome family of proteins and contains a conserved coiled-coil protein interaction domain and a C-terminal WH2 domain. Previous independent studies have shown that MIM binds monomeric actin through its WH2 domain and bundles F-actin using its N-terminal coiled-coil domain.
Together, Gli1 and MIM recapitulate Shh-mediated epidermal proliferation and invasion in regenerated human skin. MIM is part of a Gli/Suppressor of Fused complex and potentiates Gli-dependent transcription using domains distinct from those used for monomeric actin binding. These data define MIM as both a Shh-responsive gene and a new member of the pathway that modulates Gli responses during growth and tumorigenesis (Callahan, 2004).
Hedgehog-regulated processing of the transcription factor Cubitus interruptus (Ci) in Drosophila depends on phosphorylation of the C-terminal region of Ci by cAMP-dependent protein kinase and subsequently by Casein kinase 1 and Glycogen synthase kinase 3. Ci processing also requires Slimb, an F-box protein of SCF (Skp1/Cullin/F-box proteins) complex, and the proteasome, but the interplay between phosphorylation and the activity of Slimb and the proteasome remains unclear. This study shows that processing of the Gli3 protein, a homolog of Ci, also depends on phosphorylation of a set of four cAMP-dependent protein kinase sites that primes subsequent phosphorylation of adjacent casein kinase 1 and glycogen synthase kinase 3. Gain- and loss-of-function analyses in cultured cells further reveal that ßTrCP, the vertebrate homolog of Slimb, is required for Gli3 processing, and ßTrCP can bind phosphorylated Gli3 both in vitro and in vivo. Gli3 protein is polyubiquitinated in the cell, and its processing depends on proteasome activity. These findings provide evidence for a direct link between phosphorylation of Gli3/Ci proteins and ßTrCP/Slimb action, thus supporting the hypothesis that the processing of Gli3/Ci is affected by the proteasome (Wang, 2006).
The Hedgehog (Hh) and Wingless (Wnt) families of secreted signaling molecules have key roles in embryonic development and adult tissue homeostasis. In the developing neural tube, Wnt and Shh, emanating from dorsal and ventral regions, respectively, have been proposed to govern the proliferation and survival of neural progenitors. Surprisingly, Shh is required for the growth and survival of cells in both ventral and dorsal neural tube. This study demonstrates that inhibition of Shh signaling causes a reduction in Wnt-mediated transcriptional activation. This reduction requires Gli3. Assays in embryos and cell lines indicate that repressor forms of the Hh-regulated transcription factor, Gli3 (Gli3R), which are generated in the absence of Hh signaling, inhibit canonical Wnt signaling. Gli3R acts by antagonizing active forms of the Wnt transcriptional effector, β-catenin. Consistent with this, Gli3R appears to physically interact with the carboxy-terminal domain of β-catenin, a region that includes the transactivation domain. These data offer an explanation for the proliferative defects in Shh null embryos and suggest a novel mechanism for crosstalk between the Hh and Wnt pathways (Ulloa, 2007).
Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signals are transduced into nuclear ratios of Gli transcriptional activator versus repressor. The initial part of this process is accomplished by Shh acting through Patched (Ptc) to regulate Smoothened (Smo) activity. The mechanisms by which Ptc regulates Smo, and Smo activity is transduced to processing of Gli proteins remain unclear. Recently, a forward genetic approach in mice identified a role for intraflagellar transport (IFT) genes in Shh signal transduction, downstream of Patched (Ptc) and Rab23. This study shows that the retrograde motor for IFT is required in the mouse for the phenotypic expression of both Gli activator and repressor function and for effective proteolytic processing of Gli3. Furthermore, the localization of Smo to primary cilia is disrupted in mutants. These data indicate that primary cilia act as specialized signal transduction organelles required for coupling Smo activity to the biochemical processing of Gli3 protein (May, 2005).
Several studies have linked cilia and Hedgehog signaling, but the precise roles of ciliary proteins in signal transduction remain enigmatic. A mouse mutation, hennin (hnn), causes coupled defects in cilia structure and Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. The hnn mutant cilia are short with a specific defect in the structure of the ciliary axoneme, and the hnn neural tube shows a Shh-independent expansion of the domain of motor neuron progenitors. The hnn mutation is a null allele of Arl13b, a small GTPase of the Arf/Arl family, and the Arl13b protein is localized to cilia. Double mutant analysis indicates that Gli3 repressor activity is normal in hnn embryos, but Gli activators are constitutively active at low levels. Thus, normal structure of the ciliary axoneme is required for the cell to translate different levels of Shh ligand into differential regulation of the Gli transcription factors that implement Hedgehog signals (Caspary, 2007).
In mutants that lack cilia altogether, such as Ift172 and Ift88 mutants, no Gli activator is produced. In contrast, in hnn mutants, it appears there is a constitutive low level of Gli activator in all cells in the neural tube. It is therefore proposed that there are two cilia-dependent steps in the formation of Gli activators. It is proposed that full-length Gli proteins are modified within the cilium in a Hh-independent process to have a low level of activator function, and the low-level activator is normally tethered in the cilium in the absence of ligand. The idea that there are ligand-independent steps in Hh signaling that depend on cilia is not novel: processing of Gli3 to make Gli3 repressor is also cilia dependent and occurs in the absence of ligand. In response to Hh, full-length Gli proteins can be further modified to create high-level activator, which is then released from the cilium to the nucleus. In the abnormal cilia that lack Arl13b, the modification that produces full-length Gli protein with low-level activity takes place, but this low-level activator is not effectively tethered in the cilium and is released inappropriately to the nucleus in the absence of Hh ligand. This step retains a small amount of sensitivity to upstream signals in hnn mutant, as the phenotype of Ptch1 hnn double mutants is not identical to the hnn phenotype (Caspary, 2007).
Two alternative views of the relationship between cilia and Hh signaling have been proposed. In the simpler view, cilia represent a site where Hh pathway components are enriched, and the high local concentration of the proteins allows efficient signaling transduction. Alternatively, dynamic trafficking within the cilium may allow a sequence of protein interactions that promote the activity of the pathway. The hnn phenotype supports the latter model, as it reveals a complexity of events that occur within the cilium (Caspary, 2007).
The hedgehog (Hh) pathway plays a critical role during embryo development and in cancer. Although the molecular basis by which protein kinase A (PKA) regulates the stability of Hedgehog's downstream transcription factor Cubitus interruptus (the Drosophila homologue of vertebrate Gli molecules) is well documented, the mechanism by which PKA inhibits the functions of Gli molecules in vertebrates remains elusive. This study reports that activation of PKA retains Gli1 in the cytoplasm. Conversely, inhibition of PKA activity promotes nuclear accumulation of Gli1. Mutation analysis identifies Thr374 as a major PKA site determining Gli1 protein localization. In the three-dimensional structure, Thr374 resides adjacent to the basic residue cluster of the nuclear localization signal (NLS). Phosphorylation of this Thr residue is predicted to alter the local charge and consequently the NLS function. Indeed, mutation of this residue to Asp (Gli1/T374D) results in more cytoplasmic Gli1 whereas a mutation to Lys (Gli1/T374K) leads to more nuclear Gli1. Disruption of the NLS causes Gli1/T374K to be more cytoplasmic. The change of Gli1 localization is correlated with the change of its transcriptional activity. These data provide evidence to support a model that PKA regulates Gli1 localization and its transcriptional activity, in part, through modulating the NLS function (Sheng, 2006).
Sonic hedgehog (SHH) is a secreted morphogen that regulates the patterning and growth of many tissues in the developing mouse embryo, including the central nervous system (CNS). A member of the FK506-binding protein family, FKBP8, is an essential antagonist of SHH signaling in CNS development. Loss of FKBP8 causes ectopic and ligand-independent activation of the Shh pathway, leading to expansion of ventral cell fates in the posterior neural tube and suppression of eye development. Although it is expressed broadly, FKBP8 is required to antagonize SHH signaling primarily in neural tissues, suggesting that hedgehog signal transduction is subject to cell-type specific modulation during mammalian development.
FKBP8 shares sequence similarity with an uncharacterized Drosophila gene product, CG5482. The predicted CG5482 protein has the same overall domain structure, as well as a membrane insertion site at the extreme C terminus. There are no known mutations in the CG5482 gene, nor are there mutations in other Drosophila FKBP genes that suggest their involvement in hedgehog signaling (Bulgakov, 2004).
It is not yet understood how FKBP8 acts in the hedgehog pathway at the molecular level. Some endogenous FKBP8 protein is present in a complex with the RII subunit of protein kinase A in vivo, raising the possibility that FKBP8 has a role in PKA-dependent phosphorylation of the GLI proteins. This possibility is supported by the similarity in phenotype between mutants deficient in FKBP8 and PKA. Total PKA activity in Fkbp8 mutant embryos, measured in vitro, is not diminished, suggesting that FKBP8 is not required for general PKA activity. FKBP8 has been found to associate with and inhibits the phosphatase calcineurin. This raises the possibility that activated calcineurin can promote hedgehog signaling.
Regardless of the biochemical functions of FKBP8 in hedgehog signaling, it seems likely that its activities ultimately converge on the GLI transcription factors. Given that Gli2-null mutants have a considerably more severe neural patterning phenotype than Gli3 or Gli1 null mutants, GLI2 might be the principal target of FKBP8 function. This hypothesis is currently being tested though genetic epistasis (Bulgakov, 2004).
Zic family genes encode zinc finger proteins, which play important roles in vertebrate development. The zinc finger domains are highly conserved between Zic proteins and show a notable homology to those of Gli family proteins. In this study, the functional properties of Zic proteins and their relationship to the GLI proteins has been investigated. An optimal binding sequence for Zic1, Zic2, and Zic3 proteins was establised by electrophoretic mobility shift assay-based target selection and mutational analysis. The selected sequence is almost identical to the GLI binding sequence. However, the binding affinity is lower than that of GLI. Consistent results were obtained in reporter assays, in which transcriptional activation by Zic proteins is less dependent on the GLI binding sequence than GLI1. Moreover, Zic proteins activate a wide range of promoters irrespective of the presence of a GLI binding sequence. When Zic and GLI proteins are cotransfected into cultured cells, Zic proteins enhance or suppress sequence-dependent, GLI-mediated transactivation depending on cell type. Taken together, these results suggest that Zic proteins may act as transcriptional coactivators and that their function may be modulated by the GLI proteins and possibly by other cell type-specific cofactors (Mizugishi, 2001).
In the present study, a consensus binding sequence for Zics was established by EMSA-based target selection and mutational analysis. The Zic binding sequence is essentially identical to the GLI-BS, 5'-TGGGTGGTC -3', and has a minimum consensus sequence of 5'-GGGTGGTC-3'. The binding affinities for this sequence are very similar among the three Zic proteins examined. However, the Zics-ZF bind the GLI-BS much more weakly than GLI3-ZF, as shown by competition experiments and the calculated binding constant. The Kd values of Zics are much higher than those of other transcription factors that function in a sequence-specific manner. Therefore, it is unlikely that Zic proteins compete with GLI for the GLI-BS (Mizugishi, 2001).
The binding properties are consistent with the results of the reporter assay, in which the dependence of Zic proteins on the GLI-BS for transcriptional activation is much less than that of GLI1. Instead, Zics activated transcription even in the absence of the GLI-BS via various promoters (TK promoter, adenovirus major late promoter, SV40 early promoter, and Zic1 promoter). On the basis of these facts, rather than being the transcription factors that regulate transcription by direct binding to DNA, Zic family proteins may function as transcriptional coactivators, which potentiate the activity of other transcription regulatory factors. It is possible that Zics interact with the transcription machinery or other factors that regulate transcriptional efficiency (Mizugishi, 2001).
The relationship between Zic and GLI proteins was examined. In C3H10T1/2 cells, Zic-GLI1 or Zic-GLI3 coactivates reporter gene expression, whereas in 293T cells, coexistence of the Zic and GLI proteins has a reverse effect. These results suggest a significant regulatory relationship between Zic and GLI proteins; however, the nature of this interaction remains unclear (Mizugishi, 2001).
The interaction between Zic and GLI proteins may be entirely independent of DNA binding. This direct or indirect interaction between Zic and GLI proteins may be modulated by cell type-specific cofactors. One well characterized cell type-specific cofactor is Oct-binding factor 1 (OBF-1); this is expressed in B-lymphocyte lineages and interacts with the POU-homeodomain proteins Oct-1 and Oct-2 to enhance transcriptional activation in the B-cell lineage. Similar cell type-specific cofactors might modify the GLI-Zic interactions. It is also possible that GLI proteins may be differentially modified post-translationally depending on the presence of Zics in different cell types. Recently, it was shown that Gli3 was processed depending on cAMP-activated protein kinase to generate a phosphorylated repressor form. Zic proteins might be involved in this pathway (Mizugishi, 2001).
Alternatively, the differential binding affinities of the Zic and GLI proteins for the target sequence may underlie the regulatory relationship between these two protein families. Although Zics-ZF have much lower binding affinities to the GLI-BS, there is a DNA binding transcription factor that has a Kd value similar to those of Zics. Moreover, the different human homeodomain proteins, despite having similar homeodomains, bind their target sequence with different affinities and thereby generate a complex regulatory network in the developmental process. In that case, less conserved domains other than the zinc finger may modulate binding in vivo to determine final binding specificity, because the recombinant proteins used in these experiments only included zinc finger domains. It is necessary to examine the downstream target genes in the developmental context to understand the Zic-DNA interaction in detail (Mizugishi, 2001).
Zic1/Gli3 double mutant mice showed severe abnormalities of vertebral arches not found in single mutants, strongly suggesting that these two proteins act synergistically in the development of the vertebral arches. However, in Xenopus laevis it was shown that Zic2 antagonizes the Gli proteins in the patterning of the neural plate. These findings suggest that Zic and GLI proteins may interact to variously repress or activate gene expression in vivo (Mizugishi, 2001).
In conclusion, Zic1, Zic2, and Zic3-ZF specifically recognize and bind the GLI-BS but with a much lower binding affinity than that of the GLI3-ZF. Zic proteins activated a wide range of promoters. These results suggest that Zic proteins may function as transcriptional coactivators or as factors generally involved in the gene expression process. How can such general factors regulate specific developmental processes, including the patterning of forebrain, cerebellum, axial skeleton, vasculature, and visceral organs? A clue to solving this problem may be the relationship with Gli family proteins as shown in this study. To clarify the regulatory networks under a broad range of developmental processes, the relationships between Zic proteins and other molecules in the hedgehog signaling pathway and transforming growth factor beta superfamily, which are closely related to each other, should also be examined in both in vitro and in vivo studies (Mizugishi, 2001).
Zic and Gli family proteins are transcription factors that share similar zinc finger domains. Recent studies indicate that Zic and Gli collaborate in neural and skeletal development. Evidence suggests that the Zic and Gli proteins physically and functionally interact through their zinc finger domains. Moreover, Gli proteins were translocated to cell nuclei by coexpressed Zic proteins, and both proteins regulated each other's transcriptional activity. These result suggests that the physical interaction between Zic and Gli is the molecular basis of their antagonistic or synergistic features in developmental contexts and that Zic proteins are potential modulators of the hedgehog-mediated signaling pathway (Koyabu, 2001).
In C. elegans, the Gli-family transcription factor TRA-1 is the terminal effector of the sex-determination pathway. TRA-1 activity inhibits male development and allows female fates. Genetic studies have indicated that TRA-1 is negatively regulated by the fem-1, fem-2, and fem-3 genes. However, the mechanism of this regulation has not been understood. This study shows that TRA-1 is regulated by degradation mediated by a CUL-2-based ubiquitin ligase complex that contains FEM-1 as the substrate-recognition subunit, and FEM-2 and FEM-3 as cofactors. CUL-2 physically associates with both FEM-1 and TRA-1 in vivo, and cul-2 mutant males share feminization phenotypes with fem mutants. CUL-2 and the FEM proteins negatively regulate TRA-1 protein levels in C. elegans. When expressed in human cells, the FEM proteins interact with human CUL2 and induce the proteasome-dependent degradation of TRA-1. This work demonstrates that the terminal step in C. elegans sex determination is controlled by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (Starostina, 2007).
Cubitus interruptus and butterfly eyespot evolution The origin of new morphological characters is a long-standing problem in evolutionary biology. Novelties
arise through changes in development, but the nature of these changes is largely unknown. In butterflies,
eyespots have evolved as new pattern elements that develop from special organizers called foci. Formation
of these foci is associated with novel expression patterns of the Hedgehog signaling protein, its receptor
Patched, the transcription factor Cubitus interruptus, and the engrailed target gene, all of which break the conserved
compartmental restrictions on this regulatory circuit in insect wings. Redeployment of preexisting
regulatory circuits may be a general mechanism underlying the evolution of novelties. hh is expressed in all cells of the posterior compartment of the butterfly wing disc, as it is in Drosophila, but hh transcript levels are increased in a striking pattern in cells just outside of the subdivision midlines at specific positions along the proximodistal axis of the wing. These domains of increased hh transcription flank cells that have the potential to form foci. Higher levels of hh transcripts accumulate specifically in cells that flank the developing foci. In the presence of high levels of Hh, Patched function is inhibited, resulting in the accumulation of the activator form of Ci. Because ptc is a direct target of Ci, cells that receive and transduce the Hh signal have increased levels of ptc transcription. Activation of ptc transcription, accompanied by the accumulation of Ci protein occurs in cells that are flanked by the domains of highest hh transcription and are destined to become eyespot foci. these results indicate that the Hh signal is received and transduced by cells that will differentiate as foci. These expression patterns break the A/P compartmental restrictions on gene expression known in Drosophila. During the course of eyespot evolution, there is a relaxation of the strict En-mediated repression of ci that occurs in the posterior compartment of Drosophila. During focal establishment, en and invected are targets, rather than inducers of Hh signaling. In most species of butterflies, eyespots are found only in the posterior compartment of the wing. But in those species in which eyespots are found in the anterior compartment, both En/Inv and Ci are coexpressed in eyespot foci, including the one in the anterior compartment. Thus the expression of the Hh signaling pathway and en/inv is associated with the development of all eyespot foci and has become independent of A/P compartmental restrictions. It is suggested that during eyespot evolution, the Hh-dependent regulatory circuit that establishes foci is recruited from the circuit that acts along the A/P boundary of the wing. This recruitment of an entire regulatory circuit through changes in the regulation of a subset of components increases the facility with which new developmental functions can evolve and may be a general theme in the evolution of novelties within extant structures (Keys, 1999).
Cubitus interruptus homologs in fish
Zebrafish you-too (yot) mutations interfere with Hedgehog (Hh) signaling during embryogenesis. Using a
comparative synteny approach, yot was isolated as a zinc finger transcription factor homologous to the Hh
target gli2. Two alleles of yot contain nonsense mutations resulting in carboxy-terminally truncated
proteins. In addition to causing defects in midline development, muscle differentiation, and retinal axon
guidance. yot mutations disrupt anterior pituitary and ventral forebrain differentiation. yot mutations also
cause ectopic lens formation in the ventral diencephalon. These findings reveal that truncated zebrafish Gli2
proteins interfere with Hh signaling necessary for differentiation and axon guidance in the ventral
forebrain (Karlstrom, 1999).
The specification of different muscle cell types in the zebrafish embryo requires signals that emanate from the axial
mesoderm. Overexpression of different members of the Hedgehog protein
family can induce the differentiation of two types of slow-twitch muscles: the superficially located slow-twitch fibers and the medially located muscle pioneer (MP) cells. The requirement for Hedgehog signaling in the specification of these distinct muscle cell types has been investigated in two ways: (1) by characterizing the effects on target gene expression and muscle cell differentiation of the u-type (you; you-too; sonic you; chameleon; u-boot). mutants, members of a phenotypic group previously implicated in Hedgehog signaling, and (2) by analyzing the effects of overexpression of the Patched1 protein, a negative regulator of Hedgehog
signaling. Embryos mutant for u-type genes all have normal notochords,
leading to the suggestion that they may directly disrupt the
signaling pathway required for MP induction. Two members of
this class map to genes encoding components of the Hh signaling pathway. The
syu mutations map to the shh gene itself, while mutations in the gene encoding the transcription factor Gli2, a homolog of the Drosophila Ci protein, are responsible for the yot mutant phenotype. The results support the idea that most u-type genes are required for Hedgehog signaling. The analysis of ptc1 expression has confirmed a role for
two other members of the u-type class, con and you, in the
propagation or transduction of the Hh signals between the
notochord and the paraxial mesoderm. It is striking that the
effects of both these mutants are like those of syu, initially
weak and increasing in severity with developmental time. Whether this reflects a hypomorphism of the you and con alleles or a specificity in the function of the you and con gene products remains to be elucidated. While hedgehog signaling is essential for slow myocyte differentiation, the loss of activity of one signal, Sonic hedgehog, can be partially compensated for by other Hedgehog family proteins (Lewis, 1999b).
Gli proteins regulate the transcription of Hedgehog (Hh) target genes.
Genetic studies in mouse have shown that Gli1 is not essential for
embryogenesis, whereas Gli2 acts as an activator of Hh target genes. In
contrast, misexpression studies in Xenopus and cultured cells have
suggested that Gli1 can act as an activator of Hh-regulated genes, whereas Gli2 might function as a repressor of a subset of Hh targets. To clarify the roles of gli genes during vertebrate development,
the requirements were analyzed for gli1 and gli2 during zebrafish embryogenesis. detour (dtr) mutations encode
loss-of-function alleles of gli1. In contrast to mouse Gli1
mutants, dtr mutants and embryos injected with gli1
antisense morpholino oligonucleotides display defects in the activation of Hh target genes in the ventral neuroectoderm. Mutations in you-too (yot) encode C-terminally truncated Gli2. These
truncated proteins act as dominant repressors of Hh signaling, in part by
blocking Gli1 function. In contrast, blocking Gli2 function by eliminating full-length Gli2 results in minor Hh signaling defects and uncovers a repressor function of Gli2 in the telencephalon. In addition,
Gli1 and Gli2 have activator functions during somite and neural development. These results reveal divergent requirements for Gli1 and Gli2 in mouse and zebrafish and indicate that zebrafish Gli1 is an activator of Hh-regulated genes, while zebrafish Gli2 has minor roles as a repressor or activator of Hh targets (Karlstrom, 2003).
Hedgehog signaling regulates cell differentiation and patterning in a wide variety of embryonic tissues. In vertebrates, at least three Gli transcription factors (Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3) are involved in Hh signal transduction. Comparative studies have revealed divergent requirements for Gli1 and Gli2 in zebrafish and mouse. This study addresses the question of whether Gli3 function has also diverged in zebrafish and the regulatory interactions between Hh signaling and Gli activity has been analyzed. Zebrafish Gli3 has an early function as an activator of Hh target genes that overlaps with Gli1 activator function in the ventral neural tube. In vitro reporter analysis shows that Gli3 cooperates with Gli1 to activate transcription in the presence of high concentrations of Hh. During late somitogenesis stages, Gli3 is required as a repressor of the Hh response. Gli3 shares this repressor activity with Gli2 in the dorsal spinal cord, hindbrain, and midbrain, but not in the forebrain. Consistently, zebrafish Gli3 blocks Gli1-mediated activation of a reporter gene in the absence of Hh in vitro. In the eye, Gli3 is also required for proper ath5 expression and the differentiation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). These results reveal a conserved role for Gli3 in vertebrate development and uncover novel regional functions and regulatory interactions among gli genes (Tyurina, 2005).
Three major axon pathways cross the midline of the vertebrate forebrain
early in embryonic development: the postoptic commissure (POC), the anterior
commissure (AC) and the optic nerve. A small population of Gfap+
astroglia spans the midline of the zebrafish forebrain in the position of, and
prior to, commissural and retinal axon crossing. These glial 'bridges' form in
regions devoid of the guidance molecules slit2 and slit3,
although a subset of these glial cells express slit1a.
Hh signaling is required for commissure formation, glial bridge formation, and
the restricted expression of the guidance molecules slit1a,
slit2, slit3 and sema3d, but Hh does not
appear to play a direct role in commissural and retinal axon guidance.
Reducing Slit2 and/or Slit3 function expands the glial bridges and causes
defasciculation of the POC, consistent with a 'channeling' role for these
repellent molecules. By contrast, reducing Slit1a function leads to reduced
midline axon crossing, suggesting a distinct role for Slit1a in midline axon
guidance. Blocking Slit2 and Slit3, but not Slit1a, function in the Hh pathway
mutant yot (gli2DR) dramatically rescues POC axon crossing
and glial bridge formation at the midline, indicating that expanded Slit2 and
Slit3 repellent function is largely responsible for the lack of midline
crossing in these mutants. Hh signaling appears to affect axon guidance indirectly through
its role in patterning of the midline,
including the formation of the glial bridge and the regulation of axon guidance-molecule expression.
This analysis shows that Hh signaling helps to
pattern the expression of Slit guidance molecules that then help to regulate
glial cell position and axon guidance across the midline of the forebrain (Barresi, 2005).
Signaling by lipid-modified secreted glycoproteins of the Hedgehog family play fundamental roles during pattern formation in animal development and in humans; dysfunction of Hedgehog pathway components is frequently associated with a variety of congenital abnormalities and cancer. Transcriptional regulation of Hedgehog target genes is mediated by members of the Gli zinc-finger transcription factors. The relative nuclear concentrations of Gli activator (Gliact) and repressor (Glirep) forms, together with their nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, appear to be critical determinants for target gene expression. Whereas such stringent controls of Gli activity are critical in ensuring appropriate levels of pathway activation, the mechanisms by which these processes are regulated remain inadequately understood. Genetic analysis has been used to show that the zebrafish iguana gene product acts downstream of the Smoothened protein to modulate Gli activity in the somites of the developing embryo. Positional cloning reveals that iguana encodes the zebrafish ortholog of Dzip1, a novel zinc-finger/coiled-coil domain protein that can shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus in a manner correlated with Hedgehog pathway activity (Wolff, 2004).
The phenotypic similarity and synergistic interaction between igu mutants and Su(fu) depletion and overexpression could imply a mechanistic similarity between igu and Su(fu) function. Moreover, like Su(fu), the Igu protein localizes to the cytoplasm, but translocates to the nucleus in response to the same signal that activates Gli activity. This translocation could be driven by an interaction between Igu and the Gli proteins, as seems to be the case for Su(fu); according to this scenario, the nuclear-localized Igu might function by modulating nuclear Gli activity. Alternatively, Igu might itself regulate the nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of the Glis. Consistent with this notion, it was found that like Su(fu) morphants, igu enhances the dominant effect of yot heterozygotes, suggesting an increased nuclear accumulation of the constitutively active Gli2rep encoded by the yot mutant allele. In this regard, it is striking that the C-terminally truncated form of Igu is constitutively localized to the nucleus. Although this could imply a possible mechanism for the increased activity of both Gli1 as well as the Gli2rep in igu mutants, the fact that the igu mutant alleles are completely recessive, and that misexpression of a truncated form of Igu has no effect on muscle specification argues against this. Furthermore, the MO-mediated inhibition of Igu expression has identical phenotypic consequences to the mutant alleles that encode truncated forms of the protein, implying that the increased activities of Gli1 and Gli2rep are independent of the aberrant nuclear localization of the mutant proteins (Wolff, 2004).
As with Su(fu), the cytoplasmic retention of Igu may reflect its physical interaction with one or more Gli proteins. Such an interaction could be direct or via an intermediary, perhaps Su(fu) itself. The molecular structure of the Igu protein is certainly consistent with these possibilities, the single zinc-finger and the coiled-coil domains both capable of mediating protein-protein interactions; however, given the properties of the truncated protein, it is predicted that any such Gli interaction would be mediated by the coiled-coil domain. Alternatively, Igu distribution in uninduced cells may be controlled primarily by the NES, which is deleted in the C-terminally truncated form of the protein. Unraveling the details of interactions between Igu and its potential partners, and the requirements for the NLS and NES, will be essential in elucidating the basis of its contrasting effects on Gli1 and Gli2 activity (Wolff, 2004).
Cubitus interruptus homologs in amphibians In frog embryos, Gli1 is expressed transiently in the prospective floor plate during
gastrulation and in cells lateral to the midline during late gastrula and neurula stages. In contrast, Gli2
and Gli3 are absent from the neural plate midline with Gli2 expressed widely and Gli3 in a graded
fashion, with highest levels in lateral regions. In mouse embryos, the three Gli genes show a similar
pattern of expression in the neural tube but are coexpressed throughout the early neural plate.
Gli1 is the only Gli gene expressed in the prospective floor plate cells of frog embryos: it therefore seemed likely that this gene would be involved in ventral neural tube development. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling activates Gli1 transcription and widespread expression of endogenous frog Gli1, but not Gli3, in developing frog embryos. This results in the ectopic differentiation of floor plate
cells and ventral neurons within the neural tube. Floor-plate-inducing ability is retained when
cytoplasmic Gli1 proteins are either forced into the nucleus or are fused to the VP16 transactivating domain. Gli1 induces HNF-3ß, a ventral marker, in the neural tube as well as in the epidermal ectoderm. In addition, ectopic expression of Gli1 induces the ectopic expression of Sonic hedgehog and the floor-plate-specific marker F-spondin. Embryos injected with Gli1 display ectopic cells in the midbrain resembling putative neurons. These ectopic cells can be identified as 5HT (serotonin) producing neurons
These results identify Gli1 as a midline target of Shh and suggest that it mediates the induction of
floor plate cells and ventral neurons when Shh acts as a transcriptional regulator (Lee, 1997).
In Xenopus, the Gli-type proteins XGli-3 and XGli-4 are first expressed in earliest
stages of mesoderm and neural development. Transient transfection assays reveal that XGli-3 and
XGli-4 can function as transcription repressors. Counteracting the Gli-protein repressor activity by
ectopic expression of a fusion protein that contains the Gli-zinc finger cluster connected to the E1A
activator domain in Xenopus embryos results in specific morphological alterations in the developing
somites and in the central nervous system. Altered expression characteristics for a broad set of
molecular markers highlighting specific aspects of mesodermal and neural differentiation demonstrate
an important role for Gli-type zinc finger proteins in the early mesodermal and neural patterning of
Xenopus embryos. Muscle development is severly disturbed by expression of the fusion protein activator, as can be seen by the failure to form ordered somatic segments and from effects on the expression of mesoderm/muscle-specific markers such as MyoD and cardiac actin Gene expression in the neural tube is grossly disturbed. For example, there is an increase in Delta expression; eye vesicles are absent, and Pax-6 transcription is strongly reduced. Neural crest precursors fail to express the twist gene, a molecular marker for cephalic neural crest (Marine, 1997).
The Drosophila homeoproteins Ara and Caup are members of a combination of factors (prepattern) that
control the highly localized expression of the proneural genes achaete and scute. Two
Xenopus homologs of ara and caup (Xiro1 and Xiro2) have been identified. Like their Drosophila counterparts, they control the expression of proneural genes and, probably as a consequence, the size of the neural plate. In Xenopus, ectopic expression of these genes expands the neural plate, similar to the effect of overexpressing XASH-3 and ATH-3. Xiro expression precedes expression of the proneural genes, and partially overlaps the domains of expression of XASH-3 and ATH-3 and those of X-ngnr-1, another proneural gene. When overexpressed, X-ngnr-1 causes the differentiation of ectopic neurons. Xiro1 and Xiro2 are themselves controlled by noggin and retinoic acid. Like ara and caup, they are overexpressed in Xenopus embryos as a result of the expression of Drosophila cubitus interruptus gene, suggesting that neurogenesis is induced by the hedgehog family of proteins. These and other findings suggest the conservation of at least part of the genetic cascade that
regulates proneural genes, and the existence in vertebrates of a prepattern of factors important to control
the differentiation of the neural plate (GŪmez-Skarmeta, 1998).
Patterning along the anteroposterior (A/P) axis involves the
interplay of secreted and transcription factors that specify
cell fates in the mesoderm and neuroectoderm. While FGF
and homeodomain proteins have been shown to play
different roles in posterior specification, the network
coordinating their effects remains elusive. The function of Gli zinc-finger proteins in
mesodermal A/P patterning has been examined. Gli2 is sufficient
to induce ventroposterior development, functioning in the
FGF-brachyury regulatory loop. Gli2 directly induces
brachyury, a gene required and sufficient for mesodermal
development, and Gli2 is in turn induced by FGF signaling.
Moreover, the homeobox gene Xhox3, a critical
determinant of posterior development, is also directly
regulated by Gli2. Gli3, but not Gli1, has an activity similar
to that of Gli2 and is expressed in ventroposterior
mesoderm after Gli2. These findings uncover a novel
function of Gli proteins, previously only known to mediate
hedgehog signals, in the maintenance and patterning of the
embryonic mesoderm. More generally, these results suggest
a molecular basis for an integration of FGF and hedgehog
inputs in Gli-expressing cells that respond to these signals (Brewster, 2000).
Previous work has shown that Gli2 can be induced by SHH
signaling in frog embryos, and that it can mediate some of the
effects of SHH. FGF
also induces Gli2, although it remains unclear which factors
directly initiate its expression in mesoderm, as this is difficult
to separate from the general induction of mesoderm by FGF or
TGFbeta family signals. While Gli2/3 function in mesoderm may have nothing to do
with HH signaling, HH genes have been reported to be
expressed at low levels throughout the gastrula marginal zone, raising the possibility that Gli2 and Gli3
activity in mesoderm could be responsive to HH signals by
analogy with some of its later roles in neural development. For
example, a low tonic HH signal throughout the marginal zone
could attenuate the formation of putative Gli3 repressors, a
process regulated by the SHH signaling pathway, thus allowing
Gli2 and Gli3 activator forms to function in ventroposterior
development. The fact that misexpression of HHs at early
stages has no obvious consequence on mesodermal
development could be consistent with this possibility
if repressor forms were not required in mesoderm. In mice, loss
of SHH, Gli2 or Gli3 function does not appear to affect the
early embryonic mesoderm, possibly indicating that Gli proteins
could have partially divergent roles in different organisms (Brewster, 2000).
The role of Gli2 in FGF signaling, the ability of FGF and
SHH to induce its expression and its partial mediation of SHH
functions suggest a
mechanism for a possible integration of FGF and HH signaling
in tissues in which these signals act on the same Gli-expressing
cells. SHH can act through Gli1, and Gli3 has an antagonistic
relationship with SHH/Gli1. In contrast, SHH can also act
through Gli2 in some contexts, but in others, Gli2 can instead
antagonize the actions of SHH and Gli1. A context-dependent function of Gli2 could
therefore underlie the sometimes synergistic and sometimes
antagonistic effects of FGFs and HHs. Similarly, antagonism
between HH and FGF signaling could result from their use of
Gli1 and Gli3, respectively. This model may be particularly
relevant for Gli-expressing precursor cells. For example, SHH
is a known mitogen for cerebellar granule precursors and FGF
can partially inhibit this effect. Because Wnt signaling has been recently suggested to affect Gli2 and Gli3 expression in chick somites, a challenge of ongoing studies is to elucidate how
different signaling inputs regulate Gli function in vertebrate
development and disease (Brewster, 2000).
Sonic hedgehog is involved in eye field separation along the proximodistal axis. As the optic vesicle and optic cup mature, Hh signalling continues to be important in defining aspects of the proximodistal axis. Two other Hedgehog proteins, Banded hedgehog and Cephalic hedgehog, related to the mouse Indian hedgehog and Desert hedgehog, respectively, are strongly expressed in the central retinal pigment epithelium but excluded from the peripheral pigment epithelium surrounding the ciliary marginal zone. By contrast, downstream components of the Hedgehog signalling pathway, Gli2, Gli3 and X-Smoothened, are expressed in this narrow peripheral epithelium. This zone contains cells that are in the proliferative state. This equivalent region in the adult mammalian eye, the pigmented ciliary epithelium, has been identified as a zone in which retinal stem cells reside. These data, combined with double labelling and the use of other retinal pigment epithelium markers, show that the retinal pigment epithelium of tadpole embryos has a molecularly distinct peripheral to central axis. In addition, Gli2, Gli3 and X-Smoothened are also expressed in the neural retina, in the most peripheral region of the ciliary marginal zone, where retinal stem cells are found in Xenopus, suggesting that they are good markers for retinal stem cells. To test the role of the Hedgehog pathway at different stages of retinogenesis, the pathway was activated by injecting a dominant-negative form of PKA or blocking it by treating embryos with cyclopamine. Embryos injected or treated at early stages display clear proximodistal defects in the retina. Interestingly, the main phenotype of embryos treated with cyclopamine at late stages is a severe defect in RPE differentiation. This study thus provides new insights into the role of Hedgehog signalling in the formation of the proximodistal axis of the eye and the differentiation of retinal pigment epithelium (Perron, 2003).
Cubitus interruptus homologs in birds and mammals Three proteins identified in mammals, GLI, GLI2, and GLI3, all share a highly conserved
zinc finger domain with Drosophila Cubitus interruptus and are believed to function as transcription
factors in the vertebrate Sonic hedgehog-Patched signaling pathway. The transcriptional regulatory properties of GLI and its contribution of specific domains to
transcriptional regulation have been characterized in order to better understand the role GLI plays
in the Sonic hedgehog-Patched pathway and mechanisms of GLI-induced transcriptional regulation. GLI activates expression of reporter constructs
in HeLa cells in a concentration-dependent manner through the GLI consensus binding motif; a
GAL4 binding domain-GLI fusion protein activates reporter expression through the GAL4 DNA
binding site. GLI-induced transcriptional activation requires the carboxyl-terminal amino acids
1020-1091, which include an 18-amino acid region highly similar to the alpha-helical herpes simplex
viral protein 16 activation domain, including the consensus recognition element for the human TFIID
TATA box-binding protein-associated factor TAFII31 and conservation of all three amino acid
residues believed to directly contact chemically complementary residues in TAFII31. The presence of
this 18-amino acid region in the GLI activation domain provides a mechanism for GLI-induced transcriptional
regulation (Yoon, 1998).
Two members of the GLI family have been isolated from the chick, GLI and GLI3. Their expression patterns in a variety of tissues during embryogenesis suggest that these genes may be targets of Sonic hedgehog signals. The two GLI genes are differentially regulated by Sonic hedgehog during limb development. Sonic hedgehog up-regulates GLI transcription, while down-regulating GLI3 expression in the mesenchymal cells of the developing limb bud. An activated form of GLI can induce expression of Patched a known target of Sonic hedgehog, thus inplicating GLI as a key transcription factor in the vertebrate hedgehog signaling pathway. In conjunction with evidence from a mouse Gli3 mutant, these data suggest that GLI and GLI3 may have taken two different functions of their Drosophila homolog CI. These two functions are the mediation of hedgehog signaling and the repression of hedgehog transcription (Domínguez, 1996). In Drosophila the same transcription factor can be utilized for both purposes because the cells expressing hedgehog and the cells reponsive to it are mutually exclusive populations. In the vertebrate limb, where the responsive cells overlap the cells producing Sonic hedgehog, the same factor cannot be used (Marigo, 1996).
The regulation of the Gli genes during somite formation has
been investigated in quail embryos. The Gli genes are a
family encoding three related zinc finger transcription
factors, Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3, which are effectors of Shh
signaling in responding cells. A quail Gli3 cDNA has been
cloned and its expression compared with Gli1 and Gli2.
These studies show that Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3 are co-activated
at the time of somite formation, thus providing a
mechanism for regulating the initiation of Shh signaling in
somites. Embryo surgery and paraxial mesoderm explant
experiments show that each of the Gli genes is regulated by
distinct signaling mechanisms. Gli1 is activated in response
to Shh produced by the notochord, which also controls the
dorsalization of Gli2 and Gli3 following their activation by
Wnt signaling from the surface ectoderm and neural tube.
This surface ectoderm/neural tube Wnt signaling has both
negative and positive functions in Gli2 and Gli3 regulation:
these signals repress Gli3 in segmental plate mesoderm
prior to somite formation and then promote somite
formation and the somite-specific activation of Gli2 and
Gli3. These studies, therefore, establish a role for Wnt
signaling in the control of Shh signal transduction through
the regulation of Gli2 and Gli3, and provide a mechanistic
basis for the known synergistic actions of surface
ectoderm/neural tube and notochord signaling in somite
cell specification (Borycki, 2000).
A model is presented for Wnt and Shh signaling in the control of Gli gene
activation during somite formation. In this model, in the segmental plate mesoderm, Gli3 is maintained in a repressed state by Wnt signaling through beta-catenin.
When anteriormost segmental plate mesoderm initiates somite
formation, Wnt/beta-catenin signaling undergoes a negative to positive
switch, leading to derepression of Gli3, to the initiation of somite
formation, and to activation of the somite-specific expression of Gli2
and Gli3. It is suggested that this switch in Wnt/beta-catenin
function might be mediated by transcription cofactors such as
Groucho, NLK and CtBP, factors that are known to control the transcription activities of beta-catenin/LEF1/tcf complexes in segmental plate mesoderm. The process of somite formation and the regulated expression of beta-catenin cofactors might be be under the control of the segmentation genes. Quantitative changes in Wnt signaling at the time of somite formation, resulting from the
activation of Wnt expression in the neural tube and loss of Wnt inhibitors in newly forming somites, would then mediate increased levels of beta-catenin. This high level of beta-catenin would participate in both the cytoplasmic
cell adhesion processes to initiate somite formation as well as in new beta-catenin/LEF1/tcf transcription complexes for Gli2 and Gli3 activation.
The Gli2 and Gli3 proteins produced in newly formed somites would then become activated as nuclear transcription factors in response to the Shh
that is produced by the notochord, leading to their participation in the activation of Shh response genes, including Gli1 and Ptc1 (Borycki, 2000).
Three mouse genes, Gli, Gli-2, and Gli-3, which share a similar zinc finger domain with the products of Cubitus interruptus and the Caenorhabditis
elegans sex-determining gene tra-1 have been cloned and characterized. Expression is first detected during gastrulation in both the
ectoderm and mesoderm. Later in development, their expression becomes more restricted in various ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues and is not detectable after completion of organogenesis. Interestingly, in the developing neural tube, Gli shows a narrow ventral domain of expression, whereas Gli-2 and Gli-3 show a broad and dorsally restricted domain. Expression
of these three Gli genes in various ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues suggests that they play multiple roles during postimplantation development. Consistent with this hypothesis, a naturally
occurring Gli-3 mutation, the mouse extra-toes mutant; shows defects in both mesoderm- and ectoderm-derived tissues (Hui, 1994).
The secreted factor Sonic hedgehog (SHH) is both necessary and sufficient to induce multiple developmental
processes, including ventralization of the CNS, branching
morphogenesis of the lungs and anteroposterior patterning
of the limbs. Based on analogy to the Drosophila Hh
pathway, the multiple GLI transcription factors in
vertebrates are likely to both transduce SHH signaling and
repress Shh transcription. In order to discriminate between
overlapping versus unique requirements for the three Gli
genes in mice, a Gli1 mutant was produced and
the phenotypes of Gli1/Gli2 and Gli1/3 double
mutants were analyzed. Gli3xt mutants have polydactyly and dorsal CNS
defects associated with ectopic Shh expression, indicating
GLI3 plays a role in repressing Shh. In contrast, Gli2
mutants have five digits, but lack a floorplate, indicating
that it is required to transduce SHH signaling in some
tissues. Remarkably, mice homozygous for a Gli1zfd
mutation that deletes the exons encoding the DNA-binding
domain are viable and appear normal. Transgenic mice
expressing a GLI1 protein lacking the zinc fingers can not
induce SHH targets in the dorsal brain, indicating that the
Gli1zfd allele contains a hypomorphic or null mutation.
Interestingly, Gli1zfd/zfd;Gli2zfd/+, but not Gli1zfd/zfd;Gli3zfd/+
double mutants have a severe phenotype; most
Gli1zfd/zfd;Gli2zfd/+ mice die soon after birth and all have
multiple defects including a variable loss of ventral spinal
cord cells and smaller lungs that are similar to, but
less extreme than, Gli2zfd/zfd mutants. Gli1/Gli2 double
homozygous mutants have more extreme CNS and lung
defects than Gli1zfd/zfd;Gli2zfd/+ mutants, however, in
contrast to Shh mutants, ventrolateral neurons develop in
the CNS and the limbs have 5 digits with an extra postaxial
nubbin. These studies demonstrate that the zinc-finger
DNA-binding domain of GLI1 protein is not required for
SHH signaling in mouse. Furthermore, Gli1 and Gli2, but
not Gli1 and Gli3, have extensive overlapping functions that
are likely downstream of SHH signaling (Park, 2000).
Drosophila transcription factor cubitus interruptus (Ci) and its co-activator CRE (cAMP response element)-binding protein (CBP) activate a group of target genes on the anterior-posterior border in response to Hedgehog protein (Hh) signaling. In contrast, in the anterior region, the carboxyl-truncated form of Ci generated by protein processing represses Hh expression. In vertebrates, three Ci-related transcription factors (glioblastoma gene products [GLIs] 1, 2, and 3) have been identified, but their functional difference in Hh signal transduction is unknown. Distinct roles are reported for GLI1 and GLI3 in Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. GLI3, which contains both repression and activation domains, acts both as an activator and a repressor, as does Ci, whereas GLI1 contains only the activation domain. Consistent with this, GLI3, but not GLI1, is processed to generate the repressor form. Transcriptional co-activator CBP binds to GLI3, but not to GLI1. The trans-activating capacity of GLI3 is positively and negatively regulated by Shh and cAMP-dependent protein kinase, respectively, through a specific region of GLI3, which contains the CBP-binding domain and the phosphorylation sites of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. GLI3 directly binds to the Gli1 promoter and induces Gli1 transcription in response to Shh. Thus, GLI3 may act as a mediator of Shh signaling in the activation of the target gene Gli1 (Dai, 1999).
The hedgehog signal transduction network performs critical roles in mediating cell-cell interactions during embryogenesis and organogenesis. Loss-of-function or
misexpression mutation of hedgehog network components can cause birth defects, skin cancer, and other tumors. The Gli gene family (Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3) encodes zinc finger transcription factors that act as mediators of hedgehog signal transduction. The role of Gli2 in mammary gland
development has been investigated. Mammary expression of Gli2 is developmentally regulated in a tissue compartment-specific manner. Expression is exclusively stromal during virgin stages of development but becomes both epithelial and stromal during pregnancy and lactation. The null phenotype with respect to both ductal and alveolar development was examined by transplantation rescue of embryonic mammary glands into physiologically normal host females. Glands derived from both wild type and null embryo donors show ductal outgrowths that develop to equivalent extents in virgin hosts. However, in null transplants, ducts are frequently distended or irregularly shaped and show a range of histological alterations similar to micropapillary ductal hyperplasias in the human breast. Alveolar development during pregnancy is not overtly affected by loss of Gli2 function. Ductal defects are not observed when homozygous null epithelium is transplanted into a wild type stromal background, indicating that Gli2 function is required primarily in the stroma for proper ductal development. Gli2 heterozygotes also demonstrate an elevated frequency and severity of focal ductal dysplasia relative to that of wild type littermate- and age-matched control animals (Lewis, 2001).
In mice, three Gli genes are thought to collectively mediate sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. Mis-expression studies and analysis of null mutants for each gene have indicated that the Gli proteins have different functions. In particular, Gli1 appears to be a constitutive activator, and Gli2 and Gli3 have repressor functions. To determine the precise functional differences between Gli1 and Gli2, Gli1 has been expressed in place of Gli2 from the endogenous Gli2 locus in mice. Strikingly, a low level of Gli1 can rescue all the Shh signaling defects in Gli2 mutants; however, this is the case only in the presence of a wild-type Shh gene. These studies demonstrate that only the activator function of Gli2 is actually required, and indicate that in specific situations, Shh can modulate the ability of Gli1 to activate target genes. Furthermore, expression of both copies of Gli1 in place of Gli2 does not disrupt spinal cord patterning, but does result in new gain-of-function defects that lead to lethality. The defects are enhanced when Gli3 function is reduced, demonstrating that an important difference between Gli1 and Gli2 is the ability of Gli1 to antagonize Gli3 function (Bai, 2001).
Cubitus interruptus: transcriptional targets There is growing evidence that Gli proteins participate in the mediation of Hedgehog and FGF signaling in neural
and mesodermal development. However, little is known about which genes act downstream of Gli proteins.
The regulation of members of the Wnt family by Gli proteins in different contexts is shown in this study. These findings
indicate that Gli2 regulates Wnt8 expression in the ventral marginal zone of the early frog embryo: activating Gli2
constructs induce ectopic Wnt8 expression in animal cap explants, whereas repressor forms inhibit its
endogenous expression in the marginal zone. Using truncated Frizzled and dominant-negative Wnt constructs,
the requirement of at least two Wnt proteins, Wnt8 and Wnt11, for Gli2/3-induced posterior
mesodermal development is shown. Blocking Wnt signals, however, inhibits Gli2/3-induced morphogenesis, but not
mesodermal specification. Gli2/3 may therefore normally coordinate the action of these two Wnt proteins, which
regulate distinct downstream pathways. In addition, the finding that Gli1 consistently induces a distinct set of
Wnt genes in animal cap explants and in skin tumors suggests that Wnt regulation by Gli proteins is general. Such
a mechanism may link signals that induce Gli activity, such as FGFs and Hedgehogs, with Wnt function (Mullor, 2001).
The zinc finger transcription factor GLI3 is considered a repressor of vertebrate Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. In humans, the
absence of GLI3 function causes Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome, affecting the development of the brain, eye, face,
and limb. Because the etiology of these malformations is not well understood, the phenotype of mouse Gli-/-
mutants was examined as a model to investigate this. An up-regulation of Fgf8 is observed in the anterior neural ridge, isthmus, eye, facial
primordia, and limb buds of mutant embryos, sites coinciding with the human disease. Intriguingly, endogenous apoptosis
is reduced in Fgf8-positive areas in Gli-/- mutants. Since SHH is thought to be involved in Fgf8 regulation,
Fgf8 expression was compared in Shh-/- and Gli-/-;Shh-/- mutant embryos. Whereas Fgf8 expression is almost absent in Shh-/-
mutants, it is up-regulated in Gli-/-;Shh-/- double mutants, suggesting that SHH is not required for Fgf8 induction, and that GLI3 normally represses Fgf8 independently of SHH. In the limb bud, evidence is provided that ectopic expression of
Gremlin in Gli-/- mutants might contribute to a decrease in apoptosis. Together, these data reveal that GLI3 limits
Fgf8-expression domains in multiple tissues, through a mechanism that may include the induction or maintenance of apoptosis. It is concluded that Fgf8 may not be a direct target of GLI3 but that the size of the Fgf domain may be regulated by GLI3 indirectly; when GLI3 is present, it activates the expression of Bmps, which regulates cell death to alter the size of FGF8 domains (Aoto, 2002).
Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) plays a critical role in osteoblast function. In Drosophila, Cubitus interruptus (Ci), which mediates hedgehog signaling, regulates gene expression of dpp, the ortholog of mammalian BMP-2. Null mutation of the transcription factor Gli2, a mammalian homolog of Ci, results in severe skeletal abnormalities in mice. It was hypothesized that Gli2 regulates BMP-2 gene transcription and thus osteoblast differentiation. The present study shows that overexpression of Gli2 enhances BMP-2 promoter activity and mRNA expression in osteoblast precursor cells. In contrast, knocking down Gli2 expression by Gli2 small interfering RNA or genetic ablation of the Gli2 gene results in significant inhibition of BMP-2 gene expression in osteoblasts. Promoter analyses, including chromatin immunoprecipitation and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, provided direct evidence that Gli2 physically interacts with the BMP-2 promoter. Functional studies showed that Gli2 is required for osteoblast maturation in a BMP-2-dependent manner. Finally, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) stimulates BMP-2 promoter activity and osteoblast differentiation, and the effects of Shh are mediated by Gli2. Taken together, these results indicate that Gli2 mediates hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts and is a powerful activator of BMP-2 gene expression, which is required in turn for normal osteoblast differentiation (Zhao, 2006; full text of article).
Sonic hedgehog (Shh) acts as a morphogen to mediate the specification of distinct cell identities in the ventral neural tube through a Gli-mediated (Gli1-3) transcriptional network. Identifying Gli targets in a systematic fashion is central to the understanding of the action of Shh. This issue was examined in differentiating neural progenitors in mouse. An epitope-tagged Gli-activator protein was used to directly isolate cis-regulatory sequences by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). ChIP products were then used to screen custom genomic tiling arrays of putative Hedgehog (Hh) targets predicted from transcriptional profiling studies, surveying 50-150 kb of non-transcribed sequence for each candidate. In addition to identifying expected Gli-target sites, the data predicted a number of unreported direct targets of Shh action. Transgenic analysis of binding regions in Nkx2.2, Nkx2.1 (Titf1) and Rab34 established these as direct Hh targets. These data also facilitated the generation of an algorithm that improved in silico predictions of Hh target genes. Together, these approaches provide significant new insights into both tissue-specific and general transcriptional targets in a crucial Shh-mediated patterning process (Volkes, 2007).
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Brain development In the developing vertebrate CNS, members of the Wnt gene family are characteristically expressed at signaling centers that pattern adjacent parts of the neural tube. To identify candidate signaling centers in the telencephalon, Wnt gene fragments were isolated from cDNA derived from embryonic mouse telencephalon. In situ hybridization experiments demonstrate that one of the isolated Wnt genes,
Wnt7a, is broadly expressed in the embryonic telencephalon. By contrast, three others, Wnt3a, 5a and
a novel mouse Wnt gene, Wnt2b, are expressed only at the medial edge of the telencephalon, defining
the hem of the cerebral cortex. The Wnt-rich cortical hem is a transient, neuron-containing,
neuroepithelial structure that forms a boundary between the hippocampus and the telencephalic choroid
plexus epithelium (CPe) throughout their embryonic development. Indicating a close developmental
relationship between the cortical hem and the CPe, Wnt gene expression is upregulated in the cortical
hem both before and just as the CPe begins to form, and persists until birth. In addition, although the
cortical hem does not show features of differentiated CPe, such as expression of transthyretin mRNA,
the CPe and cortical hem are linked by shared expression of members of the Bmp and Msx gene
families. In the extra-toesJ (XtJ) mouse mutant, telencephalic CPe fails to develop. Wnt
gene expression is shown to be deficient at the cortical hem in XtJ/XtJ mice, but the expression of other
telencephalic developmental control genes, including Wnt7a, is maintained. The XtJ mutant carries a
deletion in Gli3, a vertebrate homolog of the Drosophila gene cubitus interruptus (ci), which encodes a transcriptional regulator of the Drosophila Wnt gene, wingless. These observations indicate that Gli3 participates in Wnt gene regulation in the vertebrate telencephalon, and suggest that the loss of telencephalic choroid plexus in XtJ mice is due to defects in the cortical hem that include Wnt gene misregulation (Grove, 1998).
D/V patterning of the anterior neural plate is controlled by
several signaling centers.
Signals from the anterior neural ridge (ANR) regulate
expression of the Forkhead related factor Brain factor1 (Bf1), which is required for growth and
patterning of the telencephalon. Fgf8
represents an important component of this signal as Fgf8
applied to the prosencephalic neural plate mimics the effects
of the ANR. In addition,
the anterior non-neural ectoderm, the ANR and later the roof
of the forebrain produce several secreted factors of the bone
morphogenetic protein (Bmp) family. Bmps have been shown to
induce the expression of Msx1 in the dorsal midline of the
forebrain and to repress the expression of Bf1. Also, noggin,
encoding a secreted protein that binds to Bmps and prevents
the latter from interacting with its receptor, is expressed in
the telencephalic roof plate,
suggesting that Bmp activity is under stringent control during
dorsal forebrain development (Theil, 1999 and references).
The prechordal mesendoderm represents a key determinant
in the specification of the ventral forebrain and produces
Sonic hedgehog protein. Shh is expressed throughout the axial
mesendoderm and has been implicated
in ventral patterning throughout the neuraxis. Mice mutant for Shh are cyclopic and
exhibit disruptions of ventral forebrain formation. Mutations of the human SHH gene have also been
identified in patients with holoprosencephaly. These studies therefore implicate
Shh as an essential mediator of the inductive effects of the
prechordal mesendoderm (Theil, 1999 and references).
The dentate gyrus and hippocampus as centers for spatial
learning, memory and emotional behaviour have been the
focus of much interest in recent years. The molecular
information on their development, however, has been relatively
poor. To date, only Emx genes are known to be required for
dorsal telencephalon development. Forebrain development in the extra toes (XtJ) mouse mutant,
which carries a null mutation of the Gli3 gene, is described. Gli3 is a mediator of Shh signaling. The XtJ defect
leads to a failure to establish the dorsal di-telencephalic
junction and finally results in a severe size reduction of the
neocortex. In addition, XtJ/XtJ mice show absence of the
hippocampus (Ammon's horn plus dentate gyrus) and the
choroid plexus in the lateral ventricle. The medial wall of the
telencephalon, which gives rise to these structures, fails to
invaginate during embryonic development.
On a molecular level, disruption of dorsal telencephalon
development in XtJ/XtJ embryos correlates with a loss of
Emx1 and Emx2 expression. Furthermore, the expression
of Fgf8 and Bmp4 in the dorsal midline of the telencephalon
is altered. However, expression of Shh, which is negatively
regulated by Gli3 in the spinal cord, is not affected in the
XtJ/XtJ forebrain. This study therefore implicates Gli3 as
a key regulator for the development of the dorsal
telencephalon and implies that Gli3 is upstream of Emx
genes in a genetic cascade controlling dorsal telencephalic
development (Theil, 1999).
Based on their expression pattern, Emx genes are candidates
for playing a role in subdividing the prosencephalon.
Furthermore, their Drosophila homolog, empty spiracles,
functions as a gap gene as well as a segment identity gene
during head segmentation suggesting that
Emx genes might also be involved in specifying dorsal
telencephalon identity. However, the phenotypes of mice in
which Emx genes have been inactivated have not provided
clues on these potential roles. Analysis of the forebrain
phenotype of XtJ/XtJ mice therefore provides the first evidence
for a gene controlling formation of the di-telencephalic
boundary and specification of dorsal telencephalon identity (Theil, 1999).
The Gli3 mutation also affects development of the
telencephalic roof and the juxtaposed medium pallium.
Moreover, formation of the choroid plexus is disrupted in the
lateral ventricle while its development occurs normally in the
4th ventricle. The expression
patterns of several regulatory genes were found to be altered
in the telencephalic dorsal midline of XtJ/XtJ embryos. While
Fgf8 is ectopically activated in the trp, Bmp signaling is
negatively affected by the Gli3 mutation as judged by the loss
of Bmp4 and Msx1 expression and by the maintenance of
noggin expression. Interestingly, Fgf8 and Bmp2/Bmp4 have been shown to act antagonistically on cell proliferation and
differentiation in the dorsal forebrain.
Ectopic Fgf8 expression and loss of Bmp signaling in the roof
plate as observed in XtJ/XtJ embryos might therefore disrupt
the balance between these two processes (Theil, 1999).
Little is known about the mechanisms that control the development of regional identity in the mammalian telencephalon.
The Gli family of transcription factor genes is involved in the regulation of pattern at many sites in the embryo and is
expressed in the embryonic mouse telencephalon. Telencephalic patterning has been analyzed in the extra-toesJ
(XtJ) mouse
mutant, which carries a deletion in the Gli family member Gli3. Dorsoventral patterning of the telencephalon is dramatically disrupted in the XtJ
mutant. Specific dorsal telencephalic cell types and gene expression patterns are lost in
homozygous XtJ mutants, and features of ventral telencephalic identity develop ectopically in the dorsal telencephalon. This partial ventralization of the dorsal telencephalon does not appear to be induced by an expansion of Sonic hedgehog
expression in the telencephalon, but may be due to a loss of Bmp and Wnt gene expression in a putative dorsal telencephalic
signaling center, the cortical hem. These findings suggest that in dorsal telencephalon, Gli3 is needed to repress ventral
telencephalic identity (Tole, 2000).
At least two alternative explanations are possible of the
development of a partially 'ventralized' dorsal telencephalon
in the XtJ mouse. (1) Rather than causing a direct
expansion of a ventralizing signal, the Gli3 mutation may
result in a failure to supply a dorsalizing signal. In the spinal
cord and hindbrain, a balance between signals mediated by
Shh, and by Bmp proteins and other TGFbeta family members,
appears to regulate basic dorsoventral patterning of the
neural tube and the development of specific regional cell
types. The XtJ
mutant lacks Wnt and Bmp signals supplied by the cortical hem. Thus signals
may be lost that are normally required to specify and
expand dorsal telencephalic cell populations and to antagonize
signals that ventralize the telencephalon. The loss of
cortical hem expression of Wnt3a, for
example, could alone account for the loss of the hippocampus
in XtJ
homozygous mutants. A striking loss of the
hippocampus has been observed in mice deficient in expression
of Wnt3a, indicating that a local Wnt3a signal, derived
from the cortical hem, is required for hippocampal development.
(2) Another possible explanation is that the Gli3 mutation
in XtJ mutants results in the loss of a mechanism that
normally suppresses a Shh-activated ventralizing pathway (Tole, 2000).
The mechanisms that regulate the growth of the brain remain unclear. Sonic
hedgehog (Shh) is expressed in a layer-specific manner in the perinatal mouse neocortex and tectum, whereas the Gli genes, which are targets and mediators of SHH signaling, are expressed in proliferative zones. In vitro and in vivo assays show that SHH is a mitogen for neocortical and tectal precursors and that it modulates cell proliferation in the dorsal brain.
Together with its role in the cerebellum, these findings indicate that SHH signaling unexpectedly controls the development of the three major dorsal brain structures. A variety of primary human brain tumors and tumor lines
consistently express the GLI genes and cyclopamine, a SHH signaling inhibitor, inhibits the proliferation of tumor cells. Using the in vivo tadpole assay system, it has been further shown that misexpression of GLI1 induces CNS hyperproliferation that depends on the activation of endogenous Gli1 function. SHH-GLI signaling thus modulates normal dorsal brain growth by
controlling precursor proliferation, an evolutionarily important and plastic process that is deregulated in brain tumors (Dahmane, 2001).
Considerable data suggest that sonic hedgehog (Shh) is both necessary and
sufficient for the specification of ventral pattern throughout the nervous
system, including the telencephalon. The regional markers induced
by Shh in the E9.0 telencephalon are dependent on the dorsoventral and
anteroposterior position of ectopic Shh expression. This suggests that by this
point in development regional character in the telencephalon is established.
To determine whether this prepattern is dependent on earlier Shh signaling, the telencephalon was examined in mice carrying either Shh- or
Gli3-null mutant alleles. This analysis revealed that the expression
of a subset of ventral telencephalic markers, including Dlx2 and
Gsh2, although greatly diminished, persists in
Shh-/- mutants, and that these same markers are expanded
in Gli3-/- mutants. To understand further the genetic
interaction between Shh and Gli3, Shh/Gli3 and
Smoothened/Gli3 double homozygous mutants were examined. Notably, in animals carrying either of these genetic backgrounds, genes such as Gsh2 and Dlx2, which are expressed pan-ventrally, as well as Nkx2.1, which demarcates the ventral most aspect of the telencephalon, appear to be largely restored to their wild-type patterns of expression. These results suggest that normal patterning in the telencephalon depends on the ventral repression of Gli3 function by Shh and, conversely, on the dorsal repression of Shh signaling by Gli3. In addition, these results support the idea that, in addition to hedgehog signaling, a Shh-independent pathways must act during development to pattern the telencephalon (Rallu, 2002).
Regionalization of the neural plate and the early neural tube is controlled by several signaling centers that direct the generation of molecularly distinct domains. In the developing telencephalon, the anterior neural ridge (ANR) and the roof and floor plate act as such organizing centers via the production of Fgfs, Bmps/Wnts, and Shh, respectively. It remains largely unknown, however, how the combination of these different signals is used to coordinate the generation of different telencephalic territories. Telencephalic development has been examined in Pdn mutant mice, which carry an integration of a retrotransposon in the Gli3 locus. Homozygous mutant animals are characterized by a partial dorsal-to-ventral transformation of the telencephalon and by an increased size of the septum. On a molecular level, these alterations correlate with a reduction and/or loss of Bmp/Wnt expression and a concomitant expansion of Fgf8 transcription. Evidence that the ectopic activation of Fgf signaling in the dorsal telencephalon provides an explanation for the ventralization of the Gli3 mutant telencephalon since application of Fgf8-soaked beads to dorsal telencephalic explants leads to the specific induction and repression of ventral marker and dorsal marker genes, respectively. In summary, Gli3 regulates the generation and specification of distinct dorsal and ventral telencephalic domains not only by restricting the dorsal extent of Shh signaling but also by setting up the antagonizing Fgf and Bmp/Wnt signaling centers. This dual mechanism ensures the coordinated development of distinct dorsal and ventral telencephalic progenitor domains (Kuschel, 2003).
The cerebellum consists of a highly organized set of folia that are largely
generated postnatally during expansion of the granule cell precursor (GCP)
pool. Since the secreted factor sonic hedgehog (Shh) is expressed in Purkinje
cells and functions as a GCP mitogen in vitro, it is possible that Shh
influences foliation during cerebellum development by regulating the position
and/or size of lobes. How Shh and its transcriptional mediators,
the Gli proteins, regulate GCP proliferation in vivo was studied, and whether they
influence foliation was tested. Shh expression correlates
spatially and temporally with foliation. Expression of the Shh target gene
Gli1 is also highest in the anterior medial cerebellum, but is
restricted to proliferating GCPs and Bergmann glia. By contrast, Gli2
is expressed uniformly in all cells in the developing cerebellum except
Purkinje cells and Gli3 is broadly expressed along the
anteroposterior axis. Whereas Gli mutants have a normal cerebellum,
Gli2 mutants have greatly reduced foliation at birth and a decrease
in GCPs. In a complementary study using transgenic mice, it was shown that
overexpressing Shh in the normal domain does not grossly alter the basic
foliation pattern, but does lead to prolonged proliferation of GCPs and an
increase in the overall size of the cerebellum. Taken together, these studies
demonstrate that positive Shh signaling through Gli2 is required to generate a
sufficient number of GCPs for proper lobe growth (Corrales, 2004).
Cerebellar development is a carefully orchestrated process that produces an
exquisitely foliated structure with a simple layered cytoarchitecture. In
mammals, the cerebellum is divided into three regions with distinct
anteroposterior (AP) foliation patterns: a central vermis and two bilaterally
symmetric hemispheres. The most abundant neurons in the cerebellum, as well as
the entire brain, are the granule cells. Whereas Purkinje cells and cerebellar
interneurons originate in the ventricular neuroepithelium, cerebellar granular
cell precursors (GCPs) arise from a germinal zone in the rhombic lip situated
in dorsal posterior rhombomere 1. The GCPs begin to leave the rhombic lip at
approximately embryonic day (E) 13 and migrate over the cerebellar anlage to
form the external granule layer (EGL). Although the EGL is formed by E15, GCPs
in the EGL remain mitotically active until 2 weeks postnatal. Granule cells
start to exit the cell cycle after birth and as part of their differentiation
program migrate internally past the Purkinje cells to form the inner granule
layer (IGL). Over the course of the first two postnatal weeks,
cerebellar folia form, suggesting the increase in granule cells is largely
responsible for foliation. The process of foliation begins with the formation
of four principal fissures, which divide the cerebellum into five cardinal
lobes. As GCP proliferation continues, these lobes expand and are further subdivided
to give rise to the species-specific foliation pattern observed in the mature
cerebellum. The fissures that divide the central cardinal lobe into lobes
VI-VIII are among the last to form in the vermis (Corrales, 2004).
It has been shown that an interaction between Purkinje cells and GCPs is
important for granule cell proliferation and foliation. For example, when
Purkinje cells are ablated or as in mouse mutants that lack Purkinje cells, such
as Lurcher and Staggerer, the GCP population is diminished
and foliation is arrested. One key GCP mitogen expressed in Purkinje cells is sonic
hedgehog (Shh), since it can induce proliferation of GCPs in culture, and
injection of Shh antibodies into the cerebellum reduces granule cell
proliferation. Shh signaling is mediated by the Gli family of transcription factors. In the spinal cord Gli2 is the primary activator of Shh signaling, whereas Gli3
functions mainly as a repressor but is also a weak activator. By
contrast, in the limb only Gli3 is required for digit patterning and to
regulate a normal level of proliferation. An
important question, therefore, is whether Shh functions in the cerebellum
primarily by inhibiting the Gli3 repressor as in the limb, and/or by inducing
the activator Gli2. Due to the embryonic lethality of Gli2 and
Gli3 mutants, the in vivo requirements for these two genes during
postnatal cerebellum development have not been addressed. Gli1 (Gli:
Mouse Genome Informatics) however, is not required for mouse development,
although it plays a redundant activator function with Gli2, which is revealed
only in Gli2 heterozygotes. Furthermore, unlike that of Gli2 and Gli3, Gli1 transcription is regulated by Shh signaling. In particular, all
transcription of Gli1 is absolutely dependent on induction of Gli2
and Gli3 activators by Hh signaling. Since Gli1 is a transcriptional target of Shh signaling, lacZ expression in Gli-lacZ knock-in mice
(Gli1lz/+) is a readout of positive Shh signaling (Corrales, 2004).
Gli1-lacZ mice were utilized to characterize the precise spatial and temporal
pattern of positive Shh signaling in the developing cerebellum. Strikingly,
Shh expression and signaling (Gli-lacZ expression) in the developing vermis is
spatially patterned from E18 to P10 with highest levels in anterior lobes
(III-VIa) and the most posterior lobe (X). Both Gli1 and Gli2 are primarily
excluded from Purkinje cells, and Gli expression is strongest in Bergmann glia
and in the GCPs in the outer layer of the EGL. Gli3 is expressed in
most cell types along the AP axis. In the absence of
Gli2, normal expansion of GCPs in the EGL is impaired, and foliation
is reduced at birth. Gli1-lacZ expression is undetectable in Gli2
mutants, demonstrating that Gli2 is the major activator required to transduce
Shh-positive signaling in the developing cerebellum. In support of this, the
thickness of the EGL appears normal in Gli3 mutants. In transgenic
mice overexpressing Shh in a normal pattern in the cerebellum, the
basic pattern of cerebellum foliation is maintained, although the entire
cerebellum is enlarged and the lobes that normally express higher levels of
Shh have an irregular IGL. In addition, the EGL persists longer than normal in
transgenics. This study utilizes in vivo experiments to establish a role for
positive Shh signaling in regulating expansion of the cerebellar lobes by
regulating GCP proliferation, and demonstrates that Gli2 is a required
mediator for this signaling (Corrales, 2004).
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Effects of mutation X-linked heterotaxy (HTX1) is a rare developmental disorder characterized by disturbances in embryonic laterality and other midline developmental field defects. HTX1 results from mutations in ZIC3, a member of the GLI transcription factor superfamily. A targeted deletion of the murine Zic3 locus has been created to investigate its function and interactions with other molecular components of the left-right axis pathway. Embryonic lethality is seen in approximately 50% of null mice with an additional 30% lethality in the perinatal period. Null embryos have defects in turning, cardiac development and neural tube closure. Malformations in live born null mice include complex congenital heart defects, pulmonary reversal or isomerism, CNS defects and vertebral/rib anomalies. Investigation of nodal expression in Zic3-deficient mice indicates that, although nodal is initially expressed symmetrically in the node, there is failure to maintain expression and to shift to asymmetric expression. Subsequent nodal and Pitx2 expression in the lateral plate mesoderm in these mice is randomized, indicating that Zic3 acts upstream of these genes in the determination of left-right asymmetry. The phenotype of these mice correctly models the defects found in human HTX1 and indicates an important role for Zic3 in both left-right and axial patterning (Purandare, 2002).
The Shh signaling pathway is required in many mammalian tissues for embryonic patterning, cell proliferation and differentiation. In addition, inappropriate activation of the pathway has been implicated in many human tumors. Based on transfection assays and gain-of-function studies in frog and mouse, the transcription factor Gli1 has been proposed to be a major mediator of Shh signaling. To address whether this is the case in mouse, a Gli1 null allele expressing lacZ was generated. Strikingly, Gli1 is not required for mouse development or viability. Of relevance, it has been shown that all transcription of Gli1 in the nervous system and limbs is dependent on Shh and, consequently, Gli1 protein is normally not present to transduce initial Shh signaling. To determine whether Gli1 contributes to the defects seen when the Shh pathway is inappropriately activated and Gli1 transcription is induced, Gli1;Ptc double mutants were generated. It has been shown that Gli1 is not required for the ectopic activation of the Shh signaling pathway or to the early embryonic lethal phenotype in Ptc null mutants. Instead, it has been found that Gli2 is required for mediating some of the inappropriate Shh signaling in Ptc mutants. These studies demonstrate that, in mammals, Gli1 is not required for Shh signaling and that Gli2 mediates inappropriate activation of the pathway due to loss of the negative regulator Ptc (C. B. Bai, 2002).
A concentration gradient of Shh is thought to pattern the ventral neural tube, and these ventral cell types are absent in shh-/- mice. Based on in vitro and genetic studies, the zinc finger-containing transcription factors Gli 1, 2, and 3 are mediators of the Shh intracellular response. The floorplate and adjacent cell types are absent in gli1-/-;gli2-/- mice, but part of the Shh-/- phenotype in the neural tube is alleviated in the Shh-/-;gli3-/- double mutant. This is consistent with the predicted role of Gli3 as a repressor of the Shh response. Gli3 repressor activity is blocked by Shh. In order to test the role of the repressor form of Gli3 in the neural tube, a truncated version of Gli3 (Gli3R*) was modeled after an allele found in Pallister Hall Syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder that includes hypothalamic hamartomas, a bifid epiglottis, polysydactyly, and abnormal craniofacial features. Gli3R* acts as a constitutive repressor independent of Shh signaling. Misexpression of Gli3R* in the chick neural tube caused a ventral expansion of class-I, dorsal progenitor proteins and a loss of class-II, ventral progenitor proteins consistent with expected activity as a repressor of the Shh response. Activation of the BMP response is sufficient to maintain gli3 expression in neural plate explants, which might be a mechanism by which BMPs antagonize the Shh response (Meyer, 2003).
Cubitus interruptus homologs: Neural tube midline Continued: Cubitus interruptus Evolutionary homologs part 2/3 | part 3/3
Biological Overview
| Regulation
| Targets of Activity
| Protein Interactions
| Developmental Biology
| Effects of Mutation
| References
Home page: The Interactive Fly © 1995, 1996 Thomas B. Brody, Ph.D.
The Interactive Fly resides on the
cubitus interruptus
continued:
Society for Developmental Biology's Web server.